






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The clinical application of Cloninger's theory of temperament and character (TCI) for diagnosing personality disorders. The authors suggest interpreting low self-directedness (SD) as a personality disorder trend or diagnosis based on standard deviations. They also explore the relationship between specific temperament traits and personality disorder subtypes. The TCI questionnaire, which assesses novelty seeking (NS), harm avoidance (HA), reward dependence (RD), and persistence (PE), has been used to identify personality disorders in various populations. insights into the clinical possibilities and experience with healthy populations, as well as the affinity to personality disorders in TCI. The aim is to give a clinical instruction on evaluating TCI results with regard to personality disorders and finding links for different ages.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 10
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Marek Preiss Prague Psychiatric Centre Prague, Czech Republic Jiri Klose Central Military Hospital Prague Prague, Czech Republic
Summary
Authors present clinically useful approach of personality disorder diagnostics on the base of low self-directedness (SD) in Cloninger´s Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) and configuration of temperament traits of novelty seeking, harm avoidance and reward dependence. Temperament trait were assessed in male general population (N=543, age 19-28) and older population (N=91, age 48-76; N=125, age 22-68). We suggest to interpret SD under 1-2 standard deviations as a personality disorder trend and SD under 2 standard deviations as a personality disorder. We discuss relevance for military psychological selection.
Persons with specific personality disorders are subjects of common problems of general medical practice as well as of psychiatric practice. The classification of personality disorders belongs to the most difficult and controversial chapters of the psychiatric classification. Their general prevalence is stated between 6 and 9 % (according to Smolik,
findings that make this theory (TCI) suitable for the practical diagnostics. Any attempt of a clinical algorithm of using TCI for the diagnostics of personality disorders has not been recorded yet. Normal personality characteristics can be very well described by means of four temperamental inborn dimensions that are regularly spread and they are genetically independent of each other. These dimensions reflect four cerebral systems. Every personality is a complex and gradual system according to Cloninger. This system consists of different psychobiological dimensions, temperament and character. Temperament and character can be measured and they enable to recognize differencies among people. Temperament consists of four hereditary orthogonal personality dimensions that can be observed since the early childhood and that include preconceptual and unpurposed teaching. Subhuman animals have these dimensions too. They have a special denotation – novelty seeking (NS), harm avoidance (HA), reward dependence (RD) and persistence (PE). Every personality farther consists of three character dimensions that are only partly influenced by temperament. Character is formed in the process of ontogenesis and it is influenced by teaching. The character dimensions are denoted as self-directedness (SD), cooperativeness (CO) and self-transcendence (ST). The TCI questionnaire that has 240 items and that is called the Temperament and Character Inventory (in the Czech Republic Kozeny et al., 1989) has contributed to propagation of Cloninger`s ideas. This questionnaire had its former version in the Czech republic that was called TPQ and it was translated and validated by Kozeny and Tisanska in
routine psychological exploration in this group of conscripts to find out their competence for the military service and their readiness to manipulate arms. The investigation was done in the beginning of the basic military service or in its course. The group was farther reduced to the persons that had reached at least IQ 90 in Otis intelligence test. The sample was then reduced to N=543. We eliminated the persons that had scored less that IQ 90 from the group in order to increase the probability of the adequate understanding of the individual items in the questionnaire. We used three different groups of people of different age for the percentile standards. The first group that consists of 543 people / N = 543 / has been already described in the previous sentences. The second group is a non - psychiatric group. It consists of 34 women and 91 men / N = 125 /. The people in this group are in the age between 22 and 68 yrs. / M = 45, SD = 11 /. They underwent the psychological check - up in the Psychological Department of the Central Military Hospital in Prague. This check-up was carried out within the frame work of the safety tests. Clonninger’s questionnaire /TCI/ has been administered as one of possible methods. The third group is the oldest. It consists of the patients that suffer from the disorders of the mobile corporal system /the Parkinson disease and the essential tremor/. There are 60 men and 31 women in this group / N = 91 / and their age is between 48 and 76 years / M = 58, SD = 6/. This group was examined in the Neurological Clinic of the Central Military Hospital in Prague. This examination was carried out in the framework of the diploma work about temperament of the patients that suffer from the Parkinson disease. Cloninger’s questionnaire /TCI/ was administered in combination with an interview.
The method
We used the questionnaire called the Temperament and Character Inventory /TCI/ Cloninger et. al.,1946 b/ that had been translated by Kozeny with the modification of two items in the translation. We have omitted Cloninger’s validatory scales that are not used by Cloninger today. We have joined the modified scale of lies from the Eysenck’s theory EPQIR where we had reformed the interrogative items to the informative items. The form of the TCI questionnaire stays the same. It consists of 238 items and each proband decides whether the particular item is valid for him or not. The method was administered on computer that had a written instruction.
Each proband had to evaluate different ways of behaviour and perception and state if the particular way of behaviour and perception is regular, normal or extreme. We have evaluated each personality disorder on the basis of the dimension of self
Cloninger defines and describes these dimensions like this:
Novelty seeking - NS, the behavioral system of activation
The hereditary basis of activation or initiation of behaviour /for example an explorational activity and a reaction to a new stimulus/. This is an inborn tendency to an intensive excitement as a response to new instigations. A high score means excitability, explorativity, curiosity, impulsivity, intolerance to monotony while a low score means indifference, reserve, systematization, thoughtfullness and a slow pace. The studies prove that novelty seeking is independent of mood and anxiety and that it positively correlates with aggressivity, impulsivity, criminality, the second type of alcoholism and extroversion. Alcoholics often have high novelty seeking/NS/ and low harm avoidance /HA/. High novelty seeking /NS/ in the childhood combined with low harm avoidance /HA/ and reward dependence /RD/ predicts antisocial behaviour of adolescents, alcoholic and drug addiction as well as criminality in the adult age.
Harm avoidance – HA, the behavioral system of inhibition
Results and discussion
Basic items in individual dimensions are shown in the charter. There are stated all basic dimensions except persistence /PE/ that was omitted because of its small clinical importance. On the other hand, we left the dimension of cooperativeness for a clinical use and also the dimension of self-transcendence because of important differencies between the Czech and the American population.
The number of probands that tend to personality disorder is 73 (13,95% of the group), the number of probands that suffer from the personality disorder is 36 (6,88%). The change of the structure of the temperamental types with intensifying personality disorder is obvious. We may observe the growth of the schizoid temperamental variant in cases of persons with personality disorder. The decrease of the schizoid and cyclothymic temperamental variant patients that tend to personality disorder is very difficult to interpret. The similar trend was found out by Casey and Joyce (1999) and the explanation could be in lower correlation of self-directedness with these temperamental types. If we consider the patients that tend personality disorder we may say that the passively aggressive, explosive and schizoid temperamental type was the most frequent distribution. The explosive and schizoid temperamental type was the most usual in the category of the patients, that suffer from personality disorder. The percentual distribution of personality disorders approximates members in general population (according to Smolík, 1996).
The standards for the temperamental types
We used three different groups from different time for the percentile standards. We have already described the first group (N = 543) in the pervious sentences. The second, non- psychiatric group consists of 34 women and 91 men (N = 125). The age of the patients in this group is between 22 and 68 years (M = 45, SD = 11). The third group is the oldest. It consists of the patients who suffer from the disorders of the mobile corporal system (the Parkinson disease and the essential tremor). There are 60 men and 31 women (N = 91) in this group and their age is between 48 and 76 years (M = 58, SD = 6). The percentile standards are depicted in comparison with the Americans of the same age (according to Cloninger, 1994a, page 89). In those two groups there is lower distribution of novelty seeking and much lower distribution
if self-transcendence. On the other hand, there is much higher distribution of reward dependence and self-directedness. The last group of the neurological patients has much lower distribution with the American group. On the other, distribution of harm-avoidance is higher than in the American group. A decrease in novelty seeking and a partial growth of the self-directedness and cooperativeness is more typical for Czech groups in the process of ontogeny. We haven’t examined the differences in sex because of the absence of women in the first group (N = 532). Cloninger (1994a) gives the standard scores for TCI for both sex together. He states higher distribution of cooperativeness by women. Brandstrom et al. (1998) has not found any relevant differences in sexes in the group of 1330 persons. The procedure for practical diagnostic of personality disorders is depicted in the chart. We understand a temperamental type in practice as a general tendency to behave in a specific way. As for the quality it also depends on the difference of individual divergences of the temperamental dimension from the average of the groups. The size of these divergences is very important for the interpretation of the finding. From the clinical point of view we must also consider many other important indicators - the scale of cooperativeness expressed by the dimension of cooperativeness (CO) can be a very important indicator how to predict success of psychotherapy, self-transcendence is related to psychosis and to the problem of perception of reality (Bayon et al., 1996). For the scale of validity of results it is also necessary to take into account the scores of lies. In this case we consider data that are higher than 7 points of the raw score as an irrelevant finding. Intelligence is also very important because individual items in TCI have a very difficult structure sometimes. It’s not necessary that a proband with lower intelligence understands these items well.
The process of diagnostics of personality disorders according to TCI: