



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Questions with correct answers for exam.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Answer A Issue: This issue here is whether the baker and the owner of the café formed a valid contract, including whether they had any defense, whether the statute of frauds aplplies, and whether promisee really accepted. Rule: The Restatement provides: An Agreement is a manifestation of mutual assent on the pad of two or more persons. A bargain is an agreement toexchange promises or to exchange a promise for a performance or to exchange performances.... Except as stated in Subsection (2), the formation of a contract requires a bargain in which there is a manifestation of mutual assent to the exchange and a consideration.... Manifestation of mutual assent to an exchange requires that each party either make a promise or begin or render a performance.... The manifestation of mutual assent to an exchange ordinarily takes the form of an offer or proposal by one party followed by an acceptance by the other party or parties. Therefore, to be valid, a contract must include a valid offer, a valid acceptance, and consideration. An offer is valid if it clearly expresses a promise or the offeror undertakes a performance that can be seen as an offer and a valid offer must contain the terms of the promise and those terms must be definite and certain. Also, the offer must be comunicated to the offeree.Assuming there is an offer, the next requirement is that the offer be accepted. To accept an offer validly, the offeree must manifest asset to the offer’s terms, in the way prescribed by the offer. Another way to put the rule for offer and acceptance is that there must be a “meeting of the minds” between the parties. Next, a valid contract must be supported by consideration. As the Restatement quote above points out, consideration is “The manifestation of mutual assent to an exchange ordinarily takes the form of an offer or proposal by one party followed by an acceptance by the other party or parties.” More rules that are important include: contracts are not valid is they are formed under duress, which is when one party “improperly threatens the other party in a way that leaves the victim no reasonable alternative than to agree to the contract. Other defenses to contract formation include fraud or lack of capacity. finally, a very important consideration that must be addressed is whether the Statute of Frauds applies. The SF applies to contracts that are for the buying of property, or are related to debts, or in contemplation of marriage, or are for contracts that can be comlpeted within a year. If the SF applies, then the contract must be in writing and signed by the party making the promise. The writing must include the essential terms of the agreement, including the identity of the party who charged and a description of the contract’s subject matter.Also, remember that acceptance is valid on dispatch while rejection is valid on receipt, which is the mail box rule. But its important to know that the mail box rule changes if the offer sends out both an acceptance and a rejection. In that case, whichever letter the offeror reads first is valid. Application: In this case, they probable have a valid contract. The mail box rule doesn’t apply because owner sent two letters. The baker got the acceptance letter first. It may be a problem that he didn’t read the letter before taking another job. He could argue that he didn’t accept the contract until reading the second letter, and he could win that argument. If he loses then they have a contract because the offeror’s letter passes the Statute of Frauds test. It puts the contract in writing and is signed by the Baker, so the SF is satisfied. If the owners response was actually a counterofficer than no valid offer because the counteroffer ended the offer and so there was no meeting of the minds every. Conclusion: Unless the baker can show that the owner’s acceptance letter wasn’t efective until he actually read it, the parties have a valid contract.
Preparation Gets the law wrong. (Under the relevant rule, it doesn’t matter when Baker read the acceptance, only when he received it.) Gets the law right. Analysis Regurgitates black letter law, including block quotes. Coping down long rules won’t earn points! Use the law, don’t just recite it. Uses the black letter law to analyze the facts; emphasizes the reasons for writer’s conclusions, using the facts Analysis Application section is underdeveloped. Application of law to facts should be most of your answer. If you highlight all sentences of application in B, you can see application is most of the answer. Writer uses facts with specificity. Analysis Misses some of the smaller issues. (Doesn’t address remedies or start by saying the common law, not U.C.C., applies to service contracts Sees and addresses all relevant issues. Gives small issues short treatment, but includes them. Organization Answer is one huge IRAC. IRAC should be used for single issues. Writer identifies the various legal issues presented by the facts and IRACs each one individually Organization Writer uses very long paragraphs so individual issues and points are hard to find. The only headings are organization headings for the parts of IRAC Writer uses short paragraphs and headings to flag issues, not the parts of IRAC. Writing Labels for parties are confusing and inconsistent Labels for parties are clear, easy to spot, consistent Writing Writing has many careless errors, and at least one potentially impacts the writer’s grade (can instead of can’t when referencing contracts that can’t be completed within a year. Bad impression hurts you. Writing is more polished. Most professors won’t focus on writing and will work to see what you understood, but clear writing maximize odds that what you know will get across