Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

LSAT_LG I Session Materials Part One LSAT Reasoning LSAT Reasoning REFLECTION (GRADED A), Exercises of Law

LSAT_LG I Session Materials Part One LSAT Reasoning LSAT Reasoning REFLECTION (COMPLETE CHAPTERS)

Typology: Exercises

2024/2025

Available from 10/11/2024

ProfGoodluck
ProfGoodluck 🇺🇸

3.9

(8)

1.6K documents

1 / 115

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
11
CHAPTER 1
LSAT Reasoning
Welcome to your LSAT studies! By the time you reach the end of this book, you’ll have practiced all of the
skills and strategies necessary to master the LSAT. While it is common to divide the LSAT into sections
and further divide those sections into question types, there are core thinking, reading, and reasoning
skills rewarded throughout the test. In this chapter, you’ll build important critical thinking and reasoning
skills that lay the groundwork for all that is to come.
LEVELS OF TRUTH
Prepare
Every section of the LSAT rewards an ability to distinguish correct answers based on what must be true,
what is possible (could be true or false), and what must be false.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
In this section, you’ll learn to:
· Characterize the levels of truth in statements (and thus of the correct and
incorrect answers in various LSAT question stems)
The following chart shows how central this skill is to your LSAT performance.
All LSAT Questions
Questions
Testing Levels
of Tr uth
*PrepTests 66–80; released 2012–2016
42%
01_LSAT_LB_Ch01.indd 11 11/16/17 11:36 AM
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64

Partial preview of the text

Download LSAT_LG I Session Materials Part One LSAT Reasoning LSAT Reasoning REFLECTION (GRADED A) and more Exercises Law in PDF only on Docsity!

CH A P T E R 1

LSAT Reasoning

Welcome to your LSAT studies! By the time you reach the end of this book, you’ll have practiced all of the skills and strategies necessary to master the LSAT. While it is common to divide the LSAT into sections and further divide those sections into question types, there are core thinking, reading, and reasoning skills rewarded throughout the test. In this chapter, you’ll build important critical thinking and reasoning skills that lay the groundwork for all that is to come.

LEVELS OF TRUTH

Prepare

Every section of the LSAT rewards an ability to distinguish correct answers based on what must be true, what is possible (could be true or false), and what must be false.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

In this section, you’ll learn to:

· Characterize the levels of truth in statements (and thus of the correct and incorrect answers in various LSAT question stems)

The following chart shows how central this skill is to your LSAT performance.

All LSAT Questions

Questions Testing Levels of Truth

*PrepTests 66–80; released 2012–

42%

CHAPTER 1

Characterizing Levels of Truth

Review how an LSAT expert characterizes the truth value of the correct and incorrect answers in two standard LSAT question stems.

Question Stem Analysis

Which one of the following must be true? (^) → Right answers: Must be true Wrong answers: Could be false or must be false

Each of the following must be false EXCEPT (^) → Right answers: Could be true or must be true Wrong answers: Must be false

To understand how the expert characterized the answer choices, look at this chart.

Degree of Certainty →^ “Charge”

Must True Could False

For all LSAT questions that ask for what must be true, could be true, could be false , or must be false , the correct answer combines one degree of certainty with one of the charges. The incorrect answers will combine the other degree of certainty to the other charge.

TEST DAY TIP

Any statement that must be true, could be true. Any statement that must be false, could be false. If the LSAT asks for a correct answer that must be false , you know the four wrong answers could be true , and thus, any answer that must be true is a wrong answer in that question.

Learning to characterize the correct and incorrect answer choices is the LSAT’s most direct way of testing your ability to distinguish levels of truth, but the testmaker rewards this skill on statements made by the authors of Logical Reasoning arguments and Reading Comprehension passages as well.

LSAT STRATEGY

The LSAT always gives you exactly one right answer, so there’s only ever one answer that falls into the level of truth targeted by the question stem.

CHAPTER 1

Expert Analysis

Here’s how an LSAT expert would characterize those question stems.

Question Stem Analysis

  1. Which of the following could be false? (^) → Correct answer: Could be false Wrong answers: Must be true
  2. Manny must accept each of the following contract bids EXCEPT

→ Correct answer: A bid Manny could refuse Wrong answers: Bids Manny must accept

  1. Each of the following conflicts with the company guidelines EXCEPT (^) →

Correct answer: An action that does not conflict with the company guidelines Wrong answers: Actions that conflict with the company guidelines

  1. Which of the following pieces CANNOT be included in the performance? (^) →

Correct answer: A piece that cannot be included in the performance Wrong answers: Pieces that could be included in the performance

  1. If the statements above are true, each of the following could also be true EXCEPT

→ Correct answer: Must be false Wrong answers: Could be true

  1. If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true?

→ Correct answer: Must be true Wrong answers: Could be false

  1. Each of the following could be false EXCEPT (^) → Correct answer: Must be true Wrong answers: Could be false

LSAT Reasoning

Perform

For each of the following, make a note of which level or levels of truth the correct answer must display. Then make a note of which level or levels of truth the wrong answer choices will display.

Question Stem My Analysis

  1. Rich could attend each of the following lectures EXCEPT →
  2. Which of the following must be the chairperson assigned to speak fourth? →
  3. Which of the following is an acceptable arrangement of the items, from left to right? →
  4. Which of the following entrees CANNOT be served at the dinner party? →
  5. Which of the following CANNOT be properly inferred from the statements above? →
  6. If Kate joins the study, each of the following must also join the study EXCEPT →
  7. If Nina does not go to the park, then which of the following could be false? →
  8. Each of the following must be false EXCEPT

LSAT Reasoning

REFLECTION

Every time you practice LSAT problems in this book, pause afterward and look over your practice to learn more. Don’t speed through this step. Carefully reviewing your practice can enrich your understanding of:

  • Why is a right answer right? Maybe you got a question right for the wrong reasons, and you need to clarify your understanding.
  • Why are the wrong answers wrong? Maybe your intuition told you an answer was wrong, but you couldn’t explain why or replicate your thinking.
  • Which of your LSAT skills are strong and which do you still need to work on?
  • What patterns do the LSAT questions display? The best thing you can do on the LSAT is to spot its patterns; through frequent and thorough review you’ll be able to do so.

For the exercises you just completed, look back at your work and think about these questions:

  • Where was it easier to correctly identify the level of truth being asked for?
  • Once the level of truth in the correct answer had been identified, did you always take a moment to think about and characterize the levels of truth that would be displayed by the wrong answers?
  • What was challenging about this exercise?

TEST DAY TIP

On the LSAT, never confuse true and false statements with right and wrong answers. Always characterize what you’re looking for before you evaluate the answer choices. You may even find it helpful to jot down what you’re looking for. For example, in a “Must Be False” question you could jot down “1 MBF / 4 CBT” to signify there is one correct answer that must be false and four incorrect answers that could be true.

CHAPTER 1

DETERMINING WHAT MUST BE TRUE, WHAT MUST BE FALSE, AND WHAT

COULD BE TRUE OR FALSE FROM A SET OF STATEMENTS

Prepare

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

In this section, you’ll learn to:

· (^) Determine what must be true, what could be true or false, and what must be false given a set of statements

In all sections of the LSAT, you will be asked to deduce what must, could, and cannot be true based on statements or rules presented by the testmaker. Often, you will need to combine statements to make the relevant inferences. Take a look at a brief example.

Set of Premises Analysis

(1) Ainsley owns at least two red shirts. (2) Ainsley has worn every shirt she owns. Determine the level of truth for each of the following statements: Must be true; could be true or false; or must be false Ainsley owns a blue shirt. (^) → Could be true or false: No information has been given on blue shirts. Ainsley has worn a red shirt. (^) → Must be true: She owns red shirts and has worn every shirt she owns. Ainsley owns four red shirts. →

Could be true or false: The statement does not specify that she owns exactly two red shirts—she could own more. Ainsley owns red shirts she has never worn. (^) → Must be false: She has worn every shirt she owns.

LSAT STRATEGY

When two statements contain the same term(s), ask how the statements are related and how information in one defines or limits the information in the other.

CHAPTER 1

Expert Analysis

Here’s how an LSAT expert would have analyzed the premises and determined the levels of truth for the statements in the preceding exercise.

Premises and Possible Deductions Analysis

(1) Bob’s fruit stand sells blueberries but not kiwis.

Deductions: Today, I bought blueberries and every day I buy blueberries, I buy kiwis. Thus, I must have bought kiwis today. Since Bob’s fruit stand does not sell kiwis, I must have bought at least some fruit from a location other than Bob’s fruit stand. I may have purchased my blueberries and strawberries from Bob’s (the first statement doesn’t say blueberries are the only fruit Bob’s sells), or I may have gotten all of my fruit elsewhere.

(2) Every day I buy blueberries, I also buy kiwis.

(3) Today, I bought blueberries and strawberries.

Determine the level of truth for each of the following statements: Must be true; could be true or false; or must be false

  1. Today, I bought fruit from Bob’s fruit stand.

This could be true or false. While Bob’s fruit stand does NOT sell at least one of the items purchased (kiwis), no statement requires me to purchase all of my fruit from the same place. It is possible I bought some fruit from Bob’s.

  1. Today, I bought fruit from some place other than Bob’s fruit stand. →

This must be true. I purchased blueberries today, which means I also purchased kiwis; however, Bob’s fruit stand does not sell kiwis, which means I must have purchased them from some place other than Bob’s fruit stand.

  1. Today, I bought kiwis. (^) → This must be true. Since I purchased blueberries today, it must be true that I also purchased kiwis.
  2. Bob’s fruit stand sells kiwis. (^) → This must be false. This conflicts with the first statement. Bob’s fruit stand does not sell kiwis.
  3. Bob’s fruit stand sells strawberries.

This could be true or false. No statement defines whether Bob’s fruit stand sells strawberries. The first statement says that Bob’s fruit stand sells blueberries (and not kiwis), but is silent on whether Bob’s fruit stand sells other fruit.

LSAT Reasoning

Perform

In the following exercise, you are given a set of premises and a set of statements that may or may not be valid deductions given those premises. Note whether each would-be deduction is true, false, or merely possible.

Premises and Possible Deductions My Analysis

(1) Duane’s Toys carries purple beach balls and green beach balls.

(2) The department store downtown carries only red beach balls.

(3) On any day Millie buys a beach ball, she always buys at least two, one for each of her nieces.

(4) Today, Millie bought a purple beach ball.

Determine the level of truth for each of the following statements: Must be true; could be true or false; or must be false

  1. Millie’s purple beach ball was purchased at Duane’s Toys. →
  2. Millie bought a green beach ball today.

  1. Today, Millie bought at least two beach balls. →
  2. If Millie purchased a beach ball at the downtown department store, then that beach ball was green. →
  3. If Millie purchased a red beach ball, then she bought it at the downtown department store. →
  4. Millie’s purple beach ball was purchased at the downtown department store. →

LSAT Reasoning

REFLECTION

In every section of the LSAT, the testmaker rewards you for being able to make valid deductions from the statements, assertions, or rules presented. As you review your practice throughout this course, consider the following questions:

  • What level of truth was the correct answer calling for?
  • Did you characterize the levels of truth in the one correct and four wrong answers before evaluating the answer choices? Were you distinguishing between what was true and what was correct?
  • Which statements, assertions, or rules in the question, game, or passage were strong enough to lead to valid deductions?
  • How did two or more statements, assertions, or rules combine to allow you to make valid deductions?

For the exercises you just completed, look back at your work and think about the following:

  • In which cases was it easier or harder to make deductions from the given statements?
  • In which questions could you make valid deductions from a single statement? Where did you have to combine statements to answer the question?
  • Thinking back to your Diagnostic Test, can you remember cases in which the testmaker rewarded you for making valid deductions in each section: Logic Games, Logical Reasoning, and Reading Comprehension?

CHAPTER 2

Identify Conditional Statements

Prepare

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

In this section, you’ll learn to:

· Identify what is and is not a conditional statement (that is, understand what it means for a statement to be a conditional statement)

Before you can work with conditional statements to make valid deductions and inferences (and answer LSAT questions), you must be able to identify such statements.

LSAT STRATEGY

Every conditional statement has two parts:

  1. A sufficient term , also known as the “trigger” or “if” term.
  2. A necessary term , also known as the “result/requirement” or “then” term.

Consider this conditional statement:

If you are in Australia, then you are south of the Equator.

Knowing that you are in Australia is sufficient to know that you are south of the Equator. Likewise, being south of the Equator is necessary to being in Australia. But be careful: Being in Australia is not necessary to being south of the Equator (after all, you might be in Madagascar or Argentina). Similarly, knowing that you are south of the Equator is not sufficient to know that you are in Australia.

Conditional relationships can be expressed in many ways other than the “If... then” sentence structure. Take a look at how an LSAT expert identifies conditional statements.

Premises Analysis

Is each of the following a conditional statement? The State of Pennsylvania requires a building permit for structures larger than 100 square feet.

Yes. Because a building permit is a requirement for structures larger than 100 square feet, it’s a necessary condition. Whenever Bill eats cereal, he also drinks coffee. →^

Yes. The word whenever indicates that Bill will drink coffee every time he eats cereal. Eating cereal is the trigger, or the sufficient condition. Patty stopped to smell the flowers. (^) → No. This is just an action that Patty performed. All of the jelly beans in this jar are either red or blue. →^

Yes. Because this concerns all of the jelly beans in the jar, we know that each jelly bean in the jar must be either red or blue.

Formal Logic

Practice

In the following exercise, read each statement and decide whether it expresses a conditional relationship. If it does, which term is sufficient and which is necessary?

Premises My Analysis

  1. Every person in this room is a doctor.

  1. The scientists should consider running another experiment.

  1. It’s impossible to turn on this computer unless it’s plugged in.

  1. I’m going to go to the family reunion only if my brother goes as well.

Formal Logic

Perform

In the following exercise, read each statement and decide whether it expresses a conditional relationship. If it does, which term is sufficient and which is necessary?

Premises My Analysis

  1. To stay healthy, you need to exercise at least twice a week.

  1. There are times when I think I’m going crazy.

  1. Only competitors with a signed medical waiver are eligible for the event.

  1. You can vote for chapter president only if your dues are paid.

CHAPTER 2

Expert Analysis

Here’s how an LSAT expert would analyze those statements.

Premises Analysis

  1. To stay healthy, you need to exercise at least twice a week. →

Yes. This could be written: If you are to stay healthy, then you must exercise at least twice a week. According to this statement, a person’s staying healthy is sufficient to establish that she exercises at least twice per week, and her exercising at least twice per week is necessary to her continued health.

  1. There are times when I think I’m going crazy. (^) → No. This is an assertion of fact. There is neither a sufficient nor a necessary term in this statement.
  2. Only competitors with a signed medical waiver are eligible for the event. →

Yes. This could be written: If a competitor is eligible for the event, then he has a signed medical waiver. A competitor’s eligibility is sufficient evidence that he has a signed medical waiver; a signed medical waiver is necessary for eligibility.

  1. You can vote for chapter president only if your dues are paid. →

Yes. This could be written: If you can vote for chapter president, then your dues are paid. Being able to vote is sufficient to know that your dues are paid. Having your dues paid is necessary to be able to vote.