Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

RAC Device Practice Question Set 13, Quizzes of International Law

RAC Device Practice Question Set 13- US

Typology: Quizzes

2024/2025

Uploaded on 04/07/2025

sandeep-srivastava-5
sandeep-srivastava-5 🇮🇳

13 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Question
Answer
Explanation
A community-based organization wants to conduct a
survey to understand the health needs of a specific
population. The survey involves collecting anonymous,
non-identifiable information about health behaviors.
According to 21 CFR Part 56, does this type of activity
typically require IRB review?
a) Yes, all research involving human subjects under FDA
jurisdiction requires full IRB review.
b) Yes, but it may qualify for expedited review if it poses
minimal risk.
c) No, research involving anonymous surveys generally
falls outside the purview of IRB review.
d) It depends on the funding source of the survey; federal
funding always requires IRB review.
c) No, research involving anonymous surveys
generally falls outside the purview of IRB
review.
During an IDE study for a new surgical laser, a participant
experiences an unexpected serious adverse event that was not
explicitly listed in the original informed consent form. What is
the investigator's responsibility regarding informed consent in
this situation, according to FDA regulations?
a) To continue the study as planned, as the patient has already
provided consent.
b) To report the adverse event to the sponsor and IRB but not
necessarily re-consent the subject.
c) To promptly inform the subject (or their legally authorized
representative) about the new risk and revise the informed
consent form, seeking re-consent if the subject wishes to
continue participation.
d) To only inform future participants about the new risk during
the consent process.
c) To promptly inform the subject (or their legally
authorized representative) about the n ew risk and
revise the informed consent form, seeking re-
consent if the subject wishes to contin ue
participation.
A subject participating in an IDE study for a new diagnostic
device experiences a temporary cognitive impairment due t o a
pre-existing medical condition. The investigator n eeds to
perform a study-related procedure. Can the investigator
proceed with the procedure based on the s ubject's initial
informed consent?
a) Yes, the initial consent remains valid u nless the subject
explicitly withdraws it.
b) Yes, as long as the investigator believes the procedu re is in
the subject's best interest.
c) No, the investigator should obtain consent from the su bject's
legally authorized representative if the subject lacks the
capacity to provide ongoing informed consent.
d) It depends on the specific terms outlin ed in the original
consent form regarding temporary incapacitation.
c) No, the investigator should obtain consent from
the subject's legally authorized representative if the
subject lacks the
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download RAC Device Practice Question Set 13 and more Quizzes International Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Question Answer Explanation A community-based organization wants to conduct a survey to understand the health needs of a specific population. The survey involves collecting anonymous, non-identifiable information about health behaviors. According to 21 CFR Part 56, does this type of activity typically require IRB review? a) Yes, all research involving human subjects under FDA jurisdiction requires full IRB review. b) Yes, but it may qualify for expedited review if it poses minimal risk. c) No, research involving anonymous surveys generally falls outside the purview of IRB review. d) It depends on the funding source of the survey; federal funding always requires IRB review. c) No, research involving anonymous surveys generally falls outside the purview of IRB review. During an IDE study for a new surgical laser, a participant experiences an unexpected serious adverse event that was not explicitly listed in the original informed consent form. What is the investigator's responsibility regarding informed consent in this situation, according to FDA regulations? a) To continue the study as planned, as the patient has already provided consent. b) To report the adverse event to the sponsor and IRB but not necessarily re-consent the subject. c) To promptly inform the subject (or their legally authorized representative) about the new risk and revise the informed consent form, seeking re-consent if the subject wishes to continue participation. d) To only inform future participants about the new risk during the consent process. c) To promptly inform the subject (or their legally authorized representative) about the new risk and revise the informed consent form, seeking re- consent if the subject wishes to continue participation. A subject participating in an IDE study for a new diagnostic device experiences a temporary cognitive impairment due to a pre-existing medical condition. The investigator needs to perform a study-related procedure. Can the investigator proceed with the procedure based on the subject's initial informed consent? a) Yes, the initial consent remains valid unless the subject explicitly withdraws it. b) Yes, as long as the investigator believes the procedure is in the subject's best interest. c) No, the investigator should obtain consent from the subject's legally authorized representative if the subject lacks the capacity to provide ongoing informed consent. d) It depends on the specific terms outlined in the original consent form regarding temporary incapacitation. c) No, the investigator should obtain consent from the subject's legally authorized representative if the subject lacks the

A pharmaceutical company has received a "Refusal to File" letter from the FDA for their NDA. Which type of formal meeting would be most appropriate for the company to request to discuss the reasons for the refusal and determine the necessary steps to resubmit the application? a) Type B Meeting b) Type C Meeting c) Type A Meeting d) Pre-NDA Meeting c) Type A Meeting A drug development company has completed its Phase 2 clinical trials and has promising efficacy and safety data. They want to discuss their Phase 2 results and gain FDA alignment on the design of their pivotal Phase 3 trials before proceeding. Which type of formal meeting should they request? a) Pre-IND Meeting b) End-of-Phase 1 Meeting c) End-of-Phase 2 Meeting (a Type B Meeting) d) Type C Meeting c) End-of-Phase 2 Meeting (a Type B Meeting) A sponsor is preparing to submit their NDA to the FDA. They have a few specific questions regarding the format of certain data tables and the presentation of their integrated safety summary. Which type of formal meeting would be most suitable to address these detailed, pre-submission inquiries? a) Type A Meeting b) End-of-Phase 2 Meeting c) Pre-NDA Meeting (a Type B Meeting) d) Type C Meeting c) Pre-NDA Meeting (a Type B Meeting) A biotech startup is in the very early stages of developing a novel therapeutic. Before conducting their first-in-human study, they want to discuss their preclinical data package and overall clinical development plan with the FDA. Which type of formal meeting should they request? a) Pre-NDA Meeting b) End-of-Phase 2 Meeting c) Pre-IND Meeting (a Type B Meeting) d) Type A Meeting c) Pre-IND Meeting (a Type B Meeting) During ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials, a sponsor identifies a significant and unexpected safety signal that requires immediate discussion with the FDA to determine the best course of action. Which type of formal meeting should they request? a) Type B Meeting b) Type C Meeting c) Type A Meeting d) End-of-Phase 2 Meeting c) Type A Meeting