

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
We now calculate the ground-state energy of lithium assuming it has the 1s22s1 electronic configuration. The total electronic energy consists of nine ...
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
The purpose of this tutorial is to point out that if all that mattered in the determination of atomic structure was
energy minimization, the electronic structure of lithium would be 1s
3 , rather than 1s
2 2s
1 .
To deal with this issue we choose the following scaled hydrogenic orbitals for the lithium atom's electrons:
1s
α
3
π
2s
α
3
32 ⋅ π
−α ⋅r
Using this basis set we find the following expressions (in terms of the variational parameter α) for the
expectation values for the various contributions to the electronic energy of the lithium atom.
Nuclear charge: (^) Z := 3
Kinetic energy integrals: (^) T 1s
α
2
2s
α
2
N1s
N2s
:= − ⋅α Electron-nucleus potential energy integrals:
Electron-electron potential energy integrals: (^) V 1s1s
:= ⋅α V 1s2s
:= ⋅α
We now calculate the ground-state energy of lithium assuming it has the 1s
2 2s
1 electronic configuration. The
total electronic energy consists of nine contributions: three kinetic energy terms, three electron-nucleus
potential energy terms, and three electron-electron potential energy contriubtions.
Li
1s
N1s
1s1s
2s
N2s
1s2s
Minimization of the energy with respect to the variational parameter, α, yields the following result:
α
α
Li
d
d
solve ,α
float 4,
Li
Compared to the experimental ground-state energy -7.478 E h
(the negative of the successive ionization
energies of the lithium atom) this result is in error by 3.3%. This result is satisfactory, indicating that the
theoretical model has some merit. We could do better, of course, but it would cost something in terms of
computational effort and simplicity of the model.
Now we calculate the energy of the hypothetical 1s
3 electronic configuration for lithium using the same basis
Li
1s
N1s
1s1s
Minimization of the energy with respect to the variational parameter, α, yields the following result:
First reset the value of α: α := α α
α
Li
d
d
solve ,α
float 4,
Li
This electronic configuration has a lower energy than that for 1s
2 2s
1 , and also lower than the experimental
value in clear violation of the variational principle.
Electrons are fermions and subject to the Pauli exclusion principle which prevents two electrons from having
the same set of quantum numbers. Thus, while the 1s
3 electronic configuration has a lower energy its
existence is prevented by the Pauli principle.