Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Nozick Entitlement Theory, Slides of Political Philosophy

Nozick entitlement theory in explain three principles, intuitive arguments for the entitlement theory and problems with the intuitive arguments.

Typology: Slides

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

sureesh
sureesh 🇺🇸

4.8

(9)

243 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Nozick’s Entitlement Theory
Libertarian approach to justice
Based on a Lockean conception of
property
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Nozick Entitlement Theory and more Slides Political Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

Nozick’s Entitlement Theory

 Libertarian approach to justice

 Based on a Lockean conception of property

3 Principles

 Principle of Transfer whatever is justly acquired can be freely transferred.

 Principle of Just Initial Acquisition an account of how people come initially to own the things that can be transferred in accordance with principle (1)

 Principle of Rectification of Injustice how to deal with holdings if they were unjustly acquired or transferred.

Ambition vs. Endowment

Unlike Rawls’s theory, Nozick’s theory is not ‘endowment - sensitive’ but is ‘ambition - sensitive’

 According to Nozick, only the minimalist state is the only morally justified state  Enforcement of contracts  Protection against force and fraud

Intuitive argument for the

entitlement theory

 D1: Just distribution of goods is provided by some rule R

 D2: State which results from the movement from D1 according to principle(s) P.

 If D1 is a just distribution, and the exchange of goods that results in D is not forced, then D2 is just.

Problem with the intuitive

argument

 Nozick stacks the deck by assuming that the rules and principles supporting D1 call for an absolute right to property. It may be that our initial just distribution would look Rawlsian