Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

RAC Device Practice Question Set 7, Quizzes of International Law

RAC Device Practice Question Set 7- US

Typology: Quizzes

2024/2025

Uploaded on 04/07/2025

sandeep-srivastava-5
sandeep-srivastava-5 🇮🇳

13 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Question
Answer
Explanation
Company F is preparing a 510(k) submission for a device
that will be sold as part of a system with other devices.
Which of the following is TRUE regarding their
submission?
a) They must submit separate 510(k)s for each component
of the system
b) They can only submit a single 510(k) if all components
are novel devices
c) They may submit a single 510(k) for the entire system
if it's intended to be used as such
d) System submissions are not allowed under the 51 0(k)
process
c) They may submit a single 510(k) for the entire
system if it's intended to be used as such
A manufacturer receives a Warning Letter from the
FDA following an inspection. Which of the following
is the MOST appropriate initial response?
a) Submit a corrective action plan within 15 business
days
b) Immediately stop distribution of all products until
the issue is resolved
c) Conduct an internal audit and report back to FDA
within 60 days
d) Request an informal dispute resolution meeting
before responding
a) Submit a corrective action plan within 15
business days
A medical device manufacturer is planning to modify
an FDA-cleared Class II device by changing the
material of a key component. What is the MOST
appropriate regulatory path for this change?
a) Submit a new 510(k) if the change affects safety
or effectiveness
b) File a Special 510(k) since it is a minor
modification
c) Submit a De Novo request because the material
change makes it a novel device
d) Make the change under a Letter-to-File with
internal documentation
a) Submit a new 510(k) if the change affects
safety or effectiveness
RAC Book page 147.
Explanation:
Material changes may impact biocompatibility,
safety, or effectiveness, requiring a new 510(k). A
Special 510(k) is only appropriate when
modifications do not require additional testing to
demonstrate safety or effectiveness.
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download RAC Device Practice Question Set 7 and more Quizzes International Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Question Answer Explanation Company F is preparing a 510(k) submission for a device that will be sold as part of a system with other devices. Which of the following is TRUE regarding their submission? a) They must submit separate 510(k)s for each component of the system b) They can only submit a single 510(k) if all components are novel devices c) They may submit a single 510(k) for the entire system if it's intended to be used as such d) System submissions are not allowed under the 510(k) process c) They may submit a single 510(k) for the entire system if it's intended to be used as such A manufacturer receives a Warning Letter from the FDA following an inspection. Which of the following is the MOST appropriate initial response? a) Submit a corrective action plan within 15 business days b) Immediately stop distribution of all products until the issue is resolved c) Conduct an internal audit and report back to FDA within 60 days d) Request an informal dispute resolution meeting before responding a) Submit a corrective action plan within 15 business days A medical device manufacturer is planning to modify an FDA-cleared Class II device by changing the material of a key component. What is the MOST appropriate regulatory path for this change? a) Submit a new 510(k) if the change affects safety or effectiveness b) File a Special 510(k) since it is a minor modification c) Submit a De Novo request because the material change makes it a novel device d) Make the change under a Letter-to-File with internal documentation a) Submit a new 510(k) if the change affects safety or effectiveness RAC Book page 147. Explanation: Material changes may impact biocompatibility, safety, or effectiveness, requiring a new 510(k). A Special 510(k) is only appropriate when modifications do not require additional testing to demonstrate safety or effectiveness.

When must an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) be obtained for a clinical trial in the U.S.? a) When studying a significant risk device b) When conducting any clinical investigation of a medical device c) When evaluating minor labeling changes for an already approved device d) When testing a device outside of the U.S. before bringing it to market in the U.S. a) When studying a significant risk device Explanation: An IDE is required for significant risk (SR) devices before clinical trials in the U.S. Non-significant risk (NSR) devices may proceed under IRB approval without an IDE. Under FDA regulations, which of the following situations would classify a device as misbranded? a) The device label omits the established name of the device b) The device is commercially distributed without FDA clearance or approval c) The device lacks adequate directions for use d) All of the above d) All of the above What are the two forms in which the device labeler must provide the Unique Device Identifier (UDI) on labels and packages? A) Text and QR code B) Linear barcode and 2D matrix barcode C) UDI in plain text and a machine-readable format D) RFID tag and holographic sticker C) UDI in plain text and a machine-readable format RAC Book page 525. If a device failure is occurring with greater than expected frequency and investigation of the problem implicates improper use by the end user, which of the following should occur?

  1. The labeling is revised
  2. The product is recalled
  3. The product is redesigned
  4. A "Dear Doctor" letter is issued A) Only 1 B) Only 2 C) Only 3 D) Only 4 A) Only 1