Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Velocity Transformations in Different Reference Frames, Lecture notes of Astrophysics

The concept of velocity transformations between different reference frames, specifically the center of mass reference frame and the laboratory frame. It covers the derivation of relative velocities, elastic and inelastic collisions, and their respective velocity changes. The document also includes examples and equations to solve for final velocities and angles in two-dimensional elastic collisions.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

francyne
francyne 🇺🇸

4.7

(21)

268 documents

1 / 18

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Chapter 15 Collision Theory
15.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1!
15.2 Reference Frames Relative and Velocities .......................................................... 1!
15.2.1 Center of Mass Reference Frame ................................................................. 2!
15.2.2 Relative Velocities .......................................................................................... 3!
15.3 Characterizing Collisions ..................................................................................... 5!
15.4 One-Dimensional Elastic Collision Between Two Objects ................................ 5!
15.4.1 One-Dimensional Collision Between Two Objects – Center of Mass
Reference Frame ....................................................................................................... 8!
15.5 Worked Examples ................................................................................................. 9!
Example 15.1 Elastic One-Dimensional Collision Between Two Objects ............ 9!
Example 15.2 The Dissipation of Kinetic Energy in a Completely Inelastic
Collision Between Two Objects ............................................................................. 10!
Example 15.3 Elastic Two-Dimensional Collision ................................................ 11!
Example 15.4 Equal Mass Particles in a Two-Dimensional Elastic Collision
Emerge at Right Angles .......................................................................................... 14!
Example 15.5 Bouncing Superballs ....................................................................... 15!
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12

Partial preview of the text

Download Velocity Transformations in Different Reference Frames and more Lecture notes Astrophysics in PDF only on Docsity!

Chapter 15 Collision Theory

  • 15.1 Introduction
  • 15.2 Reference Frames Relative and Velocities..........................................................
    • 15.2.1 Center of Mass Reference Frame
    • 15.2.2 Relative Velocities
  • 15.3 Characterizing Collisions
  • 15.4 One-Dimensional Elastic Collision Between Two Objects
    • Reference Frame 15.4.1 One-Dimensional Collision Between Two Objects – Center of Mass
  • 15.5 Worked Examples
    • Example 15.1 Elastic One-Dimensional Collision Between Two Objects
    • Collision Between Two Objects Example 15.2 The Dissipation of Kinetic Energy in a Completely Inelastic
    • Example 15.3 Elastic Two-Dimensional Collision................................................
    • Emerge at Right Angles Example 15.4 Equal Mass Particles in a Two-Dimensional Elastic Collision
    • Example 15.5 Bouncing Superballs

Chapter 15 Collision Theory

Despite my resistance to hyperbole, the LHC [Large Hadron Collider]

belongs to a world that can only be described with superlatives. It is not

merely large: the LHC is the biggest machine ever built. It is not merely

cold: the 1.9 kelvin (1.9 degrees Celsius above absolute zero) temperature

necessary for the LHC’s supercomputing magnets to operate is the coldest

extended region that we know of in the universe—even colder than outer

space. The magnetic field is not merely big: the superconducting dipole

magnets generating a magnetic field more than 100,000 times stronger than

the Earth’s are the strongest magnets in industrial production ever made.

And the extremes don’t end there. The vacuum inside the proton-containing

tubes, a 10 trillionth of an atmosphere, is the most complete vacuum over

the largest region ever produced. The energy of the collisions are the highest

ever generated on Earth, allowing us to study the interactions that occurred

in the early universe the furthest back in time.

1

Lisa Randall

15.1 Introduction

When discussing conservation of momentum, we considered examples in which two

objects collide and stick together, and either there are no external forces acting in some

direction (or the collision was nearly instantaneous) so the component of the momentum

of the system along that direction is constant. We shall now study collisions between

objects in more detail. In particular we shall consider cases in which the objects do not

stick together. The momentum along a certain direction may still be constant but the

mechanical energy of the system may change. We will begin our analysis by considering

two-particle collision. We introduce the concept of the relative velocity between two

particles and show that it is independent of the choice of reference frame. We then show

that the change in kinetic energy only depends on the change of the square of the relative

velocity and therefore is also independent of the choice of reference frame. We will then

study one- and two-dimensional collisions with zero change in potential energy. In

particular we will characterize the types of collisions by the change in kinetic energy and

analyze the possible outcomes of the collisions.

15.2 Reference Frames Relative and Velocities

We shall recall our definition of relative inertial reference frames. Let R

be the

vector from the origin of frame S^ to the origin of reference frame S^ ′. Denote the

position vector of particle i with respect to the origin of reference frame S by r i

and

1 Randall, Lisa, Knocking on Heaven's Door: How Physics and Scientific Thinking Illuminate the Universe

and the Modern World , Ecco, 2011.

respect to origin of reference frame S by

r i and similarly, denote the position vector of

particle i with respect to origin of reference frame S cm by

r cm , i (Figure 15.2).

Figure 15.2 Position vector of i

th particle in the center of mass reference frame.

The position vector of particle i in the center of mass frame is then given by

r cm , i

r i

R

cm

The velocity of particle i^ in the center of mass reference frame is then given by

v cm , i

v i

V

cm

There are many collision problems in which the center of mass reference frame is the

most convenient reference frame to analyze the collision.

15.2.2 Relative Velocities

Consider two particles of masses m 1 and m 2 interacting via some force (Figure 15.3).

Figure 15.3 Two interacting particles

Choose a coordinate system (Figure 15.4) in which the position vector of body 1 is given

by r 1

and the position vector of body 2 is given by r 2

. The relative position of body 1

with respect to body 2 is given by r 1 (^) , 2 = r 1 (^) − r 2

Figure 15.4 Coordinate system for two bodies.

During the course of the interaction, body 1 is displaced by d r 1

and body 2 is displaced

by d r 2

, so the relative displacement of the two bodies during the interaction is given by

d r 1 (^) , 2 = d r 1 (^) − d r 2

. The relative velocity between the particles is

(^1 2 1 ) 1 2 1 2

, ,

d (^) d d

dt dt dt

r (^) r r v v v

We shall now show that the relative velocity between the two particles is independent of

the choice of reference frame providing that the reference frames are relatively inertial.

The relative velocity v 1 ′ 2

in reference frame S ′ can be determined from using Eq. ( 0. 3. 4 )

to express Eq. ( 0. 3. 7 ) in terms of the velocities in the reference frame S ′,

v 1 , 2

v 1

v 2

v ′ 1 +

V ) − (

v ′ 2 +

V ) =

v 1 ′ −

v ′ 2 =

v ′ 1 , 2 ( 0. 3. 8 )

and is equal to the relative velocity in frame S.

For a two-particle interaction, the relative velocity between the two

vectors is independent of the choice of relatively inertial reference frames.

We showed in Appendix 13 A that when two particles of masses m 1 and m 2 interact, the

change of kinetic energy between the final state B and the initial state A due to the

interaction force is equal to

Δ K =

μ( v B

2 − v A

2 ) , ( 0. 3. 9 )

where v B

v 1 , 2

B

v 1

B

v 2

B denotes the relative speed in the state B and

v A

v 1 , 2

A

v 1

A

v 2

A denotes the relative speed in state A , and

μ = m 1 m 2 / ( m 1

  • m 2 ) is the reduced mass. (If the relative reference frames were non-

inertial then Eq. ( 0. 3. 9 ) would not be valid in all frames.

collides with an object of mass m 2 and initial x - component of the velocity v 2 x , i

. The

scalar components v 1 x , i and v 1 x , i can be positive, negative or zero. No forces other than

the interaction force between the objects act during the collision. After the collision, the

final x - component of the velocities are v 1 x , f and v 2 x , f

. We call this reference frame the

“laboratory reference frame”.

Figure 15. 5 One-dimensional elastic collision, laboratory reference frame

For the collision depicted in Figure 15.5, v 1 x , i

0 , v 2 x , i < 0 , v 1 x , f < 0 , and v 2 x , f

Because there are no external forces in the x - direction, momentum is constant in the x -

direction. Equating the momentum components before and after the collision gives the

relation

m 1 v 1 x , i

  • m 2 v 2 x , 0 = m 1 v 1 x , f
  • m 2 v 2 x , f

Because the collision is elastic, kinetic energy is constant. Equating the kinetic energy

before and after the collision gives the relation

m 1 v 1 x , i

2

m 2 v 2 x , i

2

m 1 v 1 x , f

2

m 2 v 2 x , f

2 ( 0. 4. 7 )

Rewrite these Eqs. ( 0. 4. 6 ) and ( 0. 4. 7 ) as

m 1 ( v 1 x , iv 1 x , f ) = m 2 ( v 2 x , fv 2 x , i

m 1 ( v 1 x , i

2 − v 1 x , f

2 ) = m 2 ( v 2 x , f

2 − v 2 x , i

2 ). ( 0. 4. 9 )

Eq. ( 0. 4. 9 ) can be written as

m 1 ( v 1 x , iv 1 x , f )( v 1 x , i

  • v 1 x , f ) = m 2 ( v 2 x , fv 2 x , i )( v 2 x , f
  • v 2 x , i

Divide Eq. ( 0. 4. 9 ) by Eq. ( 0. 4. 8 ), yielding

v 1 x , i

  • v 1 x , f = v 2 x , i
  • v 2 x , f.^ (^0.^4.^11 )

Eq. ( 0. 4. 11 ) may be rewritten as

v 1 x , iv 2 x , i = v 2 x , fv 1 x , f

Recall that the relative velocity between the two objects in state A is defined to be

v A

rel

v 1 , A

v 2 , A.^ (^0.^4.^13 )

where we used the superscript “rel” to remind ourselves that the velocity is a relative

velocity. Thus v x , i

rel = v 1 x , iv 2 x , i is the initial x - component of the relative velocity, and

v x , f

rel = v 1 x , fv 2 x , f is the final x - component of the relative velocity. Therefore Eq. ( 0. 4. 12 )

states that during the interaction the initial x - component of the relative velocity is equal

to the negative of the final x - component of the relative velocity

v x , i

rel = − v x , f

rel

. ( 0. 4. 14 )

Consequently the initial and final relative speeds are equal. We can now solve for the

final x - component of the velocities, v 1 x , f and v 2 x , f , as follows. Eq. ( 0. 4. 12 ) may be

rewritten as

v 2 x , f = v 1 x , f

  • v 1 x , iv 2 x , i

Now substitute Eq. ( 0. 4. 15 ) into Eq. ( 0. 4. 6 ) yielding

m 1 v 1 x , i

  • m 2 v 2 x , i = m 1 v 1 x , f
  • m 2 ( v 1 x , f
  • v 1 x , iv 2 x , i

Solving Eq. ( 0. 4. 16 ) for v 1 x , f involves some algebra and yields

v 1 x , f

m 1 − m 2

m 1

  • m 2

v 1 x , i

2 m 2

m 1

  • m 2

v 2 x , i

To find v 2 x , f , rewrite Eq. ( 0. 4. 12 ) as

v 1 x , f = v 2 x , fv 1 x , i

  • v 2 x , i

Now substitute Eq. ( 0. 4. 18 ) into Eq. ( 0. 4. 6 ) yielding

m 1 v 1 x , i

  • m 2 v 2 x , i = m 1 ( v 2 x , fv 1 x , i
  • v 2 x , i ) v 1 x , f
  • m 2 v 2 x , f

We can solve Eq. ( 0. 4. 19 ) for v 2 x , f and determine that

v ′ 1 x , i = v 1 x , iv x ,cm = ( v 1 x , iv 2 x , i

m 2

m 1

  • m 2

v ′ 2 x , i = v 2 x , iv x ,cm = ( v 2 x , iv 1 x , i

m 1

m 1

  • m 2

In the CM frame the momentum of the system is zero before the collision and hence the

momentum of the system is zero after the collision. For an elastic collision, the only way

for both momentum and kinetic energy to be the same before and after the collision is

either the objects have the same velocity (a miss) or to reverse the direction of the

velocities as shown in Figure 15.6.

Figure 15.6 One-dimensional elastic collision in center of mass reference frame

In the CM frame, the final x - components of the velocities are

v 1 ′ x , f = − v 1 ′ x , i = ( v 2 x , iv 1 x , i )

m 2

m 1 + m 2

v ′ 2 x , f = − v ′ 2 x , i = ( v 2 x , iv 1 x , i

m 1

m 1

  • m 2

The final x - components of the velocities in the “laboratory frame” are then given by

v 1 x , f = v ′ 1 x , f

  • v x ,cm

= ( v 2 x , iv 1 x , i

m 2

m 1

  • m 2

m 1 v 1 x , i

  • m 2 v 2 x , i

m 1

  • m 2

= v 1 x , i

m 1 − m 2

m 1 + m 2

  • v 2 x , i

2 m 2

m 1 + m 2

as in Eq. ( 0. 4. 17 ) and a similar calculation reproduces Eq. ( 0. 4. 20 ).

15.5 Worked Examples

Example 15.1 Elastic One-Dimensional Collision Between Two Objects

Consider the elastic collision of two carts along a track; the incident cart 1 has mass m 1

and moves with initial speed v 1 , i

. The target cart has mass m 2 = 2 m 1 and is initially at

rest, v 2 , i = 0. Immediately after the collision, the incident cart has final speed v 1 , f and the

target cart has final speed v 2 , f

. Calculate the final x - component of the velocities of the

carts as a function of the initial speed v 1 , i

Solution Draw a “momentum flow” diagram for the objects before (initial state) and after

(final state) the collision (Figure 15.7).

Figure 15.7 Momentum flow diagram for elastic one-dimensional collision

We can immediately use our results above with m 2 = 2 m 1 and v 2 , i = 0. The final x -

component of velocity of cart 1 is given by Eq. ( 0. 4. 17 ), where we use v 1 x , i = v 1 , i

v 1 x , f = −

v 1 , i. ( 0. 4. 29 )

The final x - component of velocity of cart 2 is given by Eq. ( 0. 4. 20 )

v 2 x , f

v 1 , i

Example 1 5.2 The Dissipation of Kinetic Energy in a Completely Inelastic Collision

Between Two Objects

An incident object of mass m 1 and initial speed v 1 , i collides completely inelastically with

an object of mass m 2 that is initially at rest. There are no external forces acting on the

objects in the direction of the collision. Find Δ K / K initial = ( K final − K initial ) / K initial.

unknown angle θ 2 , f (as shown in the Figure 15.8). Find the final speeds of each of the

objects and the angle θ 2 , f

Figure 15.8 Momentum flow diagram for two-dimensional elastic collision

Solution: The components of the total momentum

p i

sys = m 1

v 1 , i

  • m 2

v 2 , i in the initial state

are given by

p x , i

sys = m 1 v 1 , i

p y , i

sys = 0.

The components of the momentum

p f

sys = m 1

v 1 , f

  • m 2

v 2 , f in the final state are given by

p x , f

sys = m 1 v 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

  • m 1 v 2 , f cos θ 2 , f

p y , f

sys = m 1 v 1 , f sin θ 1 , fm 1 v 2 , f sin θ 2 , f

There are no any external forces acting on the system, so each component of the total

momentum remains constant during the collision,

px ,i

sys = px , f

sys ( 0. 4. 37 )

py , i

sys = py , f

sys

. ( 0. 4. 38 )

Eqs. ( 0. 4. 37 ) and ( 0. 4. 37 ) become

m 1 v 1 , i = m 1 v 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

  • m 1 v 2 , f cos θ 2 , f

0 = m 1 v 1 , f sin θ 1 , fm 1 v 2 , f sin θ 2 , f

The collision is elastic and therefore the system kinetic energy of is constant

K

i

sys = K f

sys

. ( 0. 4. 40 )

Using the given information, Eq. ( 0. 4. 40 ) becomes

m 1 v 1 , i

2

m 1 v 1 , f

2

m 1 v 2 , f

2

. ( 0. 4. 41 )

We have three equations: two momentum equations and one energy equation, with three

unknown quantities, v 1 , f , v 2 , f and^ θ 2 , f because we are given v 1 , i =^ 3.0^ m^ ⋅s

− 1 and

θ 1 , f

o

. We first rewrite the expressions in Eq. ( 0. 4. 39 ), canceling the factor of m 1 , as

v 2 , f cos θ 2 , f = v 1 , iv 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

v 2 , f sin θ 2 , f = v 1 , f sin θ 1 , f

We square each expressions in Eq. ( 0. 4. 42 ), yielding

v 2 , f

2 (cos θ 2 , f

2 = v 1 , f

2 − 2 v 1 , i v 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

  • v 1 , f

2 (cos θ 1 , f

2 ( 0. 4. 43 )

v 2 , f

2 (sin θ 2 , f

2 = v 1 , f

2 (sin θ 1 , f

2 ( 0. 4. 44 )

We now add together Eqs. ( 0. 4. 43 ) and ( 0. 4. 44 ) yielding

v 2 , f

2 (cos

2 θ 2 , f

  • sin

2 θ 2 , f ) = v 1 , f

2 − 2 v 1 , i v 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

  • v 1 , f

2 (cos θ 1 , f

  • sin

2 θ 1 , f

We can use identity cos

2 θ + sin

2 θ = 1 to simplify Eq. ( 0. 4. 45 ), yielding

v 2 , f

2 = v 1 , i

2 − 2 v 1 , i v 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

  • v 1 , f

2

. ( 0. 4. 46 )

Substituting Eq. ( 0. 4. 46 ) into Eq. ( 0. 4. 41 ) yields

m 1 v 1 , i

2

m 1 v 1 , f

2

m 1 ( v 1 , i

2 − 2 v 1 , i v 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

  • v 1 , f

2 ). ( 0. 4. 47 )

Eq. ( 0. 4. 47 ) simplifies to

0 = 2 v 1 , f

2 − 2 v 1 , i v 1 , f cos θ 1 , f

which may be solved for the final speed of object 1,

p i

sys

p f

sys , ( 0. 4. 54 )

which becomes

m 1

v 1 , i = m 1

v 1 , f + m 1

v 2 , f. ( 0. 4. 55 )

Eq. ( 0. 4. 55 ) simplifies to  v 1 , i

v 1 , f

v 2 , f

Recall the vector identity that the square of the speed is given by the dot product

2 vv = v

. With this identity in mind, we take the dot product of each side of Eq. ( 0. 4. 56 )

with itself,

v 1 , i

v 1 , i

v 1 , f

v 2 , f

v 1 , f

v 2 , f

v 1 , f

v 1 , f

v 1 , f

v 2 , f

v 2 , f

v 2 , f

This becomes

v 1 , i

2 = v 1 , f

2

  • 2

v 1 , f

v 2 , f

  • v 2 , f

2

. ( 0. 4. 58 )

Recall that kinetic energy is the same before and after an elastic collision, and the masses

of the two objects are equal, so Eq. ( 0. 4. 41 ) simplifies to

v 1 , i

2 = v 1 , f

2

  • v 2 , f

2

. ( 0. 4. 59 )

Comparing Eq. ( 0. 4. 58 ) with Eq. ( 0. 4. 59 ), we see that

v 1 (^) , fv 2 , f = 0

The dot product of two nonzero vectors is zero when the two vectors are at right angles to

each other justifying our claim that the collision particles emerge at right angles to each

other.

Example 15.5 Bouncing Superballs

Two superballs are dropped from a height h i above the ground, one on top of the other.

Ball 1 is on top and has mass m 1 , and ball 2 is underneath and has mass m 2 with

m 2

m 1

. Assume that there is no loss of kinetic energy during all collisions. Ball 2 first

collides with the ground and rebounds. Then, as ball 2 starts to move upward, it collides

with the ball 1 which is still moving downwards. How high will ball 1 rebound in the air?

Hint: consider this collision as seen by an observer moving upward with the same speed

as the ball 2 has after it collides with ground (Figure 15.9). What speed does ball 1 have

in this reference frame after it collides with the ball 2?

Solution: The system consists of the two balls and the earth. There are five special states

for this motion shown in the figure above.

Initial state: the balls are released from rest at a height h i above the ground.

State A: the balls just reach the ground with speed v 1 , A = v 2 , A = v A = 2 gh i

State B: ball 2 has collided with the ground and reversed direction with the same speed,

v 2 , B = v A , and ball 1 is still moving down with speed v 1 , B = v A

State C: because we are assuming that m 2

m 1 , ball 2 does not change speed as a result

of the collision so it is still moving upward with speed v 2 , C = vA. As a result of the

collision, ball 1 moves upward with speed v 1 , C.

Final State: ball 1 reaches a maximum height h f = v b

2 / 2 g above the ground.

Figure 15.9 States in superball collisions

Choice of Reference Frame: For states B and C, the collision is best analyzed from the

reference frame of an observer moving upward with speed v A , the speed of ball 2 just

after it rebounded from the ground. In this frame ball 1 is moving downward with a speed

v ′ 1 , B that is twice the speed seen by an observer at rest on the ground (lab reference

frame).

v ′ 1 , B = 2 v A