Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Time-Independent Perturbation Theory in Quantum Mechanics, Lecture notes of Physics

A comprehensive explanation of time-independent perturbation theory in quantum mechanics. It delves into the formalism, deriving equations for first-order and second-order energy corrections and eigenstate modifications. The document uses a clear and detailed approach, illustrating the theory with examples and discussing the limitations of the method. It is particularly valuable for students studying quantum mechanics at an advanced level.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 12/12/2024

jackyens
jackyens 🇺🇸

3 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Physics 4100
Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory
Perturbation Theory
Introduction
The quantum mechanics you have studied so far has entailed solving a few carefully chosen
problems exactly. Unfortunately, those problems represent a small fraction of the realistic
problems that nature presents to us, and in most cases those exactly solvable problems are
only approximations to real problems. Now we must learn to solve more realistic problems
that do not admit exact solutions. The approach we take to solving these realistic problems
is to make them look like problems we have already solved exactly, with an additional part
that represents the new, more realistic aspect of the problem. We assume that this new
part, the perturbation, is small so that we can use approximations to find the corrections
to the exact solutions. Our focus is to discover how energies and eigenstates are affected by
small additional terms in the Hamiltonian. To guide us, we will take some exactly solvable
problems, solve them, and then expand the solutions. We will compare these results with
the new perturbation methods that we learn.
Time-Independent Perturbation Theory
The Formalism
Time-independent perturbation theory is an approximation scheme that applies in the fol-
lowing context: we know the solution to the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian Ho, and
we want the solution to H=Ho+H0, where H0is small compared to Hoin a sense to
be made precise shortly. For instance, Hocan be the Coulomb Hamiltonian for an electron
bound to proton, and H0the addition due to an external electric field that is weak compared
to the proton’s field at the (average) location of the electron. One refers to Hoas the un-
perturbed Hamiltonian and H0as the perturbing Hamiltonian or perturbation.
We proceed as follows. We assume that to every eigenket |ψo
ni≡|noiof Howith eigenvalue
Eo
n, there is an eigenket |niof Hwith eigenvalue E. We must assume here that |noiis is
non-degenerate. We then assume that the eigenkets and eigenvalues of Hmay expanded in
a perturbation series:
|ni=n(o)+n(1)+n(2)+. . .
En=E(o)
n+E(1)
n+E(2)
n+. . . (1)
To find the terms in the expansions for |niand Enwe start with the eigenvalue equation
H|ni=En|ni(2)
or
(Ho+H0)n(o)+n(1)+n(2)+. . . =
(E(o)
n+E(1)
n+E(2)
n+. . .)n(o)+n(1)+n(2)+. . . (3)
1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Time-Independent Perturbation Theory in Quantum Mechanics and more Lecture notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

Perturbation Theory

Introduction

The quantum mechanics you have studied so far has entailed solving a few carefully chosen

problems exactly. Unfortunately, those problems represent a small fraction of the realistic

problems that nature presents to us, and in most cases those exactly solvable problems are

only approximations to real problems. Now we must learn to solve more realistic problems

that do not admit exact solutions. The approach we take to solving these realistic problems

is to make them look like problems we have already solved exactly, with an additional part

that represents the new, more realistic aspect of the problem. We assume that this new

part, the perturbation, is small so that we can use approximations to find the corrections

to the exact solutions. Our focus is to discover how energies and eigenstates are affected by

small additional terms in the Hamiltonian. To guide us, we will take some exactly solvable

problems, solve them, and then expand the solutions. We will compare these results with

the new perturbation methods that we learn.

Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

The Formalism

Time-independent perturbation theory is an approximation scheme that applies in the fol-

lowing context: we know the solution to the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian H

o , and

we want the solution to H = H

o

  • H

′ , where H

′ is small compared to H

o in a sense to

be made precise shortly. For instance, H

o can be the Coulomb Hamiltonian for an electron

bound to proton, and H

′ the addition due to an external electric field that is weak compared

to the proton’s field at the (average) location of the electron. One refers to H

o as the un-

perturbed Hamiltonian and H

′ as the perturbing Hamiltonian or perturbation.

We proceed as follows. We assume that to every eigenket |ψ

o n〉 ≡ |n

o 〉 of H

o with eigenvalue

E

o n, there is an eigenket^ |n〉^ of^ H^ with eigenvalue^ E. We must assume here that^ |n

o 〉 is is

non-degenerate. We then assume that the eigenkets and eigenvalues of H may expanded in

a perturbation series:

|n〉 =

∣n(o)

∣n(1)

∣n(2)

En = E

(o) n +^ E

(1) n +^ E

(2) n +^...^

To find the terms in the expansions for |n〉 and En we start with the eigenvalue equation

H |n〉 = En |n〉 (2)

or

(H

o

  • H

′ )

[∣

∣n(o)

∣n(1)

∣n(2)

]

(E

(o) n +^ E

(1) n +^ E

(2) n +^.. .)^

[∣

∣n(o)

∣n(1)

∣n(2)

] (3)

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

We approach these equations as we did the perturbation of the hydrogen atom: we first

consider the zeroth-order terms of Eq. 3. We get:

H

o

∣n(o)

= E

(o) n

∣n(o)

Notice that the zeroth-order quantities

∣n(o)

and E

(o) n of^ H

′ (or, equivalently, they depend on

the zeroth power of H

′ ). By assumption, this equation may be solved and the eigenvectors ∣ ∣n(o)

and eigenvalues E

(o) n determined. So we move on to the first-order terms. We get the

equation

H

o

∣n(1)

+ H

∣n(o)

= E

(o) n

∣n(1)

+ E

(1) n

∣n(o)

Let us dot both sides with

n

(o)

∣. Using

n

(o)

∣ (^) Ho^ =

n

(o)

∣ (^) E(o) n and^

n

(o)

∣n(o)

= 1, we get

E

(1) n =^

n

(o)

∣H′

∣n(o)

i.e., the first-order change in energy is the expectation value of H

′ in the unperturbed state.

Or as it is very well put in your textbook: “This is the fundamental result of first-order

perturbation theory; as a practical matter, it may well be the most frequently used equation

in quantum mechanics.It says that the first-order correction to the energy is the expectation

value of the perturbation, in the unperturbed state.”

Notice that E

(1) n is indeed proportional to the first power of^ H

. Let us next dot both sides

of Eq. 5 with

m

(o)

∣, m 6 = n, to get

m

(o)

∣Ho

∣n(1)

m

(o)

∣H′

∣n(o)

= E

(o) n

m

(o)

∣n(1)

or

m

(o)

∣n(1)

m

(o)

∣H′

∣n(o)

E

(o) n −^ E

(o) m

Since m 6 = n, this equation determines all the components of

∣n(1)

in the eigenbasis of

H

o , except for the component parallel to

∣n(1)

in the eigenbasis of H

o , except for the

component parallel to

∣n(o)

, let’s call it

∣n

(1) ‖

. We determine it by the requirement that |n〉

is normalized to this order. In obvious notation, we have

1 = 〈n|n〉 =

n

(o)

n

(1) ⊥

n

(1) ‖

∣n(o)

∣n

(1) ⊥

∣n

(1) ‖

which leads to

n

(o)

∣n(o)

n

(1) ‖

∣n

(o)

n

(o)

∣n

(1) ‖

  • higher order (10)

or

n

(1) ‖

∣n

(o)

n

(o)

∣n

(1) ‖

  • higher order (11)

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

Fig. 1: Energy levels of a spin-1/2 particle in a uniform magnetic field.

eigenstate is

∣n(0)

, the perturbation mixes in orthogonal states

∣m(0)

; this mixing is directly

proportional to the matrix element

m

(o)

∣H′

∣n(o)

and inversely proportional to the energy

difference between the two levels, which measures the “rigidity” of the system. If for any

reason the above inequality is not fulfilled (say due to degeneracy, E

(o) n =^ E

(o) m ) we must

turn to an alternate formalism called degenerate perturbation theory to be described in later

lecture.

Some Examples

The Spin−

1 2

Example

To get a feel for what perturbation theory is and how it works, let’s go back to our old

standby: the spin− 1 / 2 problem. The usual Hamiltonian of a spin− 1 / 2 system is the po-

tential energy of the spin magnetic moment in an applied magnetic field. For an applied

magnetic field in the z-direction B~ = Bo ˆz, the Hamiltonian is:

H

o = −~μ · B~ = ωoSz ≡

ωo 0

0 −ωo

where we have defined the Larmor frequency ωo = eBo/me. The subscript zero on the

Hamiltonian indicates that this is the zeroth-order Hamiltonian (i.e., the Hamiltonian before

we apply a perturbation). The energy eigenstates of the zeroth-order Hamiltonian are the

spin up and down states |±〉 and the energy eigenvalues (zeroth-order energy eigenstates)

are:

E

(1) ± =^ ±

ℏωo

The goal of perturbation theory is to find the higher-order corrections to the energy eigen-

values and eigenstates caused by the application of a perturbation to the system. For this

spin-1/2 system, we will solve the problem exactly and then expand the solutions to discover

how perturbation series behave. Our exact solution should contain the zeroth-order solutions

shown in Eq 19 and small corrections.

The simplest way to perturb this spin system is to change the magnetic field. Any gen-

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

Fig. 2: (a) Perturbing magnetic fields and (b) the resultant Larmor frequencies.

eral change to the magnetic field can be decomposed into an additional component along

the original field in the z-direction, and an additional component perpendicular to that, as

shown in Fig. 2-(a). We write the new total field as B~ = (Bo + B 1 )ˆz + B 2 xˆ and characterize

the two additional field components by their respective Larmor frequencies ω 1 = eB 1 /me

and ω 2 = eB 2 /me. With this notation, the new Hamiltonian is

H = −~μ · B~ = (ωo + ω 1 )Sz + ω 2 Sx ≡

ωo + ω 1 ω 2

ω 2 −ωo − ω 1

It is useful to separate the new Hamiltonian H = H

o +H

′ : into the zeroth-order Hamiltonian

H

o and the perturbation Hamiltonian that we denote H

. The zeroth-order Hamiltonian is

given by Eq. 18 and the perturbation Hamiltonian is

H

ω 1 ω 2

ω 2 −ω 1

The perturbation Hamiltonian has terms along the diagonal and terms off the diagonal.

These diagonal and off-diagonal terms play important roles in perturbation theory.

We now solve for the energy eigenvalues and eigenstates of the new Hamiltonian in Eq. 20

exactly by diagonalizing the matrix for the general spin-1/2 case of a magnetic field at an

angle θ to the z-axis. We find that the Hamiltonian is proportional to the spin component

Sn along the new magnetic field direction ˆn, and can be expressed in terms of the angle θ of

the new field as:

H = ωnewSn ≡

ℏωnew

cos θ sin θ

sin θ − cos θ

where

tan θ =

ω 2

ωo + ω 1

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

In both energies, we identify the first term as the zeroth-order energy E

(o) ± given by Eq. 19,

and we note two additional terms. The first is linear or first order in the perturbation and

is equal to the corresponding diagonal term ±ℏω 1 / 2 in the perturbation Hamiltonian [Eq.

21]. The second additional term is quadratic or second order in the perturbation and is

proportional to the square of the off-diagonal term ℏω 2 / 2 in the perturbation Hamiltonian.

This general pattern of corrections is characteristic of perturbation theory, so we denote

perturbed energies as the series

En = E

(o) n +^ E

(1) n +^ E

(2) n +^...^ (29)

where the superscript indicates the order of the perturbation. We found in this spin-1/2 ex-

ample that the linear corrections arose from the diagonal terms in the perturbation Hamil-

tonian and the quadratic terms arose from the off-diagonal terms, another characteristic

pattern of general perturbation theory. In Eq. 28, the second-order energy correction due to

the off-diagonal terms has a factor of ωo in the denominator, and it will diverge if the energy

splitting ℏωo is zero, (i.e., if the original levels are degenerate in energy). This divergence

violates the assumption that the perturbation corrections are small, which creates a prob-

lem that is addressed later. In addition to these features of the perturbed energies, we can

also draw some conclusions about the perturbation corrections to the eigenstates from our

knowledge of the exact eigenstate solutions. The eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian in Eq.

22 are the spin up and down eigenstates |±〉n along the direction ˆn :

n

= cos

θ

|+〉 + sin

θ

|−〉n = − sin

θ

|+〉 + cos

θ

From Fig. 2-(a), it is evident that the angle θ is small for small perturbing magnetic fields,

so we can also use θ as a small parameter for a series expansion to second order in the angle

θ the new eigenstates have two correction terms: a first-order term that is orthogonal to

the original state, and a second-order term that is parallel (in a Hilbert space sense, not a

geometric sense) to the original state. If we neglect the parallel terms we get:

|+〉n

θ

n

= |−〉 −^

θ

Using the schematic in Fig. 2-(b), we express the small angle θ in terms of the Larmor

frequencies. To first order, we obtain:

θ

ω 2 √

(ωo + ω 1 )

2

ω 2

ωo

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

Thus, we arrive at the perturbation series expansion for the perturbed states, to first order

|+〉n

ω 2

2 ωo

|−〉n ∼= |−〉 −

ω 2

2 ωo

We conclude that the first-order eigenstate correction depends only on the off-diagonal matrix

element, not on the diagonal elements. Note that the coefficient of the original state remains

one, which makes it appear that the state is no longer normalized. But if we check the

normalization of the perturbed state:

n

[

ω 2

2 ωo

] [

ω 2

2 ωo

]

ω 2

2 ωo

we see that it is normalized to first order in the small perturbation parameters.

The Harmonic Oscillator

Why Study the Harmonic Oscillator?

In this section I will put the harmonic oscillator in its place – on a pedestal. Not only

is it a system that can be exactly solved (in classical and quantum theory) and a superb

pedagogical tool (which will be repeatedly exploited in this text), but it is also a system of

great physical relevance. As will be shown below, any system fluctuating by small amounts

near a configuration of stable equilibrium may be described either by an oscillator or by a

collection of decoupled harmonic oscillators. Since the dynamics of a collection of nonin-

teracting oscillators is no more complicated than that of a single oscillator (apart from the

obvious N-fold increase in degrees of freedom), in addressing the problem of the oscillator

we are actually confronting the general problem of small oscillations near equilibrium of an

arbitrary system.

A concrete example of a single harmonic oscillator is a mass m coupled to a spring of force

constant k. For small deformations x, the spring will exert the force given by Hooke’s law,

F = −kx, (k being its force constant) and produce a potential V =

1 2

kx

2

. The classical

Hamiltonian for this system is

Hclassical = T + V =

p

2

2 m

2 x

2 (35)

Where ω =

k/m is the classical frequency of oscillation. Any Hamiltonian of the above

form, quadratic in the coordinate and momentum, will be called the harmonic oscillator

Hamiltonian. Now, the mass-spring system is just one among a family of systems described

by the oscillator Hamiltonian.

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

Fig. 3: Perturbation of the harmonic oscillator. (a) Shifts of the first three energy levels.

(b) Dependence of the shift of the ground state energy on the perturbation strength to first

order (dotted), second order (dashed), and exact (solid).

The expectation value of the perturbation is

E

(1) n =^ ε

ℏω

n

(o)

∣a†a†^ + a†a + aa†^ + aa

∣n(o)

The operators a

† a

† and aa contribute zero because they raise or lower the state

∣n(o)

twice

and produce a new state that is orthogonal to

∣n(o)

. The remaining terms are calculated

using a |n〉 =

n |n − 1 〉 and a

† |n〉 =

n + 1 |n + 1〉; we then obtain:

E

(1) n =^ ε

ℏω

n +

The resultant energy of level n to first order in the perturbation is

En = E

(o) n +^ E

(1) n

= ℏω

n +

  • ε

ℏω

n +

= ℏω

n +

ε

Each state is shifted upwards, with the shift larger for larger states. The original and

first-order perturbed energy levels are shown in Fig. 3-(a).

Now consider the second-order energy correction

E

(2) n =^

m 6 =n

m

(o)

∣H′

∣n(o)

2

E

(o) n −^ E

(o) m

Fall 2022 Introductory Quantum Mechanics Lecture on Pert. Theory

This looks like an infinite sum, which would be problematic, but we plow ahead and find

that the sum is reduced for the harmonic oscillator case. For a given energy level n, only

two terms in the sum (m 6 = n) contribute, yielding

E

(2) n =

[

1 4

εℏω

n − 1

n

] 2

E

(o) n −^ E

(o) n− 2

[

1 4

εℏω

n + 2

n + 1

] 2

E

(o) n −^ E

(o) n+

εℏω

) 2 [

n(n − 1)

2 ℏω

(n + 1)(n + 2)

− 2 ℏω

]

ε

2 ℏω

n +

Note that the second-order contribution is negative. Only the two levels m = n + 2 and

m = n− 2 contribute to the energy correction in Eq. 46. They each have the same magnitude

energy denominators, but the matrix element is larger for the m = n + 2 state above the

state of interest, so the level is pushed down. The resultant energy of level n to second order

in the perturbation is:

En = E

(0) n +^ E

(1) n +^ E

(2) n

= ℏω

n +

ε −

ε

2

The perturbed energies to first and second order and the exact result are plotted in Fig.

3-(b) as a function of the perturbation strength.

In this example, we can find the exact answer, so we can check the perturbation result

and confirm that perturbation theory works. The exact Hamiltonian is

H = Ho + H

2

2 m

2 xˆ

2

  • ε

2 ˆx

2

2

2 m

2 xˆ

2 (1 + ε)

2

2 m

2 p xˆ

2

where we have defined a new perturbed harmonic frequency

ωp = ω

1 + ε (49)

This new Hamiltonian has the same form as the original harmonic oscillator problem, but

with a new characteristic frequency. Hence, we know the energy eigenvalues exactly. They

are

En =

n +

ℏωp =

n +

ℏω

1 + ε (50)