



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
In this document, learn how to locate the y-intercept and x-intercepts of a parabola by applying the concepts of setting x or y equal to zero and using the quadratic formula. Understand the relationship between the discriminant and the number of solutions or x-intercepts.
Typology: Slides
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Earlier, we learned how to sketch the graph of a parabola f x = a x − h + k
2 ( ) ( ) :
2 y = x ; if | a |< 1 , make the
parabola wider than
2 y = x ; if | a |= 1 , leave the parabola as wide as
2 y = x.
In the last lesson, we learned how to locate the vertex even if the function is given in standard form
g x = ax + bx + c
2 ( ). However, there is still an issue: If | a |≠ 1 , we don't know exactly how much
thinner or wider the graph should become.
In this lesson, we will learn how to make our sketched parabolas more accurate by locating its y -
intercept and x -intercept(s), if any.
Let's review how to find the y -intercept of y = 2 x + 3. I hope you didn't simply memorized that the "3"
is the y -value of the line's y -intercept.
Since a function's y -intercept crosses the y -axis, its x value must be 0―otherwise the point would not be
on the y -axis. This is why, to find a function's y-intercept, we plug x = 0 into the equation and then
solve for y. For y = 2 x + 3 , we have:
y = 2 ⋅ 0 + 3 = 3
This is why the y -intercept of y = 2 x + 3 is ( 0 , 3 ).
We apply the same rule to find a quadratic function's y -intercept.
[ Example 1 ] Find the y -intercept of ( ) 3 2 10
2 p x = x − x + and ( ) 3 ( 2 ) 10
2 q x = x − +.
[ Solution ] To find a function's y -intercept, we plug in x = 0. We have:
2 p = ⋅ − ⋅ + = , and
2 2 q = − + = ⋅ + =.
Solution: The y -intercept of p ( x )is ( 0 , 10 ), and the y -intercept of q ( x )is ( 0 , 22 ).
Note that any function can have at most one y -intercept. If a function has two y -intercepts, say ( 0 , 1 )
and ( 0 , 2 ), it implies the function has two output values when the input is 0, and that would disqualify
the relationship as a function.
For a parabola, it always has one and only one y -intercept.
A parabola could have two, one or no x -intercepts. See the graph below:
Figure 1: parabolas have different number of x-intercepts
In this graph, the parabola at the top has no x -intercepts; the one in the middle has one x -intercept:
( 2 , 0 ); the one at the bottom has two x -intercepts: ( 1 , 0 )and ( 3 , 0 ).
Since a function's x -intercept is always on the x -axis, its y -value must be 0. We can clearly see this in
Figure 1. The strategy to find a function's x -intercept is to plug in y = 0 and then solve for x.
In the following examples, we will try to find the x -intercept(s) of those 3 functions in Figure 1 (pretend
you don't know them yet).
The left side of this equation can be factored, so we have:
1 or 3
1 0 or 3 0
x x
x x
x x
There are two solutions, x = 1 and x = 3 , for 4 3 0
2 x − x + = , implying the function
2 h x = x − x + has two x -intercept: (1, 0) and (3, 0). Figure 1 verifies this result.
Earlier, we learned that a quadratic equation's discriminant, b 4 ac
2 − , determines the equation has 2, 1
or 0 solutions.
In this lesson, we just learned that a quadratic function can have 2, 1 or 0 x -intercept.
Is there a relationship between these two observations? Let's look at this table.
Example 2 Example 3 Example 4
quadratic function (^) f ( x )= x^2 − 4 x + 5 g ( x )= x^2 − 4 x + 4 h ( x )= x^2 − 4 x + 3
quadratic equation (^) x^2 − 4 x + 5 = 0 x^2^ − 4 x + 4 = 0 x^2 − 4 x + 3 = 0
value of discriminant (^) b^2 − 4 ac =− 4 b^2 − 4 ac = 0 b^2 − 4 ac = 4
solutions none (^) x = 2 x = 1 and x = 3
x-intercepts none (2, 0) (1, 0) and (3, 0)
Please take time to understand the following important relationships:
2 ax + bx + c = , we are actually looking for the x -
intercepts of the quadratic function q x = ax + bx + c
2 ( ).
2 b − ac > , the equation 0
2 ax + bx + c = has two solutions, and the quadratic
function q x = ax + bx + c
2 ( ) has two x -intercepts. This is the case for h ( x )in Figure 1.
2 b − ac = , the equation 0
2 ax + bx + c = has one solution, and the quadratic
function q x = ax + bx + c
2 ( ) has one x -intercept. The graph of q ( x )touches the x -axis at one
point, like g ( x )in Figure 1.
2 b − ac < , the equation 0
2 ax + bx + c = has no real solution, and the quadratic
function q x = ax + bx + c
2 ( ) has not x -intercept. The whole graph of q ( x )is either above or
below the x -axis, like f ( x )in Figure 1.
Studying mathematics is about understanding these relationships.
Let's look at one more example, where the parabola is given in vertex form.
[ Example 5 ] Find the x -intercept(s) of ( ) 2 ( 3 ) 8
2 f x = x + −.
[ Solution ] To find f ( x )'s x -intercepts, plug in f ( x )= 0 , and we have:
2
2
x
f x x
It's not wise to multiply out
2 ( x + 3 ) and then deal with a big mess. Instead, we will use the square root
property:
2
2
2
2
x
x
x
x
Since 4 > 0 , we can square root both sides and have:
1 or 5
3 2 or 3 2
x x
x x
x
x
Solution : ( ) 2 ( 3 ) 8
2 f x = x + − 's x -intercepts are (− 1 , 0 )and (− 5 , 0 ).
Look at the step
2 4 = ( x + 3 ). In some other problem, at this step, you would see something like
2 − 4 =( x + 3 ). Since
2 ( x + 3 ) cannot generate a negative number, at this step, we can claim that the
parabola has no x -intercepts.