Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

MGMT 211 praxt exam 1 | MGMT - Business Policy, Quizzes of Business Policy and Regulation

Class: MGMT - Business Policy; Subject: Management; University: Merced College; Term: Forever 1989;

Typology: Quizzes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 09/24/2012

craig1adds
craig1adds 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
TERM 1
Marbury v.
Madison
DEFINITION 1
Supreme court gave rights of judical review to declare
actions by the pres. or congress unconstitutional.
TERM 2
Texas VS. Johnson
DEFINITION 2
Protester of rep. party and regan burned flag in dallas in
violation of TX law.Stute found to be unconstitional as too
restrictive on freedom of speech in response federal law later
declared uncons. on same basis
TERM 3
US v. Eichman
DEFINITION 3
Fed. Flag burning law put in effect after tx v johnson
caseFond the federal flag protection act as illegal on same
bases
TERM 4
new state ice company v
lieberman
DEFINITION 4
state law become lab. stting for potentional fed system
without risking rest of country
TERM 5
imm. and nat service v
chadda
DEFINITION 5
fond the legislative veto portion of an act created by
congress as uncons.act declared cons. as it is somewaht
violated in the separation of powers with non approval of
veto
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download MGMT 211 praxt exam 1 | MGMT - Business Policy and more Quizzes Business Policy and Regulation in PDF only on Docsity!

Marbury v.

Madison

Supreme court gave rights of judical review to declare actions by the pres. or congress unconstitutional. TERM 2

Texas VS. Johnson

DEFINITION 2 Protester of rep. party and regan burned flag in dallas in violation of TX law.Stute found to be unconstitional as too restrictive on freedom of speech in response federal law later declared uncons. on same basis TERM 3

US v. Eichman

DEFINITION 3 Fed. Flag burning law put in effect after tx v johnson caseFond the federal flag protection act as illegal on same bases TERM 4

new state ice company v

lieberman

DEFINITION 4 state law become lab. stting for potentional fed system without risking rest of country TERM 5

imm. and nat service v

chadda

DEFINITION 5 fond the legislative veto portion of an act created by congress as uncons.act declared cons. as it is somewaht violated in the separation of powers with non approval of veto

youngstown sheet and tube v

sawyer

during korean war dispute at plant over collective bargaining agreement. president intervened illegallyseizure of mill illegal by president as not within scope of const. powers attempt by exac. branch to make laws TERM 7

gibbons v

ogden

DEFINITION 7 NY tried to have monopolisitic rights on good travelling between ny and nj with only state licensedetermine diff of interstate and intrastate giving nat. govt power over interstate that concerns itself with more then one state TERM 8

NLRB v jones and

laughlin

DEFINITION 8 labor disputes at steel mill. work stoppage occureed congress wanted to intervenegave congress the right to determine if serious effect on commerce and if it is substancial TERM 9

Mcullough v

maryland

DEFINITION 9 maryland wanted to tax a branch of the nat bank in its state, denied by couta states attempt to tax nat. govmt violated both the necessary and proper clause as well as supremacy clause TERM 10

plessy v

furguson

DEFINITION 10 as long as races were treate equal it was cons. to seperate races