Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Method to Determine Index of Refraction of Ocean Particles: Zaneveld and Pak, Study notes of Oceanography

A method for calculating the index of refraction of suspended particles in the ocean using the particle-size distribution and inherent optical properties. The authors show that the significant index of refraction can be determined with sufficient accuracy to become an important parameter in ocean studies.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

eknath
eknath 🇺🇸

4.7

(29)

266 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Method for the determination of the index of refraction of particles
suspended in the ocean*
J. Ronald V. Zaneveld and Hasong Pak
Department of Oceanography, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
(Received 18 May 1972)
It is shown that the complex index of refraction of a given particle-size distribution may be calculated if
the particle extinction coefficient and the particle absorption coefficient are known. If the particles are
assumed to be nonabsorbing, a real index of refraction may be calculated from the ratio of light scattering
at 45' from the forward for two wavelengths. Application of the method to two stations off Ecuador
indicates that the particle index of refraction can be determined with sufficient accuracy to become an
important parameter in the study of the oceans.
Index Headings: Oceanography; Refractive index; Scattering.
The index of refraction of suspended particles in the
ocean is a most interesting but elusive parameter. The
index of refraction of suspended particles has not been
measured directly. Nevertheless, many calculations of
volume scattering functions using the Mie theory have
been carried out using estimated indices of refraction.
The index of refraction can also be a useful oceanic
parameter describing the origin of particles. Pavlov and
Grechushnikovl have estimated that the relative index
of refraction of minerals in the sea is 1.17, whereas the
relative index of refraction of living matter in the sea is
probably closer to unity. Pak et al.A have characterized
the suspensoids in the ocean by means of "light-
scattering vectors." These vectors use the average size of
a suspended particle in a sample and the average
scattering at 45°. The method could probably be im-
proved by using the particulate index of refraction
rather than the average scattering.
The only method currently available for the calcula-
tion of a weighted average index of refraction is that of
Gordon and Brown.
3 Using the theory developed by
Mie
4 to calculate a number of volume scattering func-
tions, they found the closest fit to experimental data.
The corresponding index of refraction is that of the
scattering sample.
This method, although accurate, is not deterministic.
In this paper, a theory will be developed that will give
an index of refraction directly from the particle-size
distribution and the inherent optical properties (light
attenuation and scattering).
Caution must be exercised when the term index of
refraction is used for a collection of particles. The
average index of refraction such as determined by
Gordon and Brown
3 and by ourselves is really the value
of the index of refraction that reproduces the bulk
scattering properties of the particles. The individual
indices of refraction are weighted by the scattering
cross sections of the particles and then averaged. This
process tends to favor the larger particles, as the
scattering cross section is related to the cross-sectional
area of the particles. In order to distinguish it from a
true average index of refraction, the term significant
index of refraction will be applied to the value of the
index of refraction that will reproduce the bulk optical
properties of the particle distribution.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
The ocean will be considered to be a collection of
spherical particles suspended in pure water. The index
of refraction of water (real) will be given by mr, and the
(complex) significant index of refraction of the particles
will be given
by mr,= n,-inj', following
Van de
Hulst's
5
notation.
The particles will further be characterized by a
particle-size distribution f(D)dD, giving the number of
particles with diameters between D and D+dD. Mie4
theory permits us to calculate extinction, scattering, and
absorption cross sections for suspended spherical parti-
cles if the indices of refraction of the particles and the
suspending medium are known. The expressions for the
cross sections may be greatly simplified if the index of
refraction of the particles is close to that of the sus-
pending medium
IlM-ll<l,
where n =m /mrn.
This implies
both I n/mn- 13(<1 and
n,'/mn<<«l.
In
the ocean, the assumption rm-1i<<1 is reasonable.
Van de Hulst5 has derived approximate formulas for the
extinction (Qert) and absorption efficiencies (Qabs) de-
rived from Mie theory for the case rm-1j<<1. The
efficiencies are obtained by dividing the cross sections
for the extinction or absorption by the geometrical
cross section of the particle. Burt' has presented a useful
scattering diagram that shows the efficiency
factor as a
function of size, wavelength, and relative refractive
index. The relations are
cost
Qext= 2 -4e-p tanft sinf(p-
p
fcosf3\ 2 /cos/3 2
-4eP tan\ c ) cos(p-21)+4 -) cos2i3
(1)
321
VOLUMNE 63, NUMBER 3MARCH 1973
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Method to Determine Index of Refraction of Ocean Particles: Zaneveld and Pak and more Study notes Oceanography in PDF only on Docsity!

JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA

Method for the determination of the index of refraction of particles

suspended in the ocean*

J. Ronald V. Zaneveld and Hasong Pak Department of Oceanography, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 (Received 18 May 1972)

It is shown that the complex index of refraction of a given particle-size distribution may be calculated if the particle extinction coefficient and the particle absorption coefficient are known. If the particles are assumed to be nonabsorbing, a real index of refraction may be calculated from the ratio of light scattering at 45' from the forward for two wavelengths. Application of the method to two stations off Ecuador indicates that the particle index of refraction can be determined with sufficient accuracy to become an important parameter in the study of the oceans.

Index Headings: Oceanography; Refractive index; Scattering.

The index of refraction of suspended particles in the ocean is a most interesting but elusive parameter. The index of refraction of suspended particles has not been measured directly. Nevertheless, many calculations of volume scattering functions using the Mie theory have been carried out using estimated indices of refraction. The index of refraction can also be a useful oceanic parameter describing the origin of particles. Pavlov and Grechushnikovl have estimated that the relative index of refraction of minerals in the sea is 1.17, whereas the relative index of refraction of living matter in the sea is probably closer to unity. Pak et al.A have characterized the suspensoids in the ocean by means of "light- scattering vectors." These vectors use the average size of a suspended particle in a sample and the average scattering at 45°. The method could probably be im- proved by using the particulate index of refraction rather than the average scattering. The only method currently available for the calcula- tion of a weighted average index of refraction is that of Gordon and Brown.^3 Using the theory developed by Mie^4 to calculate a number of volume scattering func- tions, they found the closest fit to experimental data. The corresponding index of refraction is that of the scattering sample. This method, although accurate, is not deterministic. In this paper, a theory will be developed that will give an index of refraction (^) directly from the particle-size distribution and the inherent (^) optical properties (light attenuation and scattering). Caution must be exercised when the term index of refraction is used for a collection of particles. The average index of refraction such as determined by Gordon and Brown^3 and by ourselves is really the value of the index of refraction that reproduces the bulk scattering properties of the particles. The individual indices of refraction are weighted by the scattering cross sections of the particles and then averaged. This process tends to favor the larger particles, as the scattering cross section is related to the cross-sectional area of the particles. In order to distinguish it from a true average index of refraction, the term significant

index of refraction will be applied to the value of the index of refraction that will reproduce the bulk optical properties of the particle distribution.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

The ocean will be considered to be a collection of spherical particles suspended in pure water. The index of refraction of water (real) will be given by mr, and the (complex) significant index of refraction of the particles

willbe givenby mr,= n,-inj', followingVan de Hulst's^5

notation. The particles will further be characterized by a particle-size distribution f(D)dD, giving the number of particles with diameters between D and D+dD. (^) Mie^4 theory permits us to calculate extinction, scattering, and absorption cross sections for suspended spherical parti- cles if the indices of refraction of the particles and the suspending medium are known. The expressions for the cross sections may be greatly simplified if the index of refraction of the particles is close to that of the sus- pending medium IlM-ll<l,

where n =m /mrn.

Thisimpliesboth I n/mn- 13(<1and n,'/mn<<«l. In the ocean, the assumption rm-1i<<1 is reasonable. Van de Hulst^5 has derived approximate formulas for the extinction (Qert) and absorption efficiencies (Qabs) de- rived from Mie theory for the case rm-1j<<1. The efficiencies are obtained by dividing the cross sections for the extinction or absorption by the geometrical cross section of the particle. Burt' has presented a useful scattering diagram that shows the efficiencyfactor as a function of size, wavelength, and relative refractive index. The relations are

cost

Qext= 2 -4e-p tanft sinf(p-

p

fcosf3\ 2 /cos/3 2

-4eP *tan* c ) cos(p-21)+4 -) cos2i3 (1)

321

VOLUMNE63, NUMBER (^3) MARCH 1973

J. R. V. ZANEVELD AND H. PAK

and

where

e- 2 p tang e- 2 p tana. - 1 Qabs2l± (^) + - p tank3^2 (p tan,3)^2

27rD np

P=- 1 ,

X mt

but X is the wavelength of light in the medium so that X=Xvae/mw. (^) Hence 2irD p = Inp-mw. Xvac For convenience the factor 27r

k=-Inp-mtO|

Xvac is introduced, so that p = kD. Furthermore,

tankl= np'/(n p-mw).

By integrating the extinction cross section over the particle-size distribution, we obtain the total extinction coefficient for particles (cp) in the medium r0 (^) XrD 2

cp= f f(D)Qext(kD,3)- dD. (3)

Jo 4 Similarly, the total absorption coefficientfor particles (ap) is given by X xrD^2

ap= f f(D)Qnb.(kDfl)- dD. (4)

Jo (^4) If the particle-size distribution is known, Eqs. (3) and (4) permit us, in principle, to solve for k and /3, and hence np and (^) np'.

THE TWO-PARAMETER (^) PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION

The integrations indicated by Eqs. (3) and (4) may be performed numerically or analytically using any mea- sured or assumed particle-size distribution. One form of the particle-size distribution that lends itself readily to analytical integration is the exponential distribution with two parameters A and N,

f (D) dD=NA e-AD dD. (5)

This form of the distribution permits the cumulative particle-size distribution g(D) to be written as

g(D) = NAe-AD'dD=Ne-AD. (6)

The cumulative particle-size distribution (^) (the number of particles per unit volume with diameters larger than D) is the distribution (^) usually measured.. Almost all samples obtained in the eastern Pacific during the Yaloc 1969 and Yaloc 1971 cruises of Oregon State University 7

can be fitted within experimental error by a distribution like that in Eq. (6). For the remainder of this paper, we will employ the distributions of Eqs. (5) and (^) (6), although similar calculations may be performed (^) using different size distributions. Substitution of Eqs. (5) and (1) into Eq. (3) results in rX (^) 7r 2 Cos# cp = NAe-AD- 2-4e-kD tang -sin(kD-0) 4 kD cos3\ 2

-4e-kD tanfl ) cos(kD-2,3)

coso 2 +4 4 )cos23 (^) dD. (7)

\kD/)

Equation (^) (7) may be integrated to express the particulate (^) extinction coefficient entirely in terms of N, A, k, and,3, (^1) A+k tank Cp=NAmr -- 2 cos^2 2 L4^3 (A+k tan3)^2 +k2 2

sin2f3 [(A +k tano)^2 -k 2 ]

2k E(A+k tanf3)^2 +k 2 1J^2

cosB 2 A+k tank

  • cos2f k (A+k (^) tanf3)^2 +k^2 sin2o 1 /Cos3\ 2 cos2/ -cost3 + (^) i. (8) k (A+k tanf3)2+k^2 k AJ Substitution of Eqs. (5) and (2) into Eq. (4) results in 1* 7eD2 - e-2k:D tang

ap= f Ae-AD [ 1+

J 0 j 4 - kD tank

or

e-2kD tan# - I

+ dD

2(kD tan/3) 2 '

Nrr (^1) 1 1

ap= --

2LA 2 (A+2k (^) tan0) 2 -

(9)

(10)

Equations (7) and (9) overestimate the contribution of particles for which (^) 7rD/X>>l is not satisfied. By use of Eqs. (1) and (2) rather than the exact expressions for the extinction (^) and absorption coefficients of small particles, an error of not more than 2% is introduced. Equation (^) (10) expresses 27r

k tan# =-np'

as a function of ax, N, and A. Once n,' (^) is calculated from Eq. (10), np may be obtained (^) from Eq. (8). Equation (8) is a quartic equation in (nx,-m )^2 and may be solved directly. A graphical solution may be obtained by plotting 27r k=-I np-m, 01 X

(^322) Vol. 63

J. R.^ V.^ ZANEVELD^ AND^ H.^ PAK

where

2ir 27r kI=-In,-mwI and k 2 =-Inp-n,,,. X 2

Equation (12) may be solved for Inp- I1 as a

function of 3 45 (X1)/,3 45 (X 2 ) and A if X 1 /X2 is given. Such a solution is shown in Fig. 2 for the case X 1 =436 nm and X2= 546 nm. In order to provide some insight into actual measurements, results from two stations 210 km apart in the trench off Ecuador have been plotted in Fig. 2. The significant real indices of refraction thus obtained are replotted as a function of depth in Fig. 3. Figure 3 shows that in the simplified case np'=O, the depth de- pendence of the index of refraction of the suspended particles is roughly similar for the two stations.

CONCLUSIONS The significant complex index of refraction for a known particle-size distribution can be obtained by use of Van de Hulst's^5 approximation for the extinction and absorption efficiencies. Accurate determination of the significant index of refraction is possible if both the particle extinction coefficient and particle absorption coefficient are known. In practice, these are currently difficult to measure. If the particles are assumed to be nonabsorbing, a significant (real) index of refraction can be calculated from the ratio of light scattering at 450 for two different

wavelengths. Application of this method to samples taken off Ecuador indicates that the significant index of refraction can currently be determined with sufficient accuracy to become an important parameter in the study of the oceans. The difference between the water index of refraction and the significant real index of refraction j -mW| I for these samples lies in the range 0.01-0.05. REFERENCES *Research supported by the Office of Naval Research through contract No. NOOO 14-67-A-0369-0007 under project No. NR 083-102. ' V. M. Pavlov and B. N. Grechushnikov, Some Aspects of the Theory of DaylightPolarizationIndices, U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Joint Publication Research Session, Report No. 36 (U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1966), p.25. (^2) H. Pak, G. F. Beardsley, Jr., G. R. Heath, and H. Curl,

3 Limnol. Oceanogr.^ 15,^ 683 (1970). H. R. Gordon and 0. B. Brown, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 4 52,^ 245 (1971). 5 G.^ Mie, Ann. Phys. (Leipz.)^ 25,^ 377 (1908). H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles 6^ (Wiley, New York, 1957), pp.^ 172-199. W. V. Burt, J. Mar. Res. 15, 76 (1956). 'K. L. Carder, Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis 8 (1970). N. G. Jerlov, Report of the Swedish Deep-SeaExpedition, 1947-48, Vol. 3 (Elanders Boktryckeri 9 Aktiebolag,^ Goteborg,^ 1953), pp. 73-97. G. D. Deirmendjian, in ElectromagneticScattering, edited by M. Kerker (Macmillan, New York, 1963), p. 171. '^0 G. F. Beardsley, Jr., H. Pak, K. L. Carder, and B. Lundgren, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 2837 (1970).

324 Vol. 63