
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Its a research note on section 498A of IPC
Typology: Summaries
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh [(2007) 4 SCC 511] 100. Apart from this, the concept of mental cruelty cannot remain static; it is bound to change with the passage of time, impact of modern culture through print and electronic media and value system, etc. etc. What may be mental cruelty now may not remain a mental cruelty after a passage of time or vice versa. There can never be any straitjacket formula or fixed parameters for determining mental cruelty in matrimonial matters. The prudent and appropriate way to adjudicate the case would be to evaluate it on its peculiar facts and circumstances….” Shri Siba Prosad Basu Versus Sm. Gouri Basu 1993 SCC OnLine Cal 301 : (1994) 1 CHN 324
10. Cruelty in the legal sense need not necessarily be physical. What constitutes mental cruelty depends upon various factors including the mores of the society to which the parties belong, their value standard, their status, environment of the parties, their educational and cultural developments etc. ( Bijoli v. Sukomal , AIR 1979 Cal. 87). As in constructive desertion, so in cruelty, intention should be distinguished from desire and cruelty can be established where the respondent is guilty of conduct which he must know would have an injurious effect on the petitioner, although he may in fact have no desire to cause injury. ( Waters v. Waters , (1956) 1 All E.R. 432).