
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Nomothetic versus idiographic approaches to psychology in describes difference as definitions, assumptions, methodology, examples from psychology and advantages and disadvantages.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
groups of people in order to find general laws of behaviour that apply to everyone The approach of investigating individuals in personal, in-depth detail to achieve a unique understanding of them.
approach assumes that an individual is a complex combination of many universal laws; it is best to study people on a large scale. Idios= ‘private’ or ‘personal’ in ancient Greek; this approach assumes that humans are unique.
are best to identify the universal laws governing behaviour. The individual will be classified with others and measured as a score upon a dimension , or be a statistic supporting a general principle (‘averaging’). Qualitative methods are best; case study method will provide a more complete and global understanding of the individual who should be studied using flexible, long terms and detailed procedures in order to put them in a ‘class of their own’.
The nomothetic approach is the main approach within scientifically oriented psychology.
abiding nature of science, useful in predicting and controlling behaviour; nomothetic findings on prejudice and discrimination perhaps helpful (_reduce discrimination) More complete and global understanding of an individual; sometimes the most efficient; often lead to results that spark off experimental investigation of behaviour.
person; even if two persons have same IQ they may have answered different questions in the test; a person may have 1% chance of developing depression (but is he among the 1%?); classification manuals are not accurate and does not help people. Difficult to generalise findings; Freud and Piaget created universal theories on the basis of a limited and unrepresentative sample; Idiographic research tends to be more unreliable and unscientific (subjective, long term and unstandardised procedures)