Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Insights on Foraminifera Isotope in Ocean Current Reversals during Palaeocene-Eocene Therm, Study notes of Biology

A study conducted by oceanographers flavia nunes and richard norris from the university of california, san diego, who analyzed fossilized sea creatures called foraminifera to understand how ocean currents changed during the palaeocene-eocene thermal maximum (petm) about 55 million years ago. The researchers found that the deep-water flow in the atlantic ocean reversed direction during this period, and the switch took just a few thousand years but took 100,000 years to revert. The findings are significant as they provide insights into how earth responded to past climate change and could help scientists better understand the potential impacts of modern climate change on ocean currents.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/19/2009

koofers-user-ikx
koofers-user-ikx 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
08/29/2006 10:15 AMOcean currents flip out
Page 1 of 2file:///Users/evatop/Documents/Courses/Courses/2006/Biol411-Fall06/Climate_OceanFlips.webarchive
All change: the ocean currents have
flipped directions in the past, and could
do so again.
© Getty Originals
If the ocean flips on
us we may be living
with that change for a
long, long time.
Richard Norris,
oceanographer
University of
California, San Diego
Close window
Published online: 4 January 2006; | doi:10.1038/news060102- 5
Ocean currents flip out
Global warming millions of years ago put seas in a spin.
Mark Peplow
The circulation of the deep oceans reversed abruptly some 55 million years ago, according to a study
of fossilized sea creatures. This rings alarm bells about today's climate change, because the reversal
coincided with a period of global warming driven by greenhouse gases.
Deep ocean currents are intimately linked to our climate, and are driven by colder, saltier water at
the poles plummeting to the bottom of the ocean. Recent studies have suggested that the circulation
of the North Atlantic could be weakened by the influx of fresh water from melting polar ice. As this
watery conveyor belt also brings warm water northwards from the tropics, some scientists fear that a
major shift in the circulation could plunge western Europe into a deep freeze.
Although computer models can predict how ocean circulation reacts to global warming, many
researchers prefer to look for similar situations in the past to see how Earth responded. One useful
period to look at is the Palaeocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) about 55 million years ago,
when the average temperature of the oceans shot up by 7 or 8 °C.
Flavia Nunes and Richard Norris, oceanographers at the University of California, San Diego, have now
worked out how ocean currents changed during the PETM, they report in Nature1. They have read
the chemical records held in the shells of tiny fossilized deep- sea creatures called foraminifera.
Carbon capture
Using samples from the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, Norris and Nunes studied the relative amounts of two isotopes of carbon in the
shells. This acts as a snapshot of the carbon isotope ratios in the deep water that surrounded the creatures.
Scientists already knew that as a water mass travels along the deep section of the ocean's conveyor
belt, it becomes enriched in carbon- 12 compared with carbon-13. This is because it has more time to
accumulate organic matter falling from dead creatures in surface waters, and these creatures tend to use
more carbon- 12 than carbon- 13 in building their tissue.
Comparing the composition of foraminifera shells at different locations throughout the Pacific and Atlantic
Oceans, the scientists found that a gradient in the ratio of carbon isotopes revealed which way the
oceans' conveyor belts were turning during the PETM. They found that although the Atlantic's deep -water
flow normally travels from south to north, it ran in the opposite direction during the period of global
warming. Similar flips were seen in other oceans around the world.
Perhaps most remarkable is how abrupt the changes were. "The switch in circulation took just a few
thousand years," says Norris. "But then it took 100,000 years to revert."
"So if the ocean flips on us we may be living with that change for a long, long time," he adds. "It's sort of frightening."
Measurements have recently shown that the Atlantic current is lessening (see 'Atlantic currents show signs of weakening'), but researchers
are divided about whether modern climate change will be enough to force the current to stop or flip.
Old waters run deep
The research confirms computer models of 55-million -year -old ocean currents made by Karen Bice, an oceanographer at Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts and her colleagues2.
Although scientists have found evidence of similar links between ocean current and climate in the last 200,000 years, Bice says that the
PETM is a much better analogue for the climate change we see today, because it occurred in a world that was warming gradually in
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Insights on Foraminifera Isotope in Ocean Current Reversals during Palaeocene-Eocene Therm and more Study notes Biology in PDF only on Docsity!

Ocean currents flip out 08/29/2006 10:15 AM file:///Users/evatop/Documents/Courses/Courses/2006/Biol411-Fall06/Climate_OceanFlips.webarchive Page 1 of 2 All change: the ocean currents have flipped directions in the past, and could do so again. © Getty Originals If the ocean flips on us we may be living with that change for a long, long time. Richard Norris, oceanographer

University of

California, San Diego

Close window Published online: 4 January 2006; | doi:10.1038/news060102-

Ocean currents flip out

Global warming millions of years ago put seas in a spin. Mark Peplow The circulation of the deep oceans reversed abruptly some 55 million years ago, according to a study of fossilized sea creatures. This rings alarm bells about today's climate change, because the reversal coincided with a period of global warming driven by greenhouse gases. Deep ocean currents are intimately linked to our climate, and are driven by colder, saltier water at the poles plummeting to the bottom of the ocean. Recent studies have suggested that the circulation of the North Atlantic could be weakened by the influx of fresh water from melting polar ice. As this watery conveyor belt also brings warm water northwards from the tropics, some scientists fear that a major shift in the circulation could plunge western Europe into a deep freeze. Although computer models can predict how ocean circulation reacts to global warming, many researchers prefer to look for similar situations in the past to see how Earth responded. One useful period to look at is the Palaeocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) about 55 million years ago, when the average temperature of the oceans shot up by 7 or 8 °C. Flavia Nunes and Richard Norris, oceanographers at the University of California, San Diego, have now worked out how ocean currents changed during the PETM, they report in Nature^1. They have read the chemical records held in the shells of tiny fossilized deep-sea creatures called foraminifera. Carbon capture Using samples from the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, Norris and Nunes studied the relative amounts of two isotopes of carbon in the shells. This acts as a snapshot of the carbon isotope ratios in the deep water that surrounded the creatures. Scientists already knew that as a water mass travels along the deep section of the ocean's conveyor belt, it becomes enriched in carbon-12 compared with carbon-13. This is because it has more time to accumulate organic matter falling from dead creatures in surface waters, and these creatures tend to use more carbon-12 than carbon-13 in building their tissue. Comparing the composition of foraminifera shells at different locations throughout the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, the scientists found that a gradient in the ratio of carbon isotopes revealed which way the oceans' conveyor belts were turning during the PETM. They found that although the Atlantic's deep-water flow normally travels from south to north, it ran in the opposite direction during the period of global warming. Similar flips were seen in other oceans around the world. Perhaps most remarkable is how abrupt the changes were. "The switch in circulation took just a few thousand years," says Norris. "But then it took 100,000 years to revert." "So if the ocean flips on us we may be living with that change for a long, long time," he adds. "It's sort of frightening." Measurements have recently shown that the Atlantic current is lessening (see 'Atlantic currents show signs of weakening'), but researchers are divided about whether modern climate change will be enough to force the current to stop or flip. Old waters run deep The research confirms computer models of 55-million-year-old ocean currents made by Karen Bice, an oceanographer at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts and her colleagues^2. Although scientists have found evidence of similar links between ocean current and climate in the last 200,000 years, Bice says that the PETM is a much better analogue for the climate change we see today, because it occurred in a world that was warming gradually in

Ocean currents flip out 08/29/2006 10:15 AM file:///Users/evatop/Documents/Courses/Courses/2006/Biol411-Fall06/Climate_OceanFlips.webarchive Page 2 of 2 response to rising greenhouse gas levels. Norris says that they do not know the specific trigger for the circulation flip. But it seems likely that a warming world saw more evaporation from tropical seas, leading to greater rainfall at higher latitudes, explains Bice. This in turn pours fresh water into the northern oceans, weakening their currents. "It's a good indicator of what could happen in our own future," warns Bice. Top References

  1. Nunes, F. & Norris, R. D. Nature 439 60–63 (2006). | Article |
  2. Bice, K. L., K. L. & Marotzke, J. Paleoceanography 17 (2002) doi: 10.1029/2001PA000678. Top Story from news@nature.com: http://news.nature.com//news/2006/060102/060102-5.html © 2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy