Download Religion and Science: Complementary Perspectives and more Papers English Language in PDF only on Docsity!
Katherine Palacios Dr. Oguine Engl-1201 ZGE Research Paper December 6, 2004 Religion and Science Are Complementary It is important to acknowledge, recognize, and examine the different viewpoints on whether religion is influenced by science or vice versa. One of the many questions that come to mind is, Are science and religion complementary, if not which one outweighs the other and why? In order to answer this, one must understand the scientific and religious perspectives of life and acknowledge the differences in their functions. Two authors that shape my views on religion vs. science are Stephen L. Carter in “The Culture of Disbelief” and C.S. Lewis in “The Rival Conceptions of God.” In “The Culture of Disbelief,” Carter claims that religion is very important to people, but our laws and politics are trying to drive us away from religion (467). Lewis, in “The Culture of Disbelief,” explains how religion has given human beings the meaning of the creation of universe, while eliminating the scientific perspective. I have come to conclude from the essays and other research sources that science and religion are both equally important to society, that neither acts independently and that both are complementary using the Big Bang Theory and Evolution to symbolize the Biblical creation myth; both seek a better world. Though we live in diverse world where different religions are practiced, one of the most popular ones is Christianity. In C.S. Lewis’s “The Rival Conceptions of God,”
he acknowledges that Christianity is one of the religions that differ from others and that the majority of Christians believe in one God, who is their savior and creator. He asserts, “The first big division of humanity is into the majority, who believe in some kind of God or gods, and the minority who do not” (476). Lewis also explains the Pantheistic belief that God created the universe and if he did not exist, neither would the universe. Lewis states, “Anything you find in the universe is part of God” (477). One can see that Lewis is a strict believer that God is the one who made the world, and that “Christianity is a fighting religion…God made the world- that space and time, heat and cold, and all the colours and tastes, and all the animals and vegetables” (477). Even though, I agree with Lewis, I also acknowledge science and its role in the universe; something Lewis does not. Consequently, in Stephen L. Carter’s “The Culture of Disbelief,” he states that American ideology values religion. He also states, “Nine out of ten Americans believe in God and some four out five pray regularly” (467). This indicates that almost the entire population does believe in a Creator, that there is no doubt religion plays a big role in society. Carter also explains that politicians tend to be on the side of science, while the majority of Americans are on the side of religion. He states, “More and more, our culture seems to take the position that believing deeply in the tenets of one’s faith represents a kind of mystical irrationality, something that thoughtful, public-spirited American citizens would do better to avoid” (469). It is as though our culture is discriminating, belittling, and undermining the importance of religion, but the last Presidential election, in which morality seemed to be the determining factor, proved it wrong. First, one cannot argue the clear distinction between science and religion. Scientists gain and create their knowledge through the use of their senses. Anything that
not exist and they based their empirical data on theories. Evolutionists explain, “We cannot see the Creator, we cannot hear the Creator, and we cannot touch or smell the Creator. Therefore, we are unable to test for the Creator with any form of scientific equipment developed thus far” (“Evolution-vs.-creation” 2). Conversely, religion believes that God was the creator for all living things. What an evolutionist does not understand is just because one cannot see or feel, does not mean it’s not there. Although evolutionists have made great scientific discoveries, as far as discovering the stellar- evolution, chemical-evolution, and the planetary-evolution, they lack knowledge that religion is as rational as science. Nevertheless, science and religion bring together a world of religious beliefs and scientific advancements. Through science, human beings strive to learn more of the mysteries of creation, while religion seeks to know the Creator. Science investigates the physical world through experiments, while religion attempts to explain the unexplainable. Wernher von Braun reports, “When science gets to the end of its rope, let faith take over the account for the unexplainable” (37). It is as though God operates through the laws of nature, while science through the laws of science, but together science and religion bring numerous positive results; science in medicine and technology, and religion in saving our souls, and checking the excesses of science, such as cloning. Therefore, there will always be people who believe in faith, like in “New Superstitions for Old” by Margaret Mead. Just because superstition cannot be scientifically proven, it does not mean it’s not there. Mead claims, “They help people pass between the areas of life where what happens has to be accepted without proof, and
the areas where sequences of events are explicable in terms of cause and effect, based on knowledge” (433). In conclusion, both science and religion strive to save our lives. Science saves our lives with its discoveries in medicine and religion our faith in God. Even though they arrive at different conclusions, “having their own culture, process and procedures for verifying truth,” both work toward the same goal, and without religion, we would be condemning people to death. Astronomer Carl Sagan puts it best about science and religion that each is in its “own sphere, and they're in fact mutually supportive” (Neese 70).” Science had improved and shaped many lives, just as religion has helped many souls. Undoubtedly, both are two independent forces that are mutually powerful.
