





























Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This lecture is from Environmental Economics. Key important points are: Non Renewable Resources, Environmental Economics, Natural Resources Theory, Applied Studies of Theory, Energy Security, Valuation Issues, Climate Change, Health Warning, More Advanced, Conrad and Clark
Typology: Slides
1 / 37
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
H [ q , x ,^ λ^ , t ]=^ π[ q , x , t ]+^ λ g ( x , q , t ) profit plus change in stock valued by shadow price. To maximise => = 0 ∂ ∂ q H and λ
= − ∂ ∂ x H These conditions and equation of motion (change in x) give a set of differential equations which define an optimal solution. (it also has to satisfy travers ality conditions but we won ’t go into this – see HSW 186 - 188)
Time Price r P t dP dt = ( ) / Quantity Price of Backstop (^) • Resource is progressively exhausted on the price path.
Effect is similar to an decrease in the price of the substitute – you extract faster. With unanticipated discoveries we see the following pattern:
Assumptions:
μ t^ /^ μt The equilibrium, where the firm is indifferent between which asset held, can only occur if price of the asset appreciates, ie
μ t^ >0^ at the own rate of return of the numeraire asset. This is called Hotelling’s Rule. For example, if a firm precommiting to supply a resource over a number of time periods then the forward price would have to satisfy Hotelling’s rule – i.e. a rise at least at the rate of return of the numeraire, otherwise firm better off extracting all in t=1 and investing the proceeds in the numeraire.
Assume that equilibrium is reached where the growth in each period equals the harvest rate, ie ( )= ( *, *)= 0
xt g x q This is a steady-state equilibrium. Hence the total value of the stock over an infinite time horizon, with constant prices and no harvest costs is : ∫ ∞ (^) − = = 0 (*, *) ( *, *) r pg x q W pgx q dt e rt Where e
− r pg e dx dW (^) rt x