



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
32 Unsolved Practice Problems.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
(a) I go swimming on Mondays. (b) In order to be able to go motorcycling on Sunday, the weather must be good. (c) Eat your vegetables or you can’t have dessert. (d) You can ride a bicycle only if you wear a helmet. (e) Polynomials are continuous functions. (f) A number n that is a multiple of 2 and also a multiple of 3 is a multiple of 6. (g) You can’t have any pudding unless you eat your meat. (h) The cardinality of a set is either finite or infinite.
(a) If I had $1,000,000, I’d buy you a fur coat. (b) If it is not raining and not windy, then I will go running or cycling. (c) A day that’s sunny and not too windy is a good day for walking on the waterfront. (d) If 11 pigeons live in 10 birdhouses, then there are two pigeons that live in the same birdhouse.
(e) If every domino covers a black square and a white square, then the number of black squares equals the number of white squares.
(a) It is possible for an implication and its contrapositive to have different truth values. (b) If the statement q is true, then, for any statement p, the statement p → q is true. (c) If s 1 → s 2 is a contradiction, then so is its contrapositive. (d) There are truth values for p and q such that p → q and q → p are both false. (e) (¬p ∨ q) ∧ ¬(¬p ∨ q) is a contradiction. (f) If the statement P is a contradiction, then, for any statement q, the statement P → q is a tautology. (g) If two statements are logically equivalent, then so are their negations.
(a) Render the two statements on the sign in symbols. Start with: Let a be the assertion “you can attack the city”, and carry on from there. (b) Argue that the two statements on the sign are not logically equivalent, contrary to what the author probably intended. Which is more restrictive on who can attack Tokyo? (c) Correct the second statement so that it is logically equivalent to the first one.
(a) Write the statements A and B in symbolic form and then show that they are logically equivalent.
(b) Explain why every statement has a representation using only the logical connective nand.
(a) If an argument is valid then it is possible the conclusion to be false when all premises are true. (b) If the premises can’t all be true, then the argument is valid. (c) If p ⇔ q and q ⇔ r, then p ⇔ r.
p ↔ q q → r r ∨ ¬s ¬s → q ∴ s
is invalid by providing a counterexample.
p → ¬q q ∨ r p ∨ u ¬r ∴ u
p ¬q ↔ ¬p ∴ q
p ∨ r p ∨ q ∴ q ∨ r
¬(¬p ∨ q) ¬z → ¬s (p ∧ ¬q) → s ¬z ∨ r ∴ r
If I watch football, then I don’t do mathematics If I do mathematics, then I watch hockey ∴ If I don’t watch hockey, then I watch football
If you are pregnant or have a heart condition, then you can not use the hot tub. You do not have a heart condition. You can use the hot tub. ∴ You are not pregnant.
(b) Establish the validity of the argument
u → r (r ∧ s) → (p ∨ t) q → (u ∧ s) ¬t q ∴ p