Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Logical Fallacies: Understanding Common Errors in Reasoning, Study notes of Reasoning

An overview of common logical fallacies, which are errors in reasoning that lead to invalid conclusions. Various types of fallacies such as ad hominem, bandwagon appeal, begging the question, either/or thinking, false analogy, generalization, hypostatization, non sequitur, post hoc thinking, quick fix, red herring, slippery slope, and straw man. Students and writers are encouraged to identify and eliminate these fallacies in their arguments.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

abha
abha 🇺🇸

4.7

(9)

249 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Logical Fallacies
A logical fallacy is an argumentative statement that appears to be valid but upon examination
has serious flaws; “errors in reasoning that lead to invalid conclusions.” Writers would be
encouraged to search their argument for these types of flaws and eliminate them.
Ad Hominem (to the man): the writer attacks the opponent’s character rather than the
argument.
Example: "I'm sure the good senator would have a better response to our fiscal proposition if
he'd spent more time studying the issues and less time cheating on his wife."
Bandwagon appeal: the writer validates a point by saying that "everyone believes this."
Example: "All right-minded people agree that Chrysler is a superior car company." (Bandwagon
usually uses 'in-group' tactics, suggesting that if you want to be right-minded, or smart, or
beautiful--you will do what other smart, beautiful people do.)
Begging the Question: the writer presents as truth that which is supposed to be proven by the
argument.
Example: All useless bills such as Reform BilI 13 should be repealed.
Either/Or Thinking: when the writer suggests that there are only two sides to an issue: right
and wrong.
Example: If colleges cancel need-based scholarships, underprivileged children will not be able
to attend college. (Many underprivileged children would still qualify for academic and ability-
based scholarships.)
False Analogy: an extended comparison used as proof that does not satisfy the argument
requirements because the two items being compared do not have a valid relationship.
Example: Putting teenagers in sex-education classes is like taking an alcoholic to a bar. (Are the
things being compared even similar? Does that prove anything?)
Generalization: conclusions are drawn from a sample that is too small.
Example: I have had two poodles. Both have attacked me. Poodles are vicious dogs.
Hypostatization: uses abstract concepts as if they were concrete reality.
Examples: "History has taught us... " or "Science has proven ..." (suggests that all scientists and
historians agree and that all people have learned the same lesson.)
Non Sequitur (it doesn’t follow): conclusion is not a logical result of the facts.
Example: She’s a good mathematician; she’ll make a good math teacher.
Post Hoc Thinking (post hoc, ergo propter hoc: after this, therefore because of this): this
fallacy occurs when one assumes that because one event follows another in time, the first event
caused the second.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Logical Fallacies: Understanding Common Errors in Reasoning and more Study notes Reasoning in PDF only on Docsity!

Logical Fallacies

A logical fallacy is an argumentative statement that appears to be valid but upon examination has serious flaws; “errors in reasoning that lead to invalid conclusions.” Writers would be encouraged to search their argument for these types of flaws and eliminate them. Ad Hominem (to the man): the writer attacks the opponent’s character rather than the argument. Example : "I'm sure the good senator would have a better response to our fiscal proposition if he'd spent more time studying the issues and less time cheating on his wife." Bandwagon appeal : the writer validates a point by saying that "everyone believes this." Example: "All right-minded people agree that Chrysler is a superior car company." (Bandwagon usually uses 'in-group' tactics, suggesting that if you want to be right-minded, or smart, or beautiful--you will do what other smart, beautiful people do.) Begging the Question: the writer presents as truth that which is supposed to be proven by the argument. Example: All useless bills such as Reform BilI 13 should be repealed. Either/Or Thinking: when the writer suggests that there are only two sides to an issue: right and wrong. Example : If colleges cancel need-based scholarships, underprivileged children will not be able to attend college. (Many underprivileged children would still qualify for academic and ability- based scholarships.) False Analogy : an extended comparison used as proof that does not satisfy the argument requirements because the two items being compared do not have a valid relationship. Example : Putting teenagers in sex-education classes is like taking an alcoholic to a bar. (Are the things being compared even similar? Does that prove anything?) Generalization: conclusions are drawn from a sample that is too small. Example : I have had two poodles. Both have attacked me. Poodles are vicious dogs. Hypostatization: uses abstract concepts as if they were concrete reality. Examples: "History has taught us... " or "Science has proven ..." (suggests that all scientists and historians agree and that all people have learned the same lesson.) Non Sequitur (it doesn’t follow): conclusion is not a logical result of the facts. Example: She’s a good mathematician; she’ll make a good math teacher. Post Hoc Thinking (post hoc, ergo propter hoc: after this, therefore because of this): this fallacy occurs when one assumes that because one event follows another in time, the first event caused the second.

Example : You pass by a black cat. A safe falls on your head. You conclude that black cats are bad luck. Many superstitions are the result of post hoc fallacies. Quick fix: using catchy phrases or popular expressions to motivate readers to believe your point. Example: "Technology in the classroom prepares students for life-long learning in the global marketplace of the 21st Century.” Red Herring : an irrelevant point to divert the reader's attention from the main issue. Example: Your mom thinks you spend too much time playing video games. You bring up that she spends too much time shopping. The shopping is a red herring, since the original issue was video games. Slippery Slope: suggestion that a minor action will lead to major and sometimes ludicrous consequences. Example: If you give in every time your baby cries and he always gets what he wants, he will end up in prison because you never set any limits. Straw Man: an attack on the opposition at its weakest or most insignificant point of contention. Example : You rob a pharmacy of $7000 and a bottle of pills for your sick daughter. At your trial, you say that your daughter needed the medicine, or she would have died. You do not mention the $7000. This is a straw man because the pharmacy is probably more interested in the money than the pills for the sick daughter.