Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Mathcad - Li-1s3.mcd, Lecture notes of Mathematics

We now calculate the ground-state energy of lithium assuming it has the 1s22s1 electronic configuration. The total electronic energy consists of nine ...

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

thehurts
thehurts 🇺🇸

4.5

(11)

219 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Why Isn't the Ground State Electronic Structure of the Lithium Atom 1s3?
The purpose of this tutorial is to point out that if all that mattered in the determination of atomic structure was
energy minimization, the electronic structure of lithium would be 1s3, rather than 1s22s1.
To deal with this issue we choose the following scaled hydrogenic orbitals for the lithium atom's electrons:
Ψ1s α3
πexp α r
()
=Ψ2s α3
32 π 2αr
()
exp α r
2
=
Using this basis set we find the following expressions (in terms of the variational parameter α) for the
expectation values for the various contributions to the electronic energy of the lithium atom.
Nuclear charge: Z3:=
Kinetic energy integrals: T1s α
()
α2
2
:= T2s α
()
α2
8
:=
VN1s α
()
Z−α:= VN2s α
()
Z
4
−α:=
Electron-nucleus potential energy integrals:
Electron-electron potential energy integrals: V1s1s α
()
5
8α:= V1s2s α
()
17
81 α:=
We now calculate the ground-state energy of lithium assuming it has the 1s22s1 electronic configuration. The
total electronic energy consists of nine contributions: three kinetic energy terms, three electron-nucleus
potential energy terms, and three electron-electron potential energy contriubtions.
ELi α
()
2T
1s α
()
2V
N1s α
()
+ V1s1s α
()
+T2s α
()
+VN2s α
()
+2V
1s2s α
()
+:=
Minimization of the energy with respect to the variational parameter, α, yields the following result:
ααELi α
()
d
d0=solve α,
float 4,2.536:= ELi α
()
7.2333=
Compared to the experimental ground-state energy -7.478 Eh (the negative of the successive ionization
energies of the lithium atom) this result is in error by 3.3%. This result is satisfactory, indicating that the
theoretical model has some merit. We could do better, of course, but it would cost something in terms of
computational effort and simplicity of the model.
Now we calculate the energy of the hypothetical 1s3 electronic configuration for lithium using the same basis
functions. Again, the total electronic energy consists of nine contributions: three kinetic energy terms,
three electron-nucleus potential energy terms, and three electron-electron potential energy
contriubtions.
ELi α
()
3T
1s α
()
3V
N1s α
()
+ 3V
1s1s α
()
+:=
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Mathcad - Li-1s3.mcd and more Lecture notes Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Why Isn't the Ground State Electronic Structure of the Lithium Atom 1s

The purpose of this tutorial is to point out that if all that mattered in the determination of atomic structure was

energy minimization, the electronic structure of lithium would be 1s

3 , rather than 1s

2 2s

1 .

To deal with this issue we choose the following scaled hydrogenic orbitals for the lithium atom's electrons:

1s

α

3

π

= ⋅exp (−^ α ⋅r) Ψ

2s

α

3

32 ⋅ π

⋅ (^2 −α ⋅r)exp

−α ⋅r

Using this basis set we find the following expressions (in terms of the variational parameter α) for the

expectation values for the various contributions to the electronic energy of the lithium atom.

Nuclear charge: (^) Z := 3

Kinetic energy integrals: (^) T 1s

α

2

:= T

2s

α

2

V

N1s

( α) := −Z ⋅α V

N2s

Z

:= − ⋅α Electron-nucleus potential energy integrals:

Electron-electron potential energy integrals: (^) V 1s1s

:= ⋅α V 1s2s

:= ⋅α

We now calculate the ground-state energy of lithium assuming it has the 1s

2 2s

1 electronic configuration. The

total electronic energy consists of nine contributions: three kinetic energy terms, three electron-nucleus

potential energy terms, and three electron-electron potential energy contriubtions.

E

Li

( α) 2 T

1s

⋅ (α^ ) 2 V

N1s

+ ⋅ (^ α) V

1s1s

+ (α^ ) T

2s

+ (α^ ) V

N2s

+ (^ α) 2 V

1s2s

:= + ⋅ (α^ )

Minimization of the energy with respect to the variational parameter, α, yields the following result:

α

α

E

Li

d

d

solve ,α

float 4,

:= →2.536 E

Li

Compared to the experimental ground-state energy -7.478 E h

(the negative of the successive ionization

energies of the lithium atom) this result is in error by 3.3%. This result is satisfactory, indicating that the

theoretical model has some merit. We could do better, of course, but it would cost something in terms of

computational effort and simplicity of the model.

Now we calculate the energy of the hypothetical 1s

3 electronic configuration for lithium using the same basis

functions. Again, t he total electronic energy consists of nine contributions: three kinetic energy terms,

three electron-nucleus potential energy terms, and three electron-electron potential energy

contriubtions.

E

Li

( α) 3 T

1s

⋅ (α^ ) 3 V

N1s

+ ⋅ (^ α) 3 V

1s1s

:= + ⋅ (α^ )

Minimization of the energy with respect to the variational parameter, α, yields the following result:

First reset the value of α: α := α α

α

E

Li

d

d

solve ,α

float 4,

:= →2.375 E

Li

This electronic configuration has a lower energy than that for 1s

2 2s

1 , and also lower than the experimental

value in clear violation of the variational principle.

Electrons are fermions and subject to the Pauli exclusion principle which prevents two electrons from having

the same set of quantum numbers. Thus, while the 1s

3 electronic configuration has a lower energy its

existence is prevented by the Pauli principle.