Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Nitration of Methyl Benzoate: Monosubstitution and Position of Substitution, Study notes of Chemistry

An in-depth exploration of the nitration of methyl benzoate, focusing on monosubstitution versus polysubstitution and the position of substitution. The factors influencing monosubstitution, including electronic and steric effects, and the impact of pre-existing substituents on the position of substitution. The document also includes a detailed reaction procedure and safety precautions.

What you will learn

  • Why does the reactivity of the monosubstitution product influence whether monosubstitution or polysubstitution occurs?
  • How do electronic and steric effects impact monosubstitution in the nitration of methyl benzoate?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

chiara44
chiara44 🇺🇸

4.7

(11)

245 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Jasperse Chem 365
Nitration Lab
1
NITRATION OF METHYL BENZOATE
General Issues with Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions:
Aromatic substitution reactions involve the substitution of one (or more) aromatic
hydrogens with electrophiles. Two major synthetic issues are always involved.
1. Monosubsitution versus Polysubstitution
Because there is more than one benzene hydrogen available, can the reaction be
disciplined so that monosubstition occurs rather than polysubstitution?
Selective monosubstition is possible only if the monosubstitution product is less
reactive than the original reactant. If the reactivity of the monosubstitution product
equals or exceeds that of the original reactant, the monosubstitution product(s) will
proceed on to polysubstitution products.
There are two reasons why a monosubstitution product might be less reactive:
o Electronic reasons. If the “E group” that added is electron withdrawing, it will
make the product aromatic ring less electron rich and subsequently less reactive
toward subsequent electrophilic addition.
o Steric reasons. Replacement of a small H with a larger “E group” will make the
monosubstitution product more crowded, which may interfere with subsequent
addition of additional electrophiles.
ZZ
E
acid
E-X
H
H
H
H
H
H-X +
ZZ
E
E
meta ortho para
monosubstitution products
++++etc.
Z Z
EEEE
E
double
substitution
triple
substitition
polysubstitution products
2. Position of Substitution: Ortho, Meta, or Para To a Pre-existing Substituent?
Even if a reaction can be disciplined such that monosubstitution occurs to the
exclusion of double or triple substitution, what happens when substitution occurs on a
benzene that already has a substituent attached (Z H)? Will ortho, meta, and para
hydrogens be substituted with equal ease, so that a statistical mixture of ortho-, meta-,
and para-disubstituted products form? Or will substitution be selective? Somewhat
selective substitution is ordinarily possible based on two reasons:
o Electronic reasons. Rate-determining addition of E+ occurs with differing speeds
because of the electronic impact of Z on the delocalized cationic charge. If Z is
an electron donor, it will stabilize positive charge and facilitate ortho and para
addition relative to meta addition. If Z is an electron withdrawer, it will
destabilize positive charge and deactivate ortho and para addition relative to meta
addition.
o Steric reasons. Depending on the size of both Z and E, they will interact to
varying degrees in the pathway leading to the ortho product. Thus the ortho
product is normally destabilized for steric reasons relative to either the meta or the
para products.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Nitration of Methyl Benzoate: Monosubstitution and Position of Substitution and more Study notes Chemistry in PDF only on Docsity!

Nitration Lab

NITRATION OF METHYL BENZOATE

General Issues with Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions : Aromatic substitution reactions involve the substitution of one (or more) aromatic hydrogens with electrophiles. Two major synthetic issues are always involved.

1. Monosubsitution versus Polysubstitution - Because there is more than one benzene hydrogen available, can the reaction be disciplined so that monosubstition occurs rather than polysubstitution? - Selective monosubstition is possible only if the monosubstitution product is less reactive than the original reactant. If the reactivity of the monosubstitution product equals or exceeds that of the original reactant, the monosubstitution product(s) will proceed on to polysubstitution products. - There are two reasons why a monosubstitution product might be less reactive: o Electronic reasons. If the “E group” that added is electron withdrawing, it will make the product aromatic ring less electron rich and subsequently less reactive toward subsequent electrophilic addition. o Steric reasons. Replacement of a small H with a larger “E group” will make the monosubstitution product more crowded, which may interfere with subsequent addition of additional electrophiles. Z Z E acid E-X H H H H H H-X + Z Z E meta (^) ortho E para monosubstitution products

  • +^ +^ +^ etc. Z Z E E^ E^ E E double substitution triple substitition polysubstitution products 2. Position of Substitution: Ortho, Meta, or Para To a Pre-existing Substituent?
    • Even if a reaction can be disciplined such that monosubstitution occurs to the exclusion of double or triple substitution, what happens when substitution occurs on a benzene that already has a substituent attached (Z ≠ H)? Will ortho, meta, and para hydrogens be substituted with equal ease, so that a statistical mixture of ortho-, meta-, and para-disubstituted products form? Or will substitution be selective? Somewhat selective substitution is ordinarily possible based on two reasons: o Electronic reasons. Rate-determining addition of E+^ occurs with differing speeds because of the electronic impact of Z on the delocalized cationic charge. If Z is an electron donor, it will stabilize positive charge and facilitate ortho and para addition relative to meta addition. If Z is an electron withdrawer, it will destabilize positive charge and deactivate ortho and para addition relative to meta addition. o Steric reasons. Depending on the size of both Z and E, they will interact to varying degrees in the pathway leading to the ortho product. Thus the ortho product is normally destabilized for steric reasons relative to either the meta or the para products.

Nitration Lab General Mechanism for an Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution : The general mechanism for all electrophilic aromatic substitutions is summarized below. First, a reactive electrophile E+^ must be generated by interaction of a reactant with acid (either a Lewis acid or a normal Bronsted acid). The mechanism for the E+^ formation depends on the electrophile. Once an active electrophile is available, it adds to an aromatic ring to give a cationic intermediate. The allylic nature of the cation means that it always has at least three meaningful resonance structures, and sometimes more. The positive charge is always distributed to the carbons that are ortho and para relative to the carbon to which the electrophile has added. Notice that the carbon to which addition occurs is temporarily tetrahedral, and that the ring temporarily loses it’s aromaticity when addition occurs. Once the cation has formed, subsequent deprotonation (from the carbon onto which the electrophile has added), aromaticity is restored. The two steps, electrophilic addition followed by loss of the proton, constitute a “substitution”; the electrophile takes the place of the hydrogen on the ring. H acid E-X

E+ E+^ H^ E E -H+

  • resonance structures electrophile formation electrophile addition deprotonation General Mechanism for Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Today’s Actual Reaction : CO 2 Me HNO 3 H 2 SO 4 CO 2 Me NO 2 Methyl Benzoate MW = 136. density = 1. Methyl 3-Nitrobenzoate MW = 181. mp 78˚C Reaction Procedure:
  1. From a buret, add 6 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid directly to a 50-mL Erlenmeyer flask. (If you don't have a very clean Erlenmeyer, do not wash now! The water will do more harm than any residue that may be present.)
  2. Cool the solution in an ice bath.
  3. Measure out 2.00 mL of methyl benzoate via syringe from the reagent bottle, and inject it directly from the syringe into the cooled sulfuric acid solution.
  4. From a buret, measure about 1.4 mL of concentrated nitric acid into your 10mL graduated cylinder. The accuracy does not need to be high. Then add the nitric acid dropwise, by long-

Nitration Lab

  1. Once you think you have optimized your solvent conditions for the recrystallization, remove the flask from the heat bath and let the solution cool slowly on a watch class with a beaker over the top to prevent further solvent evaporation.
  2. After cooling to room temperature, cool it on ice, and suction filter to get the purified product.
  3. Be sure to rinse your crystals; what would be an appropriate wash solvent or solvent combination to use?
  4. Let the crystals dry for at least a day before coming in to get mass yield and to take a melting point. When you take your melting point of the recrystallized material, also take a melting point of the crude material in order to compare so you can see whether recrystallizing actually helped.
  5. Typical yields should be 40-80%, with a melting point slightly depressed 74-76˚. NMR/IR: None required. Caution: Safety Note: Both conc. sulfuric acid and conc. nitric acid are very potent and will dissolve you, your clothes, your papers, or anything else they touch! Avoid pouring; try to use burets/pipets exclusively, or as much as possible. Rinse your glassware and pipets thoroughly with water after usage. Cleanup: If an aqueous acid waste bottle is out, put your original solution (following filtration) into that. If not, dilute the original solution with water, neutralize with sodium carbonate (expect it to fizz!), and pour down the drain. Pour the methanol from the recrystallization into the organic waste container. Questions:
  6. Draw the mechanism for the reaction.
  7. If you didn’t already do so in your answer to question 1, draw out the three resonance structures for the carbocationic intermediate after NO 2 addition (prior to proton loss).
  8. The ortho product is not formed to a significant extent. Draw the carbocationic intermediate that would be involved in the formation of the ortho product (had it actually formed), and its resonance structures. Explain why ortho product formation is much slower than meta- product formation. (Hint: is the CO 2 Me substituent an electron donor or withdrawer? A cation stabilizer or destabilizer?)
  9. In the experiment, an excess of nitric acid was used. Given that the nitro group is an electron-withdrawing group, explain why your reaction stopped with mostly only single nitration but didn’t go on further to give lots of double nitration? Lab Report: Standard synthesis lab report format.