






















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An analysis of pfizer's monopoly on atorvastatin (lipitor) and the impact of generic drugs on the market. It discusses the hatch-waxman act, pricing strategies, and market power sources. It also includes questions for managerial economics students.
Typology: Slides
1 / 30
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Pfizer markets atorvastatin under the brand name “Lipitor”. In 2010, Lipitor was Pfizer’s best-selling drug. Even while protected by patent, Lipitor faced competition from other statins- particularly simvastatin. The US patent on simvastatin, owned by Merck, expired in 2006, and Merck cut the price of Zocor, its branded simvastatin. Pfizer’s US patent on atorvastatin expired in June 2011.
Pfizer must decide how to manage the competition. How much should it spend on advertising? At what scale should Pfizer produce the branded drug? How would generic production of atorvastatin affect the market for the ingredients in the production of the drug?
Medical clinic
Hospital anti-virus software, microcomputer operating system
unique resources human natural intellectual property patent Copyright economies of scale / scope product differentiation government regulation
infra-marginal units
Operate at scale where marginal revenue = marginal cost Justification: If marginal revenue > marginal cost, sell more and increase profit. If marginal revenue < marginal cost, sell less and increase profit.
Find new scale where marginal revenue = marginal cost should change price new scale and price depend on both new demand and costs
Find new scale where marginal revenue = marginal cost change in MC --> should change price (but less than change in MC) change in fixed cost --> should not change price or scale
benefit of advertising -- increment in contribution margin advertising elasticity = % increase in demand from 1% increase in advertising
Profit-maximizing advertising/sales = incremental margin x advertising elasticity
Coke raised prices by 7% increased advertising and other marketing Pepsi raised price by 6.9% what about advertising?
Pepsi should increase advertising expenditure for two reasons: price increase --> increase in incremental margin; Pepsi’s increase in advertising will attract some marginal consumers -- those who are brand- switchers, relatively less loyal to Pepsi/Coke; so Coke’s demand will be more sensitive to advertising (higher advertising elasticity)