Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

QLLM385-Topic 7-A CONTINUUM OF ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Law

QLLM385-Topic 7-A CONTINUUM OF ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2023/2024

Available from 06/20/2024

topstudy
topstudy 🇺🇸

410 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
A CONTINUUM OF ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES
Arbitration
Private, parties get to choose the arbitrator. In the US insurance industry, an arbitration can argue for
the party that chose them, they are asked to disclose anything that might call into question their
impartiality.
Decisions are final and can’t be appealed. Recognition provided for under the NYC. Local law also
recognises international arbitration law.
Institutionalisation of arbitration has made it slower, meaning delays and excessive costs for parties.
Emergency arbitration used in times of emergency. Decision will stand until tribunal is formed.
Decision made by the EA is not final/binding.
Med-arb
Same person acts as mediator and arbitrator in the same dispute.
Decision-makers are not supposed to have private communication with either party without the other.
But this happens during the mediation phase so before entering arbitration phase, mediator discloses
all info said in private or mediator states he won’t rely on anything shared privately. Third possibility
is that parties waive their right to complain should the arbitrator use the private info.
If parties know info will be shared later, they may not disclose. This system may make mediation less
effective because of risks involved. This is not safe if you want to enforce arbitral award.
Window for settlement given before arbitration starts. Arbitrators also give framework of process to
parties.
Expert determination
Parties to a contract have particular dispute on a specific issue within the contract. Dispute is referred
to an expert in the area for determination e.g. price adjustment.
Parties need to be clear on expert’s remit. Expert’s determination is binding and depends on which
law governs the contract.
Early neutral evaluation
Evaluation of a party’s case. The evaluator does this on the basis of the material presented on the
possible outcome of the case. It doesn’t bind parties but advises on strength of their case.
Helps promote settlement depending on outcome of evaluation. It may lead to settlement or entrench
party’s views even further.
Adjudication
Similar to expert determination. Popular in construction projects that need quick decision to continue
project.
Decision is interim, and parties can challenge it later or through other processes. But decisions are
rarely re-litigated because parties accept them.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download QLLM385-Topic 7-A CONTINUUM OF ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Law in PDF only on Docsity!

A CONTINUUM OF ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

Arbitration Private, parties get to choose the arbitrator. In the US insurance industry, an arbitration can argue for the party that chose them, they are asked to disclose anything that might call into question their impartiality. Decisions are final and can’t be appealed. Recognition provided for under the NYC. Local law also recognises international arbitration law. Institutionalisation of arbitration has made it slower, meaning delays and excessive costs for parties. Emergency arbitration used in times of emergency. Decision will stand until tribunal is formed. Decision made by the EA is not final/binding. Med-arb Same person acts as mediator and arbitrator in the same dispute. Decision-makers are not supposed to have private communication with either party without the other. But this happens during the mediation phase so before entering arbitration phase, mediator discloses all info said in private or mediator states he won’t rely on anything shared privately. Third possibility is that parties waive their right to complain should the arbitrator use the private info. If parties know info will be shared later, they may not disclose. This system may make mediation less effective because of risks involved. This is not safe if you want to enforce arbitral award. Window for settlement given before arbitration starts. Arbitrators also give framework of process to parties. Expert determination Parties to a contract have particular dispute on a specific issue within the contract. Dispute is referred to an expert in the area for determination e.g. price adjustment. Parties need to be clear on expert’s remit. Expert’s determination is binding and depends on which law governs the contract. Early neutral evaluation Evaluation of a party’s case. The evaluator does this on the basis of the material presented on the possible outcome of the case. It doesn’t bind parties but advises on strength of their case. Helps promote settlement depending on outcome of evaluation. It may lead to settlement or entrench party’s views even further. Adjudication Similar to expert determination. Popular in construction projects that need quick decision to continue project. Decision is interim, and parties can challenge it later or through other processes. But decisions are rarely re-litigated because parties accept them.

Dispute boards Common in construction contracts. A group of people are put in place at the start of the project and given regular updates as project continues. Issues are referred to board for quick resolution. Board can negotiate/mediate/give a recommendation which is binding unless challenged within a certain period of time. Hi-lo arbitration Technique used to try and encourage settlement in arbitration. Used for pay disputes in baseball. Before arbitrator makes a decision on pay, parties enter their demands. Arbitrator chooses demand that is close to his determination. This therefore forces parties to be reasonable in their demands. Quotes Simon Roberts & Michael Palmer, Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Dispute Resolution (2005)  Annexation of mediation raises issues of consent, choice of mediator, remuneration and court accountability of process.  Fuller – mediation + arbitration are different in purpose and morality. Mediation morality=optimum settlement, arbitration morality=contract to enter arbitration. Mediator wants to ensure position of parties are met so outcome almost meets interests. Arbitration enables parties to present arguments for and against proof. Private consultation not good for med-arb due to keeping an open mind + integrity of adjudication. Arbitrator should also do justice according to rules imposed by parties’ contract. Arbitration enables us man to enjoy powers of judge without accepting restraints.  Newman – med-arb sometimes difficult to assess when mediation should give way to arbitration. Arbitrator who is well acquainted with facts better than new neutral. Knowing mediator will become arbitrator could prevent parties from sharing info.  Elliot – private caucus: causes questions of bias in minds of parties. Arbitration: parties each have turn to speak. Mediation: parties speak freely. Hard for mediator turned arbitrator to put facts from caucus away when tendering award.  Galanter – move towards mediation helps courts save resources, increase autonomy of parties, minimises enforcement problems, induces feelings of control. Klaus Peter Berger, “Integration of Mediation Elements into Arbitration ‘Hybrid’ Procedures and ‘Intuitive’ Mediation by International Arbitrators” (2003)  Arbitration has always been regarded as being flexible but increased judicialization of the process is making it harder.