



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Notes; Class: DEVEL OF SCIENCE; Subject: Honors; University: University of Nevada - Las Vegas; Term: Unknown 1989;
Typology: Study notes
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
As we noted last time, the first systematic philosopher with the first systematic theory ff nature was Plato (born 427 BCE). From Athens, a wealthy aristocratic family. Originated western philosophy, especially western political philosophy. Great story -- Syracuse. Dionysius I, II. I. As we also noted last time, he has a peculiar deflationary attitude toward the natural world. A. He denigrated it. That is, he didn't think that it was the highest object of study because it didn't have the highest possible level of existence. B. We illustrated this by recalling the allegory of the cave.
make possible the existence of concrete things in a way that doesn't work the other way around. And this is what makes them more real. D. Thus, true knowledge, for Plato, was a movement from the concrete to the abstract. II. How can we think about this in a way that keeps it from sounding too mystical? A. Think about the relation between the shadow and the puppet. The puppet explains why the shadow exists; it makes the occurrence of the shadow explicable or intelligible to us. Let's think more about this "making intelligible" relation. What is it supposed to be? Perhaps it's pretty clear in the case of the puppet/shadow case. What is it here? B. What is it in the case of the horse/form of horse case? Not causal, right? Let's look at some of the examples that Plato cites in which he tries to explain what it is.
(e) The beauty of knowledge - Once proceeding down this path, the lover will naturally long for that which produces and makes intelligible good social institutions: knowledge. (f) Beauty itself - This is the platonic "form" of beauty itself. It is not a particular thing that is beautiful, but is instead the essence of beauty. Plato describes this level of love as a "wondrous vision," an "everlasting loveliness which neither comes nor ages, which neither flowers nor fades." It is eternal and isn't "anything that is of the flesh" nor "words" nor "knowledge" but consists "of itself and by itself in an eternal oneness, while every lovely thing partakes of it." (g) Even above this is the form of the Good. The form of beauty is itself a good to the extent that it participates in the form of the good. The form of the good, we may say, is really, really, really real. (What could be clearer than this?)
knowledge of the thing by having familiarity with its defining essence.