Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Understanding Social Processes: Macro and Micro Perspectives in Sociology, Study notes of Sociology and Economics

An overview of the macro and micro perspectives in sociology, explaining how sociologists study the social world using different levels of analysis. The works of emile durkheim, who pioneered macrosociology, and george herbert mead, herbert blumer, and erving goffmann, who contributed to the development of microsociology. It also highlights the benefits and drawbacks of each approach and introduces key concepts such as symbolic interactionism and face-to-face interactions.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

laskhminaran
laskhminaran 🇺🇸

4.7

(6)

224 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Dr Arti Rani E-Content 22 Aug 2020
Semester-3
CC-10
Unit-1
Macro and Micro Perspectives in Sociology:
Just as scientists may study the natural world using different levels of analysis
(e.g., physical, chemical, or biological), sociologists study the social world using
different levels of analysis.
The macro-level study of widespread social processes has been the more dominant
approach, and has been practiced since sociology’s origins in the founding work of
figures like Emile Durkheim. Durkheim, for example, studied the large-scale shift
from homogenous traditional societies to industrialized societies, where each
individual played a highly specialized role. The tendency toward macrosociology
is evident in the kinds of questions that early sociologists asked: What holds
societies together? How are norms (and deviance) established and handled by
societies? What factors lead to social change, and what are the results of this
change? Macrosociologists focus on society as a whole, as something that is prior
to, and greater than, the sum of individual people.
Studying social life on the micro-level is a more recent development (in the early
and mid-twentieth century) in the history of the field, and was pioneered by
proponents of the symbolic interactionism perspective, namely George Herbert
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding Social Processes: Macro and Micro Perspectives in Sociology and more Study notes Sociology and Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Dr Arti Rani E-Content 22 Aug 2020 Semester- CC- Unit- Macro and Micro Perspectives in Sociology : Just as scientists may study the natural world using different levels of analysis (e.g., physical, chemical, or biological), sociologists study the social world using different levels of analysis. The macro-level study of widespread social processes has been the more dominant approach, and has been practiced since sociology’s origins in the founding work of figures like Emile Durkheim. Durkheim, for example, studied the large-scale shift from homogenous traditional societies to industrialized societies, where each individual played a highly specialized role. The tendency toward macrosociology is evident in the kinds of questions that early sociologists asked: What holds societies together? How are norms (and deviance) established and handled by societies? What factors lead to social change, and what are the results of this change? Macrosociologists focus on society as a whole, as something that is prior to, and greater than, the sum of individual people. Studying social life on the micro-level is a more recent development (in the early and mid-twentieth century) in the history of the field, and was pioneered by proponents of the symbolic interactionism perspective, namely George Herbert

Mead, Herbert Blumer, and Erving Goffmann. Mead was a pragmatist and behaviorist, which means several things.

  1. To pragmatists, true reality does not exist “out there” in the real world. It “is actively created as we act in and toward the world. “
  2. People remember and base their knowledge of the world on what has been useful to them, and are likely to alter what no longer “works. “
  3. People define the social and physical “objects” they encounter in the world according to their use for them.
  4. If we want to understand actors, we must base that understanding on what people actually do. Blumer built on Mead’s work. He believed that individuals create their own social reality through collective and individual action, and that the creation of social reality is a continuous process. Goffman elaborated on both Mead and Blumer by formulating the dramaturgical approach. He saw a connection between the acts people put on in their daily life and theatrical performances. In social interaction, like in theatrical performance, there is a front region where the “actors” (individuals) are on stage in front of the audience. This is where the positive aspect of the idea of self and desired impressions is highlighted. There is a back region, or stage, that can also be considered a hidden or private place where individuals can be themselves and step out of their role or identity in society. Face-to-face interactions are, thus, a stage where people perform roles and practice impression management (i.e. “saving face”). Other scholars have since developed new research questions and methods for studying micro-level social processes.

s