Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

PRECEDE-PROCEED Model, Study notes of Communication

A Framework for Planning and. Evaluation: PRECEDE-PROCEED. Evolution and Application of the Model. Lawrence W. Green. Judith M. Ottoson.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

kavinsky
kavinsky 🇺🇸

4.4

(28)

286 documents

1 / 18

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
A Framework for Planning and
Evaluation: PRECEDE-PROCEED
Evolution and Application of the Model
Lawrence W. Green
Judith M. Ottoson
10es ans journees de sante publique
Montreal, Quebec
October 25, 2006
PRECEDE-PROCEED Model
Predisposing,
Reinforcing, &
Enabling
Constructs in
Educational/Ecological
Diagnosis &
Evaluation
Policy,
Regulatory &
Organizational
Constructs in
Educational &
Environmental
Development
Green & Kreuter, Health Program Planning, 4th ed., NY, London: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
Cette présentation a été effectuée le 25 octobre 2006, au cours du Symposium "La Charte d'Ottawa
pour la promotion de la santé est-elle toujours utile pour la pratique de la santé publique
d'aujourd'hui ?" dans le cadre des Journées annuelles de santé publique (JASP) 2006. L'ensemble
des présentations est disponible sur le site Web des JASP, à l'adresse http://www.inspq.qc.ca/jasp.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12

Partial preview of the text

Download PRECEDE-PROCEED Model and more Study notes Communication in PDF only on Docsity!

A Framework for Planning and

Evaluation: PRECEDE-PROCEED

Evolution and Application of the Model

Lawrence W. Green

Judith M. Ottoson

10 es^ ans journees de sante publique

Montreal, Quebec

October 25, 2006

PRECEDE-PROCEED Model

  • P redisposing,
  • R einforcing, &
  • E nabling
  • C onstructs in
  • E ducational/Ecological
  • D iagnosis &
  • E valuation
    • P olicy,
    • R egulatory &
    • O rganizational
    • C onstructs in
    • E ducational &
    • E nvironmental
    • D evelopment

Green & Kreuter, Health Program Planning, 4th^ ed., NY, London: McGraw-Hill, 2005.

Some Challenges of Planning and

Evaluation in Public Health

  • Health behavior is driven by more than knowledge,

beliefs, and attitudes (motivation)

  • Must be enabled, as well as predisposed
  • Health behavior usually must be sustained over long

periods to achieve health benefits

  • Must be reinforced, as well as enabled
  • Communications must be supported by policies and

programs, regulations and organization

  • Must adapt programs to different populations and

settings, with sensitivity to their differences.

  • In summary: the challenges require more than merely

imparting information, knowledge, or even wisdom…

“Eat fewer calories than your body burns.”

ADAM

food safety

water

shelter love

& EVE

Another way to view the growing complexity of natural history (Adam), social history (Adam and Eve) and their increasingly complex world of health-related concerns with additional layers of relationships.

ADAM

food safety

water

shelter love

& EVE

communication approval

interpersonal skills

contraception

sexual health issues

ADAM

food

safety

water

shelter love

& EVE

communication approval

interpersonal skills

contraception

& FAMILY

sexual health issues

infection control parenting skills health care

grief issues

food storage education

higher level communication and negotiation skills

mental health issues

ADAM

food safety

water

shelter love

& EVE

communication approval

interpersonal skills

contraception

& FAMILY

Quality of life

Phase 1 Social assessment

Health

Phase 2 Epidemiological assessment

Health education

Policy regulation organization

Health Promotion

Phase 5 Administrative & policy assessment

Output Longer-term health outcome

Short-term social impact

Short-term impact

Input Process Long-term social impact

Phase 6 Implementation

Phase 7 Process evaluation

Phase 8 Impact evaluation

Phase 9 Outcome evaluation

Predisposing

Reinforcing

Enabling

Phase 4 Educational & ecological assessment

Behavior

Environment

Phase 3 Behavioral & environmental assessment

*Green & Kreuter, Health Promotion Planning , 3rd ed., Mayfield, 1999.

The Precede-Proceed model as it appeared in the previous Edition of the book, with phases 2 & 3 as separate phases, now combined.

Japanese

Quality of life

Phase 1 Social assessment

Health

Education- al strate- gies

Policy regulation organization

Health Program

Phase 4a

Phase 5 Implementation

Phase 6 Process evaluation

Phase 7 Impact & Outcome evaluation

Predisposing

Reinforcing

Enabling

Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment

Behavior

Environment

Phase 4bPhase 4b

Phase 2 Epidemiological Assessment

Genetics

Figure 1-2. The generic representation of the new version of PRECED-PROCEED, with new elements highlighted in blue. Phases 4-5 can be viewed as one or two phases, both covered in Chapter 5.

Administrative & policy assessment

Intervention Alignment

Quality of life

Phase 1 Social assessment

Health

Educational strategies

Policy regulation organization

Health Program

Phase 4a Intervention Alignment

Input Process Output Short-termimpact Longer-termhealth outcome Short-termsocial impact Long-termsocial impact

Phase 5 Implementation

Phase 6 Process evaluation

Phase 7 Impact and outcome evaluation

Predisposing

Reinforcing

Enabling

Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment

Behavior

Environment

Å Precede Evaluation tasks: Specifying

measurable objectives and baselines.

Phase 4b Administrative & Policy Assessment

Æ Proceed Evaluation Tasks: Monitoring & Continuous Quality Improvement

Phase 2 Epidemiological, Behavioral and Environmental Assessment

Genetics

Figure 1-5. Evaluation tasks begin at Phase 1, and continue through as many diagnostic, implementation, and follow-up evaluation phases as required.

Phases 3- Phases 3-4 of PRECEDE.4 of PRECEDE.

Predisposing

Knowledge, Attitudes Beliefs Cultural Values Perceptions

ReinforcingReinforcing

Influence from parents, teachers, employers, peers, etc.

EnablingEnabling Availability of resources Accessibility Skills

BehaviorBehavior

andand

LifestyleLifestyle

Health Education,Health Education, Mass Media,Mass Media, Advocacy,Advocacy, TrainingTraining

EnvironmentEnvironment

Policy, Regulation,Policy, Regulation, OrganizationOrganization

Ecosystem

Phase 3: Educational and Ecological Assessment

Phase 4: Intervention Alignment, Administrative And Policy Assessment

Genetics and
Human Biology

Hallmark: Participation

• Stakeholders

• Community as Center of Gravity

• Health as a Social Issue

• Social Capital or Community Capacity

• Transdisciplinary Collaboration

Hallmark: Flexible and Scaleable

• Global applications (e.g., Global

Eradication of Guinea Worm Disease)

• National applications to local (e.g.,

PATCH, ALA and ACS)

• Over 960 published applications in all

settings (see www.lgreen.net)

• Multiple health issues/concerns

• Tailored, individual approaches scalable

to population-based approaches

• Multiple points of intervention

Hallmark: Evidence-based

and Evaluable

• Start with Outcomes

• Continuous Assessment

• Measurable Objectives

• Ongoing Feedback/Learning System

• Minimizes “Unanticipated Effects”

Hallmark: A Platform for

“Best Practice”

• Evidence-based

• Acknowledges Indigenous Practitioner

Wisdom and Contextual Knowledge

• Tailors Strategies to Meet Unique

Needs, Assets, and Circumstances

• A Generalizable Process, Not a

Generalizable Plan!

Phases 3- Phases 3-4 of PRECEDE.4 of PRECEDE.

Predisposing

Knowledge, Attitudes Beliefs Cultural Values Perceptions

ReinforcingReinforcing

Influence from parents, teachers, employers, peers, etc.

EnablingEnabling Availability of resources Accessibility Skills

BehaviorBehavior

andand

LifestyleLifestyle

HealthHealth Education,Education, Media AdvocacyMedia Advocacy

EnvironmentEnvironment

Policy, Regulation,Policy, Regulation, OrganizationOrganization

Ecosystem

Phase 3: Educational and Ecological Assessment

Phase 4: Intervention Alignment, Administrative And Policy Assessment

Genetics and
Human Biology

Concerns, Aspirations Felt needs, Assets,

Setting Priorities

GoalsVision

Phase 1. Social &

Quality-of-Life

Assessments &

Situation Analysis

Phases 2-3. Epidemi-

ological, Educational

& Ecological

Assessments

causes, determinants^ For each goal, assess

feasibility of eachAsses importance,

Set priorities

tivesObjec-

Phase 4. Administrative

& Policy Assessment,

PROCEED to Action,

Formative evaluation^ For each objective, assess

dence for changeAssess theory, evi-resources, polices

Select methods,

Assign roles

Pretest Methods

TacticsStrategy

Implementation

Activate Timelines for
Training, Interventions

Evaluation…of methods…intermediate objectives…ultimate goals

Phase 5

Phase 6Æ Phase 7^ Phase 8

Figure 2-6. Summary of the Phases of PRECEDE-PROCEED

Social goals & objectives

Community engaged?

NO

Yes

Select & apply procedures for community participation (Ch 2)

Collect/Analyze data, get consensus, set priorities (Chap 2)

Are health objectives clear?

Go to Chap 3

If Not

Yes

Are behavioral & environmental causes, objectives clear?

Go to part 2 of Chap 3

Yes

Are Predisposing, Enabling, and Reinforcing factors clear? If Not Go to Chap 4

Yes

Are best practices & resources for program available, & policies in place? If Not

Go to Chap 5

If Not

Implementation & Evaluation

Yes

Plan

PROCEED

PRECEDE

Fig 2-7. Flow diagram in applying PRECEDE-PROCEED.

Quality of life

Phase 1 Social assessment

Health

Educational strategies

Policy regulation organization

Health Program

Phase 4a Intervention Alignment

Input Process Output Short-termimpact Longer-termhealth outcome Short-termsocial impact Long-termsocial impact

Phase 5 Implementation

Phase 6 Process evaluation

Phase 7 Impact and outcome evaluation

Predisposing

Reinforcing

Enabling

Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment

Behavior

Environment

Å Precede Evaluation tasks: Specifying

measurable objectives and baselines.

Phase 4b Administrative & Policy Assessment

Æ Proceed Evaluation Tasks: Monitoring & Continuous Quality Improvement

Phase 2 Epidemiological, Behavioral and Environmental Assessment

Genetics

Figure 1-5. Evaluation tasks begin at Phase 1, and continue through as many diagnostic, implementation, and follow-up evaluation phases as required.

Feasibility Standards

  • Practical procedures
  • Political viability
  • Cost effectiveness

The feasibility standards are intended to ensures that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal

Propriety Standards

  • Service orientation
  • Formal agreements
  • Rights of human subjects
  • Human interactions
  • Complete and fair assessment
  • Disclosure of findings
  • Conflict of interest
  • Fiscal responsibility
The propriety standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be
conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those
involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results

Accuracy Standards

  • Program documentation
  • Context analysis
  • Describe purposes and procedures
  • Defensible information sources
  • Valid information
  • Reliable information
  • Systematic information
  • Analysis of quantitative information
  • Analysis of qualitative information
  • Justified conclusions
  • Impartial reporting
  • Metaevaluation
The accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and
convey technically adequate information about the features that determine the
worth or merit of the program being evaluated.

Quality of life

Phase 1 Social assessment

Health

Educational strategies

Policy regulation organization

Health Program

Phase 4a Intervention Alignment

Input Process Output Short-termimpact Longer-termhealth outcome Short-termsocial impact Long-termsocial impact

Phase 5 Implementation

Phase 6 Process evaluation

Phase 7 Impact and outcome evaluation

Predisposing

Reinforcing

Enabling

Phase 3 Educational & ecological assessment

Behavior

Environment

Å Precede Evaluation tasks: Specifying

measurable objectives and baselines.

Phase 4b Administrative & Policy Assessment

Æ Proceed Evaluation Tasks: Monitoring & Continuous Quality Improvement

Phase 2 Epidemiological, Behavioral and Environmental Assessment

Genetics

Figure 1-5. Evaluation tasks begin at Phase 1, and continue through as many diagnostic, implementation, and follow-up evaluation phases as required.