Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Limited Partnership and Liability: Recovering Compensation from a General Partner, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Civil Law

The concept of limited partnership and the liability of general and limited partners. It discusses a case where Gold Dust Graphics can recover compensation from Bobby, who is a limited partner in Typecast Limited Partnership but also the sole shareholder and president of Live Magazine Inc., the general partner of Typecast. how Live Magazine is personally liable for the liabilities of Typecast and how Gold Dust can recover the compensation from Bobby.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2020/2021

Available from 11/01/2022

answers.z
answers.z 🇮🇳

11 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Answer 1
Yes, Gold Dust can recover the compensation of $50,000 granted as per the judgment from
Bobby. However, it is crucial to note that the money can be recovered not from Bobby in his
capacity of a limited partner in Typecast but by the fact that he is the sole shareholder and
president of Live Magazine Inc., that in turn is the General Partner of Typecast Limited
Partnership.
Typecast Limited Partnership is a Limited Partnership. Limited Partnership is a unique form
of partnership wherein there are two types of partners with differing roles and liabilities. An
Limited partnership constitutes of general partner(s) and at least one limited partner. General
partners have the full management control of the business operations but also have unlimited
liability in case of the business’ default or debt. A limited Partner, at the other hand, is not
involved in the day-to-day operations of the business but is a partner by virtue of his
investments in the said business. A limited partner does not have unlimited liability and
his/her liability is restricted to the monetary value of the investments the limited partner has
made in the business. As in the case of Typecast itself, a limited partnership can have any
person or entity such as a company or corporation as a General Partner (Live Magazine in the
present case). This implies that Live Magazine being the general partner of Typecast Limited
Partnership is personally liable for the liability of the limited partnership to compensate in
accordance with the judgment.
As Bobby was the one acting as manager when dealing with Gold Dust Graphics and it is due
to his failure to perform the duties undertaken in the contract, that Gold Dust sued Typecast
and got a judgment in its favour. In the present case, Bobby is a limited partner in Typecast
and therefore is only liable to extent of his investment in the limited partnership as a limited
partner. However, Bobby is also is the single partner of Live Magazine, a general partner of
Typecast Limited Partnership and is therefore personally liable for the liabilities of Live
Magazine ( lifting the corporate veil of the corporation) as the corporation has insufficient
assets to satisfy the claims and therefore it is possible for Gold Dust Graphics to recover the
$50,000 awarded in the judgment from him.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Limited Partnership and Liability: Recovering Compensation from a General Partner and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Civil Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Answer 1 Yes, Gold Dust can recover the compensation of $50,000 granted as per the judgment from Bobby. However, it is crucial to note that the money can be recovered not from Bobby in his capacity of a limited partner in Typecast but by the fact that he is the sole shareholder and president of Live Magazine Inc., that in turn is the General Partner of Typecast Limited Partnership. Typecast Limited Partnership is a Limited Partnership. Limited Partnership is a unique form of partnership wherein there are two types of partners with differing roles and liabilities. An Limited partnership constitutes of general partner(s) and at least one limited partner. General partners have the full management control of the business operations but also have unlimited liability in case of the business’ default or debt. A limited Partner, at the other hand, is not involved in the day-to-day operations of the business but is a partner by virtue of his investments in the said business. A limited partner does not have unlimited liability and his/her liability is restricted to the monetary value of the investments the limited partner has made in the business. As in the case of Typecast itself, a limited partnership can have any person or entity such as a company or corporation as a General Partner (Live Magazine in the present case). This implies that Live Magazine being the general partner of Typecast Limited Partnership is personally liable for the liability of the limited partnership to compensate in accordance with the judgment. As Bobby was the one acting as manager when dealing with Gold Dust Graphics and it is due to his failure to perform the duties undertaken in the contract, that Gold Dust sued Typecast and got a judgment in its favour. In the present case, Bobby is a limited partner in Typecast and therefore is only liable to extent of his investment in the limited partnership as a limited partner. However, Bobby is also is the single partner of Live Magazine, a general partner of Typecast Limited Partnership and is therefore personally liable for the liabilities of Live Magazine ( lifting the corporate veil of the corporation) as the corporation has insufficient assets to satisfy the claims and therefore it is possible for Gold Dust Graphics to recover the $50,000 awarded in the judgment from him.

Answer 2 There are a few concerns relating to Janis’ request for lending $20,000 as loan to cover the start-up costs for his new business. The first major concern is the type of business structure Janis has chosen. Janis wants to set up a corporation for carrying on the business. A Corporation has a separate legal existence and therefore would result in many problems in recovering the money lent, in case of default by the corporation. Though Janis is a wealthy person, his assets would be protected as the shareholder of a corporation has no liability for a corporation’s obligations. Moreover, it will be difficult and expensive to approach the Court and convince the judge to lift the corporate veil in order to claim the lent amount from Janis. Moreover, as there is no other shareholder in the corporation, it is all the more difficult to recover the money in case of default. The potential income or revenue of the business is also not so much to raise the business’ valuation or its ability to repay the loan. The second major concern is the type of business that Janis plans to set up. Janis plans to run a gelato business from a kiosk at a local skating ring. From a creditors or lender’s perspective this means that the business would not have any considerable assets that could satisfy the Bank’s claim in case of default by corporation. The business would not have sufficient valuation as it would not be needing much tangible assets like real estate or machineries etc. Additionally, there would not be any collateral available with the corporation. These concerns may be addressed by bringing changes in either the type of business structure chosen. If Janis wants the $20,000 for start-up cost, I would suggest him to opt for either a sole-proprietorship or a partnership so that it would be possible for the bank to make the owner or general partner personally liable in case of default by the business. Alternatively, the bank can ask for Janis to keep some collateral or pass on the right to sell the assets of the corporation in case of default. The bank can also ask for equity shares but Janis won’t be comfortable for issuing the same, in this case the bank can ask for preferred shares worth $20,000 so that it could potentially profit from the business as well as secure its money in case the business goes bankrupt or dissolved.