Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Arc Length Formula: Determining the Length of Curves using Riemann Integrals, Lecture notes of Calculus

How the Riemann integral can be used to find the lengths of certain curves through the concept of arc length. the subdivide and conquer strategy, the use of polygonal arcs as approximations, and the Mean Value Theorem. It also includes examples of calculating the arc length of specific functions.

What you will learn

  • How is the length of a curve approximated using polygonal arcs?
  • What is the role of the Mean Value Theorem in calculating the arc length of a curve?
  • How can the Riemann integral be used to find the length of a curve?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

skips
skips 🇺🇸

4.4

(11)

222 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Application: Arc Length
7.1The General Problem
The Riemann integral has a wide variety of applications. In this section, using the
‘subdivide and conquer’ strategy we will show how it can be used to determine
the lengths of certain curves.
EXAMPLE 7.1.Verizon is hanging fiber optic cable around Geneva. It wants to know
how much cable it will need. Since the cable must be hung with some slack (why?),
the engineers can’t simply measure the distance between the poles to know how much
cable to use.
Figure 7.1: A hanging chain forms a
catenary. http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Catenary
The curve that an idealized hanging chain or cable assumes when supported at its
ends and acted on only by its own weight is called a catenary. The equation for the
graph of a catenary curve is a hyperbolic cosine function
acosh x
a=a
2(ex/a+ex/a),
where ais a constant. How can Verizon use this equation to find the length of the
cable it needs?
Let’s try to attack this problem in a more general fashion. Suppose y=f(x)is
a continuous function on the closed interval [a,b]. Find the length of the graph of
y=f(x)on this interval. This length is called the arc length of the curve.
Think about how we approached the area problem. We used the only figures for
which we had an area formula (rectangles) and used those figures to approximate
the area under a curve. Well, the only curve whose length we are certain of is a
straight line segment.1If the segment has endpoints (x1,y1)and (x2,y2), then the 1You might protest that you know the
circumference of a circle: 2πr. But why
is that formula true?
length of the segment is given by the distance formula
Segment Length =q(x2x1)2+ (y2y1)2.
So somehow we must use line segments (the only curves we know how to mea-
sure) to obtain the length of a more general continuous curve.
Well, let’s do the usual thing: ‘subdivide and conquer.’ Suppose fis continuous
on [a,b]. Given a ruler, we might mark off successive points Q1,Q2, . . . , Qnalong
the curve and take the resulting polygonal arc as an approximation to the curve
(see Figure 7.2). We could measure the length of each segment of the polygonal arc
with our ruler (or the distance formula) and then summing these values together
we would have an approximation of the length of the curve. This idea (and the
lack of a precise definition of length for curves) motivates the following process.
Assume that fis continuous over the closed, bounded interval [a,b]. Let P=
{x0,x1, . . . , xn}be a regular partition of [a,b]into nequal width subintervals. For
i=1 to nlet Qi= (xi,f(xi)) be the corresponding set of points on the graph
of f. Then the polygonal arc from Q0to Qnis just the sequence of line segments
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Arc Length Formula: Determining the Length of Curves using Riemann Integrals and more Lecture notes Calculus in PDF only on Docsity!

Application: Arc Length

7. 1 The General Problem

The Riemann integral has a wide variety of applications. In this section, using the

‘subdivide and conquer’ strategy we will show how it can be used to determine

the lengths of certain curves.

EXAMPLE 7. 1. Verizon is hanging fiber optic cable around Geneva. It wants to know

how much cable it will need. Since the cable must be hung with some slack (why?),

the engineers can’t simply measure the distance between the poles to know how much

cable to use.

Figure 7. 1 : A hanging chain forms a

catenary. http://en.wikipedia.org/

wiki/Catenary

The curve that an idealized hanging chain or cable assumes when supported at its

ends and acted on only by its own weight is called a catenary. The equation for the

graph of a catenary curve is a hyperbolic cosine function

a cosh

x

a

a

(e

x/a

+ e

−x/a

where a is a constant. How can Verizon use this equation to find the length of the

cable it needs?

Let’s try to attack this problem in a more general fashion. Suppose y = f (x) is

a continuous function on the closed interval [a, b]. Find the length of the graph of

y = f (x) on this interval. This length is called the arc length of the curve.

Think about how we approached the area problem. We used the only figures for

which we had an area formula (rectangles) and used those figures to approximate

the area under a curve. Well, the only curve whose length we are certain of is a

straight line segment.

If the segment has endpoints (x

, y

) and (x

, y

), then the

You might protest that you know the

circumference of a circle: 2 π r. But why

is that formula true?

length of the segment is given by the distance formula

Segment Length =

(x

− x

+ (y

− y

So somehow we must use line segments (the only curves we know how to mea-

sure) to obtain the length of a more general continuous curve.

Well, let’s do the usual thing: ‘subdivide and conquer.’ Suppose f is continuous

on [a, b]. Given a ruler, we might mark off successive points Q

, Q

,... , Q

n

along

the curve and take the resulting polygonal arc as an approximation to the curve

(see Figure 7. 2 ). We could measure the length of each segment of the polygonal arc

with our ruler (or the distance formula) and then summing these values together

we would have an approximation of the length of the curve. This idea (and the

lack of a precise definition of length for curves) motivates the following process.

Assume that f is continuous over the closed, bounded interval [a, b]. Let P =

{x

, x

,... , x

n

} be a regular partition of [a, b] into n equal width subintervals. For

i = 1 to n let Q

i

= (x

i

, f (x

i

)) be the corresponding set of points on the graph

of f. Then the polygonal arc from Q

to Q

n

is just the sequence of line segments

x

= a x

x

i− 1

x

i

x

n

= b

∆x

f (x

i

) − f (x

i− 1

Q

Q

Q

i− 1

Q

i

Q

n

Figure 7. 2 : A curve y = f (x) and

a polygonal approximation using a

regular partition.

Q

Q

, Q

Q

,... , Q

n− 1

Q

n

. The length of this polygonal arc is just the sum of the

lengths of the individual segments. Using the Pythagorean theorem the length of

the ith segment is

Length(Segment i) =

(x

i

− x

i− 1

)

  • [ f (x

i

) − f (x

i− 1

)]

. ( 7. 1 )

We can simplify ( 7. 1 ) in two ways. As usual, we let ∆x = x

i

− x

i− 1

. Next, by the

Mean Value Theorem (yet once again!), if we assume that f is also differentiable on

[a, b], then

f (x

i

) − f (x

i− 1

)

x

i

− x

i− 1

= f

(c

i

)

for some point c

i

between x

i− 1

and x

i

. Consequently,

f (x

i

) − f (x

i− 1

) = f

(c

i

) · [x

i

− x

i− 1

] = f

(c

i

)∆x.

Making both of these changes to ( 7. 1 ) we get

Length(Segment i) =

(∆x)

  • [ f

(c

i

)∆x]

. =

1 + [ f

(c

i

)]

∆x. ( 7. 2 )

Adding the lengths of all n line segments together we have

Length of Curve ≈

n

i= 1

Length(Segment i) =

n

i= 1

1 + [ f

(c

i

)]

· ∆x.

Notice that we now have a Riemann sum! To improve the approximation we do

the standard thing: We let the number of polygonal pieces get large and take the

limit. We find

Length of Curve = lim

n→∞

n

i= 1

1 + [ f

(c

i

)]

· ∆x =

b

a

1 + [ f

(x)]

dx.

To be certain that this limit of the Riemann sums is, in fact, the definite integral we

need to know that

1 + ( f

(x))

is continuous. It will be, if we assume that f

(x) is continuous. With these condi-

tions, we find

THEOREM 7. 1 ( Arc Length Formula ). If f is differentiable and f

is continuous on the closed

interval [a, b], then the arc length of f on [a, b] is

Arc Length of f =

b

a

1 + [ f

(x)]

dx.

EXAMPLE 7. 2. Find the arc length of f over [2, 6] for f (x) =

x

by 12 , so

Circumfrence of Circle = 12

r/

x

r

− x

dx

r/

(r

− x

) + x

r

− x

dx

r/

r

r

− x

dx

r/

r

r

− x

dx

= 12 r arcsin

x

r

r/

= 12 r

[

arcsin

− arcsin( 0 )

]

= 12 r

= 2 π r.

Awesome! We have now proven that the circumference of a circle of radius r is 2 π r.

Earlier we showed that the volume of a sphere of radius r is

π r

. Interestingly, we

have not yet shown that the area of a circle of radius r is π r

. The reason for this is

that to determine the area we need to calculate

r

−r

r

− x

dx

but we do not yet know an antiderivative of

r

− x

. (Look it up in a table! Find the

area of a circle using this.)

EXAMPLE 7. 5 (Length of a Line Segment). Our arc length formula better work for the

length of an ordinary line segment. Let’s check. Find the length of the segment be-

tween (3, 4) and (8, − 6 ).

SOLUTION. Since the segment is part of a non-vertical line, its equation has the form

y = f (x) = mx + b, so f

(x) = m. The slope of the segment is

m =

Using Theorem 7. 1 we find

Arc Length of Segment =

b

a

1 + [ f

(x)]

dx = 12

dx

5 dx

5 x

Using the distance formula, the length of the segment is

which is the same answer we got using the arc length formula. Phew!

EXAMPLE 7. 6 (Simplifying). Let f (x) =

x

x

on [1, 2]. Find the arc length.

SOLUTION. Ok, time to ’fess up. There are not many arc length integrals we can do.

This is one of them, but it requires some algebraic manipulation. Once you see this

you should recognize similar integrals.

The derivative is

f

(x) =

x

x

Notice that the exponents are negatives of each other. This is important because when

we square f

(x),

[ f

(x)]

x

x

x

x

We get a constant of −

for the middle term. Consequently, when we add one to this,

we get

for the middle term,

1 + [ f

(x)]

x

x

x

x

x

x

which is again a perfect square. Now we are ready to calculate the arc length using

Theorem 7. 1 we find

Arc Length =

b

a

1 + [ f

(x)]

dx =

x

x

dx

x

x

dx

x

x

Messy, but doable! (Notice the similarity between the original function f and the

antiderivative of

1 + [ f

(x)]

which is characteristic of this type of problem.)

It’s a sad fact, arc lengths involve complicated integrands so without additional

integration methods (coming soon!) there are not many arc lengths that we can

compute. Here are a few more we’d like to do.

EXAMPLE 7. 7. What about the arc length of a parabola, say f (x) = x

on [0, 1]. Check

that

Arc Length =

1 + 4 x

dx,

but we do not yet have an antiderivative for this problem. Similarly If g(x) = sin x on

[0, π ], then

Arc Length =

1 + cos

x dx.

Or if f (x) = e

x

on [0, 1], then

Arc Length =

1 + e

2 x

dx.

If you know how to use Wolfram Alpha, you might try these problems. But for the

moment, we are stuck!

YOU TRY IT 7. 1. Find the arc lengths of the following functions over the given intervals.

(a) f (x) =

x

on [0, 8]. (Answer:

(b) f (x) =

x

8 x

on [1, 2]. (Answer:

(c) g(x) = x

12 x

on [1, 3]. (Answer:

(d) h(x) = cosh x on [0, ln 2]. Remember, cosh x =

e

x

e

−x

. (Answer: