NEA05582
Student reflections on the effectiveness of ICT as a learning resource
AUTHOR: Greg Neal (Victoria University)
Paper prepared for presentation at the AARE Annual Conference Parramatta
Nov/Dec 2005
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Guidelines and tips
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
University Rankings
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Our save-the-student-ebooks!
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Student Views on ICT as a Learning Tool: Voice and Personalized Learning, Study notes of Voice
The effectiveness of ICT as a learning resource from the perspective of students. The author emphasizes the importance of personalized learning and identifies 'student voice' and the use of new technologies as two key gateways to achieving this goal. The document also discusses the benefits of ICT for students, such as increased autonomy, active learning, and deeper cognitive opportunities. However, it also highlights the challenges of implementing ICT in the classroom, including the need to consider school structures, access to technology, and the continuity of skills and knowledge across curriculum domains.
Typology: Study notes
2021/2022
1 / 23
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Related documents
Partial preview of the text
Download Student Views on ICT as a Learning Tool: Voice and Personalized Learning and more Study notes Voice in PDF only on Docsity!
NEA
Student reflections on the effectiveness of ICT as a learning resource
AUTHOR: Greg Neal (Victoria University)
Paper prepared for presentation at the AARE Annual Conference Parramatta Nov/Dec 2005
Student reflections on the effectiveness of ICT as a learning resource
Abstract Direct investigations of student opinions about the use of ICT and learning are generally missing from the literature. This paper reports on a study that captured the reflective voice of students to investigate what is truly happening in Victorian schools. The focus of this study was the student learner and how students think about their own learning. The study identified key contextual factors that influence the learning process and, in conjunction with ICT, change the learning opportunities for students. The analytical framework in this paper captures the relationship between the substantive factors including the learning culture, social well-being, motivation and engagement, and thinking and learning strategies.
Background
A key role of education is to empower students with skills and attitudes that are essential to their success in our knowledge society future. Cuttance (2001) suggests that new ways of thinking and solving problems in supportive classroom learning environments require well-developed motivation, self-regulation strategies and metacognitive capacities to engage students successfully.
A central aim is to ensure students, such as those in the middle-years, acquire essential information skills (Barratt, 1998) appropriate to the knowledge society, and to nurture modes of learning, or learning styles, such as visual, auditory and kinesthetic (Hinkley, 2001) to maximize the learning potential of individual students. This means that a new challenge confronting education is concerned with meeting the needs of all students: personalised learning where learning is designed around students needs (Hargreaves, 2004).
Hargreaves (2004) highlights the importance of ‘nine gateways’ to personalising learningʊcurriculum, workforce, organisation, student voice, mentoring, advice and guidance, new technologies (ICT), assessment for learning and learning to learn, with each potentially “enhancing student motivation and commitment to learning” (p 7). This paper is concerned with two of the aforementioned gateways to personalising learning: student voice the use of new technologies (ICT).
It would be meaningless to say we are personalising learning unless we involve them [students] in the process” (Hargreaves, 2004:10). Practices that focus on designing curriculum experiences have been encouraged as central features of reform initiatives to improve the quality of learning in schools. The use of student voice benefits teachers and therefore possible changes to teaching practice and curriculum experiences.
In this context, this paper considers student voice from middle-years students (early adolescents), Years 5 to 9, from Victorian Government schools. The voice of students is able to make a significant contribution to what they regard are important factors, particularly with the use of ICT, that affect learning. Furthermore, the need to consider personalised learning adds to the importance of identifying with students in an effort to improve student performance.
are necessary to create and sustain the environment in which “the strongest effect can be implemented” (Cuttance, 2002: 6).
Effective learning, therefore, requires that attention be given to the needs of the individual learner, that teachers have a sound understanding of how learning occurs, and that school structures facilitate and enhance learning opportunities including the use of contemporary learning tools.
The process of collecting suitable data
The decision was made to carry out an ethnographic investigation. Two relevant Australian studies using student reflections included McLoughlin’s (2000) use of student voice in distance education; and Clarke’s (2001) comprehensive work on students’ perspectives in mathematics and science classrooms. This study, like Clarke, enables “the individual's construal of those events, the memories, beliefs and attitudes invoked, and the meanings and practices which arose as a consequence.”(Clarke 2001: 15).
Atkinson and Hammersley (Denzin and Lincoln 1994) state that ethnography usually refers to forms of social research with the following features: x a strong emphasis on exploring the nature of particular social phenomena, rather than setting out to test hypotheses x a tendency to work primarily with “unstructured” data , x investigation of a small number of cases x analysis of data that involves explicit interpretation of the meanings and functions of human actions, the product of which mainly takes the form of verbal descriptions and explanations, with quantification and statistical analysis playing a subordinate role at most (Denzin and Lincoln 1994: 248).
This research endeavours to see what is happening and what presently exists, rather than what could exist, where ‘qualitative researchers are non-interventionists’ (Stake 1995: 44). Miles and Huberman (1994) argue that qualitative data are a source of well-grounded, rich descriptions and explanations of processes occurring in a local context. The intent of this research was to observe long enough and to analyse what was happening in ordinary, natural circumstances (i.e. classrooms). It allows the issues to emerge from the many pieces of interconnecting evidence.
The key methods selected with this research include: x observation in middle-years classrooms as the central technique; x interviewing (including the use of video-recall scenarios) students; and x photography as a means to collect factual information in a visual form.
The use of a case study approach to examine student perceptions of learning with ICT became apparent as this study unfolded.
Selection of schools and students
In the initial stage of this study seven schools were selected in the case study. The seven schools made classroom observations possible that allowed the researcher to record initial assumptions about learning within ICT environments and began the
process of establishing relationships with teachers and students. Interviews with individuals were undertaken after classroom observations throughout the study. As the research developed and issues emerged a smaller number of classes became the qualitative focus for more intensive investigation. Whilst good data can be gathered using informal conversation during and after participant observations (i.e. unstructured interviewing), the decision to undertake semi-structured interviews in this study was designed to gain rich data from individual students and to allow opportunities for the researcher to explore and probe further. Interview guides were utilised to ensure certain topics were dealt with and typical questions were covered (Kurz, 1983). This occurred with 32 students over time, 16 initially in Year 6 and 16 initially in Year 7. Interviews were repeated with the same students in the following year after their transition into a new school or after their transfer into a new class.
The final part of the investigative study concentrated on the use of ‘video-recall’ events for 16 of the students to reconstruct orally their thoughts and actions. This technique included the use of captured video of students in the secondary classroom that was replayed to them after the observed lesson. This approach recognises aspects of Clarke’s (2001) methodology that undertook rigorous study combining videotape data with participants’ reconstructions in mathematics and science classrooms.
Selecting this research procedure enabled the researcher to probe the student’s reflective thinking, using video as a stimulus and invited students to explain specific learning moments. In addition, other audio-visual methods, including the taking of photographs at opportune times, captured a visual record of the students in their natural setting (Bogden & Biklen, 2003).
A focus on new technologies (ICT)
There is a broad optimism that ICT can and does support the kind of learning appropriate to the information age. For example, the ease of the technology frees up time for higher-order learning opportunities (Brown, 1994), it supports meaningful learning (Jonassen, 2000) and student autonomy (McLoughlin, 2000), at risk students are more likely to engage in literacy tasks (O'Rourke, 2001), it promotes active learning (Meredyth, Russell, Blackwood, Thomas, & Wise, 1999) and will enable the user to do new things rather than just old things better (Snyder, 1999). Furthermore, it is argued that computing technologies appropriately coupled with other educational innovations can increase the efficacy, efficiency, and extent of student’s self-regulated learning (Winne & Hadwin, 1998: 108).
The introduction of ICT does not, however, guarantee better learning for all students and not all researchers agree that educational technology is a panacea. Access to computers and the Internet does not mean new learning methods suddenly emerge. As Schacter (1999) points out, “we should not accept the rhetoric that technology makes learning easier and more efficient because ease and efficiency are not prerequisite conditions for deep and meaningful learning” (p 331).
If the inclusion of ICT is to be utilised effectively to engage middle-year students, it should be expected to provide a better option to the practices it is to replace. Given that we know interest levels decline throughout the middle-years of schooling (Hill &
Advances in technology will not make current teaching methodologies redundant. Rather, ICT should be grasped and applied in imaginative and creative ways to enhance cognitive learning for students (Gilliver, Randall, & Pok, 1999). The teacher’s awareness of the way an individual student will benefit from different learning experiences contributes to enhancing the learning process. The effects of the teacher and instructional styles constantly impact on students as they consciously and unconsciously gain new skills and knowledge.
By drawing together the literature that has focused on the role of ICT, the middle- years of schooling, and contemporary understanding of learning, key factors that impact on and shape effective learning have been identified as learning culture, social well-being, motivation and engagement, and thinking and learning. The relationship between these factors and the approach to learning has determined the analytical framework shown in the Table 1.
Table 1: Students approach to learning in the middle-years
Factors influencing student learning (learning process)
APPROACH TO LEARNING Surface Deep
Learning culture Teacher-centred Student-centred Transmission of knowledge Self-directed learning Social well-being Low self-efficacy High self-efficacy Peer pressure/alienated Social interaction Motivation and Engagement
Extrinsic Intrinsic Intention to complete tasks Intention to understand Integrating knowledge Thinking and learning
Low level thinking Higher cognitive strategies
The goal, in each of the factors, is to enrich the student’s approach to learning with the qualities associated with surface approaches with those of deep approaches. Deep learning strategies involve transformational processes that link new learning with past learning and are supported by intrinsic motivation (Ainley, 1993). Cognitive skills most appropriate to the knowledge society are those associated with deep learning. Such skills include higher-order thinking strategies: seeing connections between ideas and patterns, applying metacognitive skills, and the application of the skills of analysis, synthesis, evaluation, reflection and problem-solving. Deep learning is more likely to emerge from authentic learning experiences particularly when students are intrinsically motivated to learn.
To comprehend and capture the relationship between the factors, the use of student reflections describes how students think about their learning, and the effectiveness of ICT as a learning resource.
The learning culture and ICT
The learning culture encompasses such things as school setting, the influences of different groups of people within the organisation, curriculum management and delivery, values and traditions, and the school’s place in the community. The
provision of ICT as a learning resource/tool has created challenges for schools. In the first instance, the manner in which ICT can be deployed is determined by the school’s infrastructure, finances, classroom physical space, personnel and technical support. Individual schools adopt different organisational modelscomputer laboratories, computers interspersed in classrooms, individual laptops, or pods. Clearly these decisions impact on pedagogy and therefore the nature of learning and the learning culture.
Students identified some of the major influences that impact on the learning culture of a school. Through student-voice, the most critical aspects identified by students were: the impact of school structures between primary and secondary systems; access to technology; the continuity of skills and knowledge across curriculum domains; and the positive and negative impact of using ICT.
Curriculum frameworks and organisation are key determinants of a school’s learning culture. Curriculum continuity deals with the seamless development of learning outcomes across the middle-years spectrum. Primary teachers generally adopt an Integrated Curriculum approach (Murdoch, 1992; Wilson, 2003) that combines several key learning areas. The issue of curriculum continuity arises as part of the shift from an integrated curriculum in the primary years to the subject-discipline approach undertaken in secondary schools. Although a curriculum framework exists, the organisational shift from primary to secondary schooling is an impediment to continuous developmental learning. Secondary schools timetable blocks of time for students to spend time with teacher experts and are exposed to specialist subject knowledge (McInerney et al., 2001). New secondary students explained the learning situation and initial experiences with the secondary curriculum.
You change a lot because you have different ways of learning. You have periods and move to different classrooms instead of having the same teacher 1.
You have different subjects and all so you have to go to different class practically every period and it’s really different.
The lack of curriculum continuity affects academic adjustment and the quality of learning during the shift is a concern (Huggins & Knight, 1997). How schools make decisions about the placement of ICT resources also affects student learning. The two main issues raised by students were in regard to computer access and opportunity. From primary students there was consensus that the placement of computers in the classroom provided some regular access. We only have one computer in our room and the computer room is normally full.
We had six computers in our room. The main form of computer access observed in secondary schools was in computer labs. In fact, the main access for some classes in some secondary schools is restricted to Information Technology classes only, and these were further restricted in a timetable that provided class access within different school semesters. Last semester we did a class called Computers where we were taught how to use different programs.
(^1) Each quote is taken directly from an interview transcript with students from my Doctoral study.
The Internet restrictions at schools prevent student learning opportunities that may well be otherwise available in home environments. The issue of home access to ICT further compounds the role of the school and the impact on student learning within classroom environments. I find it (the Internet) slower than at home and it takes longer to find stuff…and I’m not as comfortable with it because I don’t know it as well as our computer at home.
I can always go home and look up stuff on our computer.
The issue of home access to ICT further compounds the role of the school and the impact on student learning within classroom environments. Access to computers in the home often includes more freedom to accessing Internet sites.
The positive and negative aspects of the use of ICT, as seen above, impact on effective learning for all. What becomes apparent from all these situations is that the role of the teacher plays a significant part of the learning potential when using ICT in the teaching-learning process.
Teachers’ subject knowledge, pedagogical skills, discipline, and enthusiasm are important determinants in establishing and maintaining the classroom learning culture. For most students who were asked, they value the teacher who is able to support them to integrate the technology effectively with their own knowledge-base. One of the teachers doesn’t know how to really use the computer, so she doesn’t understand if it’s hard or not. She’ll say, “Well, you should have done it by now”, but doesn’t know how hard it is. I gave her a disk one time and she wouldn’t accept it. I had to take it home and (re)type it up.
Some of our teachers don’t know how to use a computer, so they really can’t help us out when we’re stuck, so a lot of the boys in our grade help us out.
The remarks from the students suggest teachers are needed to support the students to deal with technical matters associated with ICT, and to understand the degree of effort put into the use of some applications.
Social support and success in learning
Rowe (2002) and Kindermann (1996) report that students who experience support from their teachers are more likely to be engaged in learning. Regardless of the teaching methodologies, what remains critical to good learning is the quality of the relationship between student and teacher (Pomeroy, 1999) and student support of one another. I like having one teacher for a lot of subjects. Like we have [teacher] for Science and Maths and as our form teacher. I think it helps a lot more when you know the teacher a lot better and they kind of understand how you work.
In the given example the student identified the value the teacher brings to understanding his/her needs as a learner, and as a developing adolescent the importance of the relationship between him/herself and the teacher.
A major constraint on developing relationships with teachers in a subject discipline environment lies in the restrictive nature of the timetable. For example, one Year 7 student remarked; Because you’ve got the primary school teacher for nearly every class, here you change around that much they [teachers] don’t get to know you very well. This was supported by another comment: [With] less teachers…you get to know your teachers better, whereas if you have heaps of teachers, one for each different subject, you don’t really get to know them as well. Both comments show the value the students place on having a good working relationship with teachers that contribute to more effective learning.
The timetable is a main source of contention for effective learning (McInerney, Hattam, & Smyth, 2001; Nixon, Martin, McKeown, & Ranson, 1996) and reform efforts (e.g. Middle Years Research and Development) suggest more contact time between teachers and students can improve relationships and lead to better understanding of students’ learning capabilities. This will have an impact on teacher support for students.
Schools and teachers will often deliberately set up computers so as to support peer- learning situations. Such learning opportunities play a major part in constructing a student-centred learning environment (Sandholtz, Ringstaff, & Dwyer, 1997) and affords opportunities for collaborative modes of learning that lead to learning gains (O'Rourke, 2001; Thompson, 2004). The idea is to have at least two students purposefully sharing one computer. The shared arrangements, according to one teacher, are deliberately implemented to encourage students to scaffold learning, share ideas and assist each other when using ICT. Students provide evidence about the impact of having to work with a partner. There are those who appreciate the support,
I think it’s more fun if you work with others because you get a few laughs out of it. It’s easier to think up heaps of ideas.
Probably only have one computer, because then you could say, try this, or that didn’t work, I’ve got an idea now try that.
and those that prefer their independence: Alone, because that way it’s your own choice again. I find it easier to work by myself than have someone saying they won’t do this, or, do that.
You’d learn better on your own, but if you needed help I think you should do the same thing, but use two computers.
Working with partners requires negotiation and collaboration. For some students, the sharing of computers presents as an inconvenience and their sense of autonomous decision-making is affected. However, a key finding according to all of the students is that the use of shared arrangements with the computer is dependant on the particular task at the time. It is succinctly stated by one student: Depends what I’m using. Sometimes I like to work on my own. When I’m using Word and typing up a story I like to be alone, so I can think properly. But if I’m looking for stuff on the Internet, looking for stuff for projects, I like to be with people.
When you’re in groups you can use, instead of having one person’s knowledge you can have two people’s knowledge. [80]
I was focusing there on the picture and the information we had found. Then I was reading the notes my partner wrote. The evidence from the students supports activities such as project work, group work, problem-solving, and reflective thought (Ravitz, Becker, & Wong, 2000) that are key parts of student-centred learning. For these students there is genuine interest in learning.
Often, middle-years students are encouraged to learn for extrinsic motivational reasons such as exams or tests which provide a powerful incentive to work (Gipps & Stobart, 1993). Instead of writing down a project you can type it up. It’s tidier and you get better marks for presentation. [60]
I did one (project) in Geography and SOSE. When I was doing it I ended up typing it all out on the computer. It looks better. You get better marks.
The student comments show that they are aware of strategies that reward their efforts. However, the compulsion to complete the tasks implies the quality of the learning experience will be minimal and unlikely to inspire the students to understand. If the main motive is to do the learning because you have to there is unlikely to be any long term learning gain. I didn’t get much out of it. There weren’t many answers, like there weren’t answers at the end of it like you could tick or cross if you got right or wrong. That for me is how I know I’ve done well or not.
From this evidence, the final product continues to be seen by many students as the most important part of the learning process. However, research indicates that the use of ICT can develop new forms of learning and ICT into schools has helped to create environments that are more relevant to our information economy (Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs, 2001): aspects of student-centred learning.
In student-centred classrooms there is a focus on individual learning where students are in more control of their learning, use social collaboration, and accept the teacher as facilitator rather than as transmitter of knowledge. It is hoped that the technology will actually change the characteristics of problems and learning tasks, and hence play an important task as mediator of cognitive development, enhancing the acquisation of generic cognitive competencies as essential for life in our knowledge society.
The fact that virtually all students believe computers enable hands-on opportunities because they physically push buttons, control a mouse, move the cursor, use different software applications, explore the Internet by following prompts, and comprehend (or not) what’s moving on the screen (as opposed to the still text of a book), can change cognitive skills. A computer…it’s just more fun. In a book…just the way they pronounce it it’s really boring, but on a computer it’s like really colorful and stuff. Some of the web pages and everything, you can click on things and they pop out on the page, instead in a book it’s just a page with writing.
I suppose the difference is without computers you’re just doing it on paper and reading. On computers you’re doing it hands-on.
The computer gives the students a sense of ownership of the task at hand. For some students, the hands-on experience with a computer is an intrinsic motive that is sufficient to engage them in learning tasks. However, it must be realised that the use of ICT as a preferred learning approach does not suit all learners. … if you’re reading out of a text book the information’s just there. You can’t ask any more questions. Same with the computer. But, if you’re having a class discussion you can raise your hand and ask the teacher what you want to know. With the others you can’t do that.
The use of technology creates a different learning approach, resulting in different attitudes to learning, levels of motivation and engagement, and therefore different attainment levels. Cuttance (2001), Schater (1999), Calnin (1998) and British Educational Computing and Technology Agency (2004) conclude that the use of ICT will result in positive gains in student achievement. However, one of the key difficulties in determining shifts in thinking and problem-solving is that they are difficult to measure.
In order to ascertain whether students are being provided with opportunities to utilise higher-cognitive skills, a deep learning approach where the intention is to understand, is considered vital to enhance learning, rather that a surface learning approach where the intention is mainly at completing tasks. (Bowring-Carr & West-Burnham, 1997; Entwistle, 1995; Ramsden, 1992)
Thinking and learning approaches with ICT
Students’ recollections of learning can provide evidence of whether the student is engaged in surface or deep learning. Surface learning approaches include tasks that involve low-level thinking, primarily those consisting of reproducing information, memorising information or where the student’s sole intention is the completion of the task. When the given tasks demand more than routine effort and demand the use of higher cognitive strategies by challenging the students’ thinking, these are considered to be deep learning approaches. Deep learning approaches include the intention to understand, relating previous knowledge to new knowledge, and discovering relationships between ideas.
Critical to engaged learning, with the use of ICT, is a constructivist perspective that emphasises student-centred learning environments where teachers foster and nurture more autonomous forms of learning. There are clearly definable instances from student recollections that outline the learning approach with ICT that is occurring in middle-years classrooms. The majority of comments obtained from students provide evidence of the dominance of surface learning approaches in classroom learning situations.
All the stuff we wrote down we have already learnt. We wrote the rough copy and we were just typing it.
…notes we took out of books and just typed them up.
running short of time to complete the task as first intended. The student has assessed his own progress and realised the need to modify his thinking. On the computer it’s a lot easier as well because when I was doing it at the start, I was doing a guide to all the Egyptian Gods, but then I sort of changed my mind and thought, the deadline’s Monday it will take way too long. I wouldn’t be able to do that. So, I’ve just done it down to a profile of one God, like a big profile on him, and I wasn’t actually planning that, but if I had of done it with a pen and paper…
The student was able to use self-regulation strategies: he understood the learning task, set goals, evaluated his own progress, adapted and modified his attempts, and then revised his final product.
Analysing data
Another important thinking skill is that associated with the analysis of data. When students construct and query databases, they are building and exemplifying structural models of the content they are studying, and are comparing and contrasting relationships between information contained in their models. Databases and spreadsheets function as cognitive tools for enhancing, extending, amplifying and restructuring the way students think about the content they are studying (Jonassen, 2000). Evidence of this deep approach is seen in the example below:
Because, it was a lot easier to notice and stuff. When we typed up the graph it went into this graph thing (from an Excel spreadsheet), line graph, and we could actually notice it.
The student, having received teacher instruction, has time to explore, and then pursue his/her own learning needs.
Testing hypothesis
When the ICT encourages the end-user to test hypotheses, it provides students with an opportunity to ask new questions, and think more deeply about further possibilities: it is a ‘what-if’ approach which is open-ended rather than the closed approach of predetermined answers. Without a computer, the exploration of alternatives is less feasible (Evans, 1986). One student tests out his own hypothesis while working with the Internet. You just got to think how because if you’re typing something that has ten thousand answers to your word, you’ve got to cut it down to a smaller thing. If you type in ‘trees’ heaps come up, but if you type in ‘gum trees’ it might come up less. Make it not as many to choose from, narrow it down.
In the case shown the student refines the searching that tests out his thinking in his quest for more accurate information. However, other students find the open-ended nature of searching inhibits their learning. Well it’s a good thing (the Internet) if you know what you’re looking for specifically, but if you’re just hoping that something will come up, it’s really hard to find stuff.
Yes there’s hardly anything. If you’re doing a project on something a little bit different from normal, you can’t learn anything from the Internet.
I like books because the Internet’s really hard to find, like the specific information you want. I go to ‘search’ and type in what we’re looking for and sometimes it comes up if it’s a subject that a lot of people look for but, if it’s not, you probably won’t get anything out of it.
Students often commented on open-ended ‘surfing’ through the Internet, and were alert to how it impacted on their learning. For some students, they do not have the necessary skills, such as the ability to refine their search, to evaluate relevance of information, or to monitor and self-direct search strategies, and therefore the opportunity to test out any hypothetical problem-solving.
Problem-solving
Problem-solving tasks are intended to challenge and engage students to promote higher-order thinking. One of the key aspects of effective problem-solving tasks for students is to encourage metacognitive thinking strategies (Hacker, 1998). Given that every problem has three partsgivens, a goal and obstaclesmetacognition will allow the student to identify the problem and work strategically (Davidson & Sternberg, 1998). A small number of students highlighted the value of ICT in assisting with their problem-solving strategies.
In the example shown, the student worked with a partner (peer learning) and was required to dissect a bull’s eye so as to be able to identify and describe various parts of the eye. We got a digital camera but had to share the camera around the room and …like my partner who kind of worked with me on the project, she dissected most of the eye ball and I took most of the photos. When you’ve taken the photos you can look back on it and then find out what you’ve been working for.
The students were able to work collaboratively and the digital camera enabled them to reflect on their learning experience. The use of ICT provided the means to reconstruct key moments through the use of visual prompts, and facilitated a problem-solving strategy for the students.
Teachers used multimedia and programming exercises as part of problem-solving. According to Papert (1980) students acquire powerful problem-solving tools by learning to program. Underwood (1990) suggests computer-based learning, such as Logo, intrinsically motivates students. Much of the early research from Papert’s (1980) development of Logo (the basis for Microworlds) claims that teaching programming to students provides transferable skills (e.g. planning), seen to be integral to problem-solving (Calnin, 1998). Robotics provides similar programming experiences and is becoming a more commonly used programming tool.
What we (a group of students) had to do is, you get a little brick (car), they call them bricks, they’ve got the batteries and everything. We made it first, then you have to program it and you have to experiment, because you’ve got to make it go for a certain amount of seconds, and one wheel stops and the other will keep
communication means to contact friends and family. This was confirmed by student comments: Email’s good. It’s fun at school. It’s just a little email thing that we can send to our friends.
Emailing’s all right. I can talk to my friends there but I’d much rather see my friends than talk to them on the Internet.
I like email because I can write to my friends at my other school.
All three examples, whilst they encourage fun and interest, are surface learning approaches and are not connected to the learning tasks.
Another form of electronic communication includes chat rooms that enable instant messagingsynchronous communication (Maddux et al., 2001). It’s like you type something and they type back straight away.
For many students, this form of communication is a preferred option to the asynchronous email forum:
Some kids made their own chat group [talking about a home experience] so we could talk to each other, both girls and boys.
I usually chat to people in other classes that I know. I don’t think it teaches you anything except that it’s fun.
The use of ICT for communicative purposes continues to evolve in classroom environments. One of the distinct difficulties is trying to integrate the communication tools effectively into a curriculum framework that is predominantly focused on achieving specific outcomes within subject disciplines.
Discussion
The evidence indicates that students often adopt surface approaches to fulfil work commitments without the intention of aspiring to understand and extend prior knowledge. ICT has simply made the task easier and more efficient, and allowed the final product to be presented at a higher standard. Whilst the use and familiarisation of basic technology skills can free the student to apply higher cognitive demands, the voice from students highlights an overemphasis on surface learning approaches.
The findings from this paper show that:
x The inclusion of ICT into the learning environment has created a greater focus on the collaboration and interaction between and among many studentsʊaspects of student-centred environments. The support and guidance from the teacher remains important. The majority of students valued learning with ICT when it was relevant, gave them ownership, control and autonomy, and was conducted in environments that supported a climate of collegiality.
x Many students noted that the use of the Internet at school often inhibited their learning. Often students preferred to access the Internet at home as there were
fewer limitations and the familiarity of the home resources made it easier to use as a learning tool.
x Intrinsically motivated students were more goal-oriented toward achieving and pursuing new learning with more effort and persistence. Student activity around and in a computer environment can mask the true learning approach of the individual student. This means that the ‘busyness’ of a student will not automatically equate to active or deep learning. Meaningful learning was often associated with project-based learning where students were encouraged to integrate content through inquiry-based tasks.
x When the learning tasks provide little opportunity for students to explore their thinking and understanding, most students were generally passive learners. While the use of ICT has been regarded as a tool to transform thinking and learning, it can actually promote surface learning approaches. Many students often described moments where the sole intent was to reproduce or regurgitate information. The use of higher cognitive thinking was evident in tasks when ICT was purposefully integrated with subject content.
The aim of this paper was to provide insights into classroom learning supported by ICT. In implementing any strategy to improve the quality of learning there is arguably considerable benefit in studying the effect on students, and looking at the experience through their eyes. This paper has concentrated on two of Hargreaves (2004) gateways to personalising learning: student voice and the use of new technologies (ICT).
References:
Ainley, M., Bourke, V., Chatfield, R., Hillman, K., & Watkins, I. (2000). Laptops, computers and tools. Melbourne: ACER Press. Ainley, M. D. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Mulitdimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (3), 395-405. Ainley, M. D. (2001). Interest in learning and classroom interactions. In D Clarke (Ed.), Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle years. Review of Educational Research, 64 (2), 287 - 309. Bowring-Carr, C., & West-Burnham, J. (1997). Effective learning in schools. London: Pitman Publishing. Braggett, E. (1997). The middle years of schooling: An Australian perspective. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow Education. British Educational Computing and Technology Agency. (2004). ICT an attainment. Retrieved 12 July, 2004, from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/display.cfm Brown, A. (1994). Processes to support the use of information technology to enhance learning. In Computers Assisted Learning (Vol. 22, pp. 145-153). Bruner, J. (1985). Models of a learner. Educational Researcher (June/July), 5-8. Calnin, G. T. (1998). Laptop computers: Changes in teachers' practice. Unpublished Doctor of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.