













Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An introduction to the assessment of risk, dangerousness, and recidivism in forensic psychology. It covers the objectives, assessment methods, tools, and settings for assessment, as well as ethical considerations and functions of forensic psychologists. The document also discusses risk assessment on an individual case under study and the laws related to it.
What you will learn
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 21
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Forensic Psychology in Civil and Criminal Legal Proceedings and Juvinile Crimes
Structure
4.0 Introduction
4.1 Objectives
4.2 Assessment
4.2.1 Testing and Assessment 4.2.2 Definition of Psychological Testing and Assessment 4.2.3 Tools of Assessment
4.3 Assessment in Different Settings
4.3.1 Educational Setting 4.3.2 Geriatric Settings 4.3.3 Counselling Setting 4.3.4 Clinical Psychology 4.3.5 Business and Military Settings 4.3.6 Governmental and Organisational Credentialing 4.3.7 Other Settings
4.4 Assessment in Forensic Psychology
4.5 Forensic Psychology Evaluation
4.6 Ethics in Forensic Psychology
4.7 Functions and Roles of Forensic Psychologists
4.8 Risk Assessment on an Individual Case Under Study and Law
4.9 Let Us Sum Up
4.10 Unit End Questions
4.11 Suggested Readings
In this unit we will be learning about psychological Assessment, the difference between testing and assessment, and defining both testing and assessment. We then deal with tools of assessment like various tests that would be used by forensic psychologists. The next area will be to discuss about assessment in different settings , such as the educational settings, geriatric, counselling, clinical, business, governmental and related settings. There will be detailed discussion on assessment in forensic psychology and how the evaluation is done in forensic psychology. An account of ethical issues related to forensic psychology will be put forth along with functions and roles of forensic psychologists. In this unit we will be dealing with risk assessment on individual cases regarding the dangerousness etc., and the laws related to the same.
After completing this unit, you will be able to:
Forensic Psychology: Police and the Law
All fields of human endeavour use measurement in some form, and each field has its own set of measuring tools and measuring units. If you’re recently engaged or thinking about becoming engaged, you may have learned about a unit of measure called the carat. If you’ve been shopping for a computer, you may have learned something about a unit of measurement called a byte. And if you’re in need of an air conditioner, you’ll no doubt want to know about the Btu (British thermal unit). Other units of measure you may or may not be familiar with include a mile, a nautical mile, miles per hour, and cycles per second. Professionals in the fields that employ these units know the potential uses, benefits, and limitations of such units in the measurements they make. So, too, users and potential users of psychological measurements need a working familiarity with the commonly used units of measure, the theoretical underpinnings of the enterprise, and the tools employed.
The roots of contemporary psychological testing and assessment can be found in early twentieth-century France. In 1905, Alfred Binet and a colleague published a test designed to help place Paris schoolchildren in appropriate classes. Binet’s test would have consequences well beyond the Paris school district. Within a decade, an English language version of Binet’s test was prepared for use in schools in the United States. When the United States declared war on Germany and entered World War I in 1917, the military needed a way to screen large numbers of recruits quickly for intellectual as well as emotional problems. Psychological testing provided this methodology. During World War II, the military would depend even more on psychological tests to screen recruits for service. Following the war, more and more tests purporting to measure an ever widening array of psychological variables were developed and used.
The world’s receptivity to Binet’s test in the early twentieth century spawned not only more tests but more test developers, more test publishers, more test users, and the emergence of what, logically enough, has become known as a testing industry. Testing was the term used to refer to everything from the administration of a test (as in “Testing in progress”) to the interpretation of a test score (“The testing indicated that.. .”). During World War I, the process of testing aptly described the group screening of thousands of military recruits. We suspect it was at that time that testing gained a powerful foothold in the vocabulary of
Forensic Psychology: Police and the Law
The test A test may be defined simply as a measuring device or procedure. When the word test is prefaced with a modifier, it refers to a device or procedure designed to measure a variable related to that modifier. Consider, for example, the term medical test, which refers to a device or procedure designed to measure some variable related to the practice of medicine (including a wide range of tools and procedures such as X-rays, blood tests, and testing of reflexes).
In a like manner, the term psychological test refers to a device or procedure designed to measure variables related to psychology (for example, intelligence, personality, aptitude, interests, attitudes, and values). And whereas a medical test might involve the analysis of a sample of blood, tissue, or the like, a psychological test almost always involves the analysis of a sample of behaviour.
The behaviour sample could range from responses to a pencil-and-paper questionnaire to oral responses to questions to performance of some task. The behaviour sample could be elicited by the stimulus of the test itself, or it could be naturally occurring behaviour (under observation).
Psychological tests and other tools of assessment may differ on a number of variables such as content, format, administration procedures, scoring and interpretation procedures, and technical quality.
The interview Another widely used tool in psychological assessment is the interview, a word that may conjure images of face-to-face talk. But the interview as a tool of psychological assessment involves more than talk. If the interview is conducted face to face, the interviewer probably notes nonverbal as well as verbal behaviour, such as the interviewee’s dress, manner, and eye contact. An interview may be conducted over the telephone, in which case the interviewer might make inferences about what is said as a function of changes in the interviewee’s voice quality. Interviews need not involve speech, as when they are conducted in sign language. Interviews may be conducted by means of electronic media, such as e- mail. In its broadest sense, then, we can define an interview as a method of gathering information through direct communication involving reciprocal exchange.
Interviews differ with regard to many variables, such as their purpose, their length, or other restrictions under which they are conducted, and the willingness of the interviewee to provide information candidly. Interviews may be used by psychologists and others in clinical, counseling, forensic, or neuropsychological settings to help make diagnostic or treatment decisions.
School psychologists and others in educational settings may use interviews to help make decisions about the appropriateness of various educational interventions or class placements. An interview may be used to help human resources professionals make more informed recommendations about the hiring, firing, and advancement of personnel. In some instances, the process takes the form of a panel interview, wherein more than one interviewer participates in the assessment of personnel.
Assessment of Risk, Dangerousness, Recidivism, Criminal Profile
The portfolio
In recent years, the popularity of portfolio (work sample) assessment in many fields, including education, has been rising. Some have argued, for example, that the best evaluation of a student’s writing skills can be accomplished not by the administration of a test but by asking the student to compile a selection of writing samples. From the perspective of education administrators, portfolio assessment also has distinct advantages in assessing the effectiveness of teachers. By examining teachers’ portfolios and seeing how teachers approach their coverage of various topics, educational evaluators have another tool to help anchor judgments to work samples.
Case history data
In a general sense, case history data refers to records, transcripts, and other accounts in written, pictorial, or other form, in any media, that preserve archival information, official and informal accounts, and other data and items relevant to an assessee. Case history data may include files or excerpts from files maintained at institutions and agencies such as schools, hospitals, employers, religious institutions, and criminal justice agencies. Other examples of case history data are letters and written correspondence; photos and family albums; newspaper and magazine clippings; and home videos, movies, and audiotapes. Work samples, artwork, doodlings, and accounts and pictures pertaining to interests and hobbies are yet other examples.
Behavioural observation
If you want to know how someone behaves in a particular situation, observe his or her behaviour in that situation. Such “down-home” wisdom underlies at least one approach to evaluation. Behavioural observation as it is employed by assessment professionals may be defined as monitoring the actions of others or oneself by visual or electronic means while recording quantitative and/or qualitative information regarding the actions.
Behavioural observation may be used in a variety of settings for a variety of assessment objectives. It may be used, for example, as a diagnostic aid in a clinical setting or as a means of data collection in basic research. Observations may be made in laboratory or otherwise structured settings. An example of this is a researcher’s observation of a child who is asked to perform some task as part of an experiment. Observation may also occur in the natural setting in which the behaviour would typically be elicited or expected to occur. This variety of behavioural observation is referred to as naturalistic observation.
Role-play tests
If you have ever enjoyed the television program Whose Line Is It Anyway, you may appreciate just how entertaining improvisation can be. Beyond entertainment, however, improvisational acting has a place in the context of psychological assessment. In this context, role play may be defined as acting an improvised or partially improvised part in a simulated situation. A role-play test is a tool of assessment wherein assessees are directed to act as if they were in a particular situation. Assessees may then be evaluated with regard to their expressed thoughts, behaviours, abilities, and other variables.
Assessment of Risk, Dangerousness, Recidivism, Criminal Profile
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
Forensic Psychology: Police and the Law 9)^ List the situations under which behavioural observations can be useful?
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
You know from your own experience that a diagnosis may be defined as a description or conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and opinion. Typically, this conclusion is reached through a process of distinguishing the nature of something and ruling out alternative conclusions. As its name implies, a diagnostic test is a tool of assessment used to help narrow down and identify areas of deficit to be targeted for intervention. Diagnostic tests of reading, mathematics, and other academic subjects may be administered in educational settings by teachers, school counselors, and school psychologists to assess the need for educational interventions as well as eligibility for special education programs.
Schoolchildren receive grades on their report cards that are not based on any formal assessment. For example, the grade next to “Works and plays well with others” is probably based more on the teacher’s informal evaluation in the classroom than on scores on any published measure of social interaction. We may define informal evaluation as a typically non systematic assessment that leads to the formation of an opinion or attitude.
Informal evaluation is, of course, not limited to educational settings; it is very much a part of everyday life.
Old individuals may live at home, in special housing designed for independent living, in housing designed for assisted living, or in long-term care facilities such as hospitals and hospices. Wherever older individuals reside, they may at some point require psychological assessment to evaluate cognitive, psychological, adaptive, or other functioning.
Assessment in a counselling context may occur in environments as diverse as schools, prisons, and government – or privately-owned institutions. Regardless of the particular tools used, the ultimate objective of many such assessments is the improvement of the assessee in terms of adjustment, productivity, quality of life, or some related variable. Measures of social and academic skills and measures of personality, interest, attitudes, and values are among the many types of tests that a counsellor might administer to a client. Because the test-taker is in many
Forensic Psychology: Police and the Law
Using tests, interviews, and other tools of assessment, psychologists who specialise in the marketing and sale of products are involved in taking the pulse of consumers— helping to predict the public’s receptivity to a new product, a new brand, or a new advertising or marketing campaign.
One of the many applications of measurement is in governmental licensing, certification, or general credentialing of professionals. Before they are legally entitled to practice medicine, physicians must pass an examination. Law school graduates cannot hold themselves out to the public as attorneys until they pass their state’s bar examination. Psychologists, too, must pass an examination entitling them to present themselves to the public with the title “psychologist.” Members of some professions have formed organisations with requirements for membership that go beyond those of licensing or certification requirements.
Psychologists specialising in certain areas may be evaluated for a diploma from the American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP) to recognise excellence in the practice of psychology. Another organisation, the American Board of Assessment Psychology (ABAP), awards its diploma on the basis of an examination to test users, test developers, and others who have distinguished themselves in the field of testing and assessment.
Many different kinds of measurement procedures find application in a wide variety of settings. For example, the courts rely on psychological test data and related expert testimony as one source of information to help answer important questions such as “Is this defendant competent to stand trial?” and “Did this defendant know right from wrong at the time the criminal act was committed?”
Tools of assessment can be found in use in research and practice in every specialty area within psychology. For example, consider health psychology, a specialty area that focuses on understanding the role of psychological variables in the onset, course, treatment, and prevention of illness, disease, and disability (Cohen, 1994).
Health psychologists are involved in teaching, research, or direct-service activities designed to promote good health. Individual interviews, surveys, and paper-and- pencil tests are some of the tools that may be employed to help assess a current state of affairs with regard to some disease or condition, gauge treatment progress, and evaluate outcome of intervention.
Of course, psychological testing and assessment is not confined to health psychology. It is very much a part of all specialty areas within psychology and education. Further, what constitutes a “test” may take many different forms. There you will find a very small sample of the tens of thousands of measurement methods that have been used in one situation or another. They are not presented here to illustrate the most typical kinds of assessment procedures, but rather to illustrate the diversity of measuring tools that have been created for varied uses. In short, if a need exists to measure a particular variable, a way to measure that variable will be devised.
Assessment of Risk, Dangerousness, Recidivism, Criminal Profile
The forensic assessment has to be in extreme detail and follow certain uniform rules and regulations. Not only the crime scene visited needs to be recorded in detail with the help of experts, there is also a need to review the relevant information and the related files in regard to a particular case. Both secondary and primary data have to be collected so as to deliver fair justice to the person concerned. For instance the information from secondary source to be obtained include:
Test that are used in Forensic Psychological Assessment:
A “Forensic Psychology Evaluation” involves more than a standard psychological evaluation. The forensic psychologist is trained in psychometry and so is an expert who has extensive experience in administering a wide range of psychological tests that aim to answer certain legal questions. Many of these evaluations are related to criminal Proceedings which include the following:
Assessment of Risk, Dangerousness, Recidivism, Criminal Profile
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
There has always been an agreement among the professionals on a need to have a set of ethical guidelines and code of conduct to regulate, educate and inspire the practitioners (Grisso, 2005; Committee on Ethical Guideline for Forensic Psychologists, 1991). Hess (2006) urges the forensic psychologist to assume an obligation to practice the profession in a way that serves the public and not merely the individual profession. Various authorities that regulate the field of forensic psychology have articulate principles, codes, guidelines and standards for the practitioners.
Forensic Psychology: Police and the Law
For example the APA has described five principle of practice including
There are a number of standards for practicing forensic psychologists, covered by most of the regulating bodies including the test suggested by the APA, briefly described below:
Responsibility: This reflects the need for service to be provided in a forthright, responsible manner, reflecting the high standards of the profession.
Competence: This stresses that the services should be provided only if the person has specialised education, knowledge, skills, and / or experience along the necessary cultural competence.
Relationship: This urges the need to focus on the well-being of the client and also stresses the importance of the informed consent by providing information on their rights, anticipated costs, etc.
Privacy and Confidentiality: This reminds that efforts should be made to maintain confidentiality of information that does not bear directly on their legal purpose of services provided.
Advertising and Public Statements: This reminds the profession to avoid false claims and of the need of claims to be modest without guaranteeing any outcome.
Methods and Materials: This recommends accepted clinical and scientific standards for scholarly / empirical investigation, need for active testing of plausible rival hypothesis, minimising reliance upon hearsay, and exercising extreme caution in preparing reports or other documentation, applying such details and quality to the documentation so that the standards is higher than that for a general clinical practice.
Research Methodology and Publication: This cautions the professional of the ethics in using data that can go against those who gave consent for studies, ‘assistants’ interacting with clients in large scale studies and revelation of sensitive information while publishing.
Communications: This recommends every reasonable effort to be made to avoid any misunderstanding, misuse, or misinterpretation of services, evidence, and testimony, however, avoiding any out-of-court statements, considering the seriousness of the legal matters in hand.
Education and Training: This basically stresses the need for quality in terms of level of education and training required to handle delicate and sensitive issues like legal matters.
Forensic Psychology: Police and the Law
may also advocate foster for which these cases children who need a substitute family and presents their recommendations to the justice system in order to secure a safe and healthy environment for the children to proper and grow.
Assessment of victims of domestic violence In India and elsewhere most domestic violence that are reported, or come under the purview of the legal system, take the form of spousal abuse and may at times overlap with child abuse too. The Forensic Psychologist through many techniques and assessment tools is able to ascertain the extent of damage or harm caused mentally and physically to the victims and uses these findings as evidence in the court so that justice could be ensured to the victim.
Assessment in regard to child custody cases Forensic Psychologists are also called upon to assist in child custody cases. This often includes custody disputes which may arise when the divorcing parents are not able to agree on residential and parenting arrangements of their children or when one parent uses the issue as a wedge against and unfavourable divorce outcome. Custody disputes often involve determinations about visitations. Sometimes, the Forensic Psychologist evaluates a visitation dispute, rather than an argument over custody.
In certain cases, they may have involved in mediating if couples are motivated to be child-centered in their custody negotiations and both parents are able to trust and work with the mediator. Mediation has been heralded by some as an important alternative to the adversarial system of custody disputes.
Self Assessment Questions 3
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
Assessment of Risk, Dangerousness, Recidivism, Criminal Profile
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
Risk assessment is a dangerous tool in its infancy despite having been part of forensic and criminal psychology. Traditionally, recidivism has been the crucial topic. This is the likelihood that an offender will reoffend after release or some other stage in the future.
Assessment of Risk, Dangerousness, Recidivism, Criminal Profile
Experts in assessing client dangerousness should be employed in all.
All therapist should collect data on the risk demonstrated by their client pool as part of an effort to extend knowledge in the field.
Data on risk and dangerousness are potentially of value to the practitioners. Consequently it is incumbent on practitioners to communicate their findings to other practitioner’s decision makers working with potentially dangerous client populations.
Some authors stress the positive aspects of risk assessment (e.g. Glover, 1999). If risk had only negative outcomes (such as general public suffering violent assaults) then there would be no reason to take that risk. Just leave the offender behind bars which reduces the risk to the general public to the very minimum. It is because we want the positive benefits of taking the risk that we rake that risk. For example, we may feel it more humane to release prisoners into the community whenever possible or we may seek the economic benefit of not having to pay the high financial costs of keeping the offender in prison.
Self Assessment Questions 4
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
Forensic Psychology: Police
The decisions that are made by practitioners about the disposal of offenders may increase the chances of public becoming victims. Risk and dangerousness assessment is a technique developed to limit the levels of risk and danger while at the same time providing less restrictive arrangements for offenders.
This is not a precise science though empirical studies have demonstrated that certain variables predict future behaviours reasonably well. These include historical factors such as background of violent offending. Some psychological measures such as the psychopathy checklist are also effective.
Different types of offences require different predictor variables. So the predictors of sexual reoffending. The predictors of suicide may also be different.
The criteria stipulated that define recidivism may have a big influence on the likelihood of recidivism. Thus, for sex offenders, the likelihood of committing any type of crime may have much higher than committing a sexual crime.
Clinical approaches tend to be varied. These are methods that rely in part on the skills of the psychiatrist or psychologist. Generally, the clinical approach is regarded as ineffective. This seems to be more true of unstructured clinical work. There is evidence that structured guides to risk and dangerousness assessment may be very effective in some circumstances. Generally speaking, one should be little cautious concerning the criticism of the clinical method since there is good reason to think that some clinical variables ought to increase the accuracy of predictions. One should not confuse sloppy and bad practices with the best clinical work can do. It should be stressed that many clinicians do not see things this way
Mistakes are inevitable in predictions. It is harder to predict rare events than common events. The number of false positives and false negatives are important. False negatives are the offenders who are declared safe but actually reoffend. False positives are those who are declared a risk but do not offend. Prediction is easier for common events than uncommon events.