










Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A Framework for Planning and. Evaluation: PRECEDE-PROCEED. Evolution and Application of the Model. Lawrence W. Green. Judith M. Ottoson.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 18
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
PRECEDE-PROCEED Model
Green & Kreuter, Health Program Planning, 4th^ ed., NY, London: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
Some Challenges of Planning and
Evaluation in Public Health
food safety
water
shelter love
Another way to view the growing complexity of natural history (Adam), social history (Adam and Eve) and their increasingly complex world of health-related concerns with additional layers of relationships.
food safety
water
shelter love
communication approval
interpersonal skills
contraception
sexual health issues
food
safety
water
shelter love
communication approval
interpersonal skills
contraception
sexual health issues
infection control parenting skills health care
grief issues
food storage education
higher level communication and negotiation skills
mental health issues
food safety
water
shelter love
communication approval
interpersonal skills
contraception
Quality of life
Phase 1 Social assessment
Health
Phase 2 Epidemiological assessment
Health education
Policy regulation organization
Health Promotion
Phase 5 Administrative & policy assessment
Output Longer-term health outcome
Short-term social impact
Short-term impact
Input Process Long-term social impact
Phase 6 Implementation
Phase 7 Process evaluation
Phase 8 Impact evaluation
Phase 9 Outcome evaluation
Predisposing
Reinforcing
Enabling
Phase 4 Educational & ecological assessment
Behavior
Environment
Phase 3 Behavioral & environmental assessment
The Precede-Proceed model as it appeared in the previous Edition of the book, with phases 2 & 3 as separate phases, now combined.
Japanese
Quality of life
Phase 1 Social assessment
Health
Education- al strate- gies
Policy regulation organization
Health Program
Phase 4a
Phase 5 Implementation
Phase 6 Process evaluation
Phase 7 Impact & Outcome evaluation
Predisposing
Reinforcing
Enabling
Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment
Behavior
Environment
Phase 4bPhase 4b
Phase 2 Epidemiological Assessment
Genetics
Figure 1-2. The generic representation of the new version of PRECED-PROCEED, with new elements highlighted in blue. Phases 4-5 can be viewed as one or two phases, both covered in Chapter 5.
Administrative & policy assessment
Intervention Alignment
Quality of life
Phase 1 Social assessment
Health
Educational strategies
Policy regulation organization
Health Program
Phase 4a Intervention Alignment
Input Process Output Short-termimpact Longer-termhealth outcome Short-termsocial impact Long-termsocial impact
Phase 5 Implementation
Phase 6 Process evaluation
Phase 7 Impact and outcome evaluation
Predisposing
Reinforcing
Enabling
Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment
Behavior
Environment
Å Precede Evaluation tasks: Specifying
Phase 4b Administrative & Policy Assessment
Æ Proceed Evaluation Tasks: Monitoring & Continuous Quality Improvement
Phase 2 Epidemiological, Behavioral and Environmental Assessment
Genetics
Figure 1-5. Evaluation tasks begin at Phase 1, and continue through as many diagnostic, implementation, and follow-up evaluation phases as required.
Knowledge, Attitudes Beliefs Cultural Values Perceptions
Influence from parents, teachers, employers, peers, etc.
EnablingEnabling Availability of resources Accessibility Skills
Health Education,Health Education, Mass Media,Mass Media, Advocacy,Advocacy, TrainingTraining
Policy, Regulation,Policy, Regulation, OrganizationOrganization
Phase 3: Educational and Ecological Assessment
Phase 4: Intervention Alignment, Administrative And Policy Assessment
Knowledge, Attitudes Beliefs Cultural Values Perceptions
Influence from parents, teachers, employers, peers, etc.
EnablingEnabling Availability of resources Accessibility Skills
HealthHealth Education,Education, Media AdvocacyMedia Advocacy
Policy, Regulation,Policy, Regulation, OrganizationOrganization
Phase 3: Educational and Ecological Assessment
Phase 4: Intervention Alignment, Administrative And Policy Assessment
tivesObjec-
NO
Yes
Select & apply procedures for community participation (Ch 2)
Collect/Analyze data, get consensus, set priorities (Chap 2)
Are health objectives clear?
Go to Chap 3
If Not
Are behavioral & environmental causes, objectives clear?
Go to part 2 of Chap 3
Are Predisposing, Enabling, and Reinforcing factors clear? If Not Go to Chap 4
Are best practices & resources for program available, & policies in place? If Not
Go to Chap 5
If Not
Quality of life
Phase 1 Social assessment
Health
Educational strategies
Policy regulation organization
Health Program
Phase 4a Intervention Alignment
Input Process Output Short-termimpact Longer-termhealth outcome Short-termsocial impact Long-termsocial impact
Phase 5 Implementation
Phase 6 Process evaluation
Phase 7 Impact and outcome evaluation
Predisposing
Reinforcing
Enabling
Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment
Behavior
Environment
Å Precede Evaluation tasks: Specifying
Phase 4b Administrative & Policy Assessment
Æ Proceed Evaluation Tasks: Monitoring & Continuous Quality Improvement
Phase 2 Epidemiological, Behavioral and Environmental Assessment
Genetics
Figure 1-5. Evaluation tasks begin at Phase 1, and continue through as many diagnostic, implementation, and follow-up evaluation phases as required.
Feasibility Standards
The feasibility standards are intended to ensures that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal
Propriety Standards
Accuracy Standards
Quality of life
Phase 1 Social assessment
Health
Educational strategies
Policy regulation organization
Health Program
Phase 4a Intervention Alignment
Input Process Output Short-termimpact Longer-termhealth outcome Short-termsocial impact Long-termsocial impact
Phase 5 Implementation
Phase 6 Process evaluation
Phase 7 Impact and outcome evaluation
Predisposing
Reinforcing
Enabling
Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment
Behavior
Environment
Å Precede Evaluation tasks: Specifying
Phase 4b Administrative & Policy Assessment
Æ Proceed Evaluation Tasks: Monitoring & Continuous Quality Improvement
Phase 2 Epidemiological, Behavioral and Environmental Assessment
Genetics
Figure 1-5. Evaluation tasks begin at Phase 1, and continue through as many diagnostic, implementation, and follow-up evaluation phases as required.