Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Problem Set #3 Hints for Phys 3810, Spring 2009, Assignments of Quantum Mechanics

Hints for problem set #3 in the phys 3810 course offered in spring 2009. The hints cover various problems from griffiths' textbook, including derivations, integrals, and matrix calculations. Students are advised to go through the finite-well derivation, use integration by parts, and consider the action of an operator on states.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/30/2009

koofers-user-cki
koofers-user-cki 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Phys 3810, Spring 2009
Problem Set #3, Hint-o-licious Hints
1. Griffiths,2.29 Actually, this one isn’t so bad. You just need to go through the finite–well
derivation in the book and make the appropriate changes for the asymmetric state.
The main results you should get to are the results of applying the boundary conditions:
κ=`cot(`a)
and, using the same definitions of zand z0, the new condition for finding the energies
(graphically, perhaps)
cot(z) = q(z0/z)21
which is not guaranteed to have a root since the right side is positive and the left side starts
off being negative for small z.
2. Griffiths,3.7
3. Griffiths,3.12 Some steps: Start with
hxi=Z
−∞
Ψ(x, t)xΨ(x, t)dx
and substitute (3.55),
Ψ(x, t) = 1
2π¯hZ
−∞
eipx/¯hΦ(p, t)dp
Watch for complex conjugates and be sure that the dummy variable of pintegration is
different in the two integrals. When you do this you have a big integral over three variables:
x,pand p0.
Do what Griffiths says, use
xeipx/¯h=¯h
i
d
dpeipx/¯h
and then do an integration by parts. Be careful with with variable names to know what the
derivatives are acting on.
Use (and review) the result of problem 2.26,
Z
−∞
dx eiqx = 2πδ(q)
Use this for one of the integrations, but as usual be careful with the variables.
The next integration collapses the delta function and gives the desired result.
4. Griffiths,3.23 As discussed in class, from considering the action of this Hon the state
|1iand |2i, one can show that
H= E E
EE!
With all of the 2’s flying around, the normalization is a little funky.
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Problem Set #3 Hints for Phys 3810, Spring 2009 and more Assignments Quantum Mechanics in PDF only on Docsity!

Phys 3810, Spring 2009 Problem Set #3, Hint-o-licious Hints

  1. Griffiths, 2.29 Actually, this one isn’t so bad. You just need to go through the finite–well derivation in the book and make the appropriate changes for the asymmetric state. The main results you should get to are the results of applying the boundary conditions:

−κ = cot(a)

and, using the same definitions of z and z 0 , the new condition for finding the energies (graphically, perhaps)

− cot(z) =

√ (z 0 /z)^2 − 1

which is not guaranteed to have a root since the right side is positive and the left side starts off being negative for small z.

  1. Griffiths, 3.
  2. Griffiths, 3.12 Some steps: Start with

〈x〉 =

∫ (^) ∞ −∞

Ψ(x, t)∗xΨ(x, t) dx

and substitute (3.55),

Ψ(x, t) = √^1 2 πh¯

∫ (^) ∞ −∞

eipx/¯hΦ(p, t) dp

Watch for complex conjugates and be sure that the dummy variable of p integration is different in the two integrals. When you do this you have a big integral over three variables: x, p and p′. Do what Griffiths says, use xeipx/¯h^ =

h¯ i

d dp

eipx/¯h

and then do an integration by parts. Be careful with with variable names to know what the derivatives are acting on. Use (and review) the result of problem 2.26, ∫ (^) ∞

−∞

dx eiqx^ = 2πδ(q)

Use this for one of the integrations, but as usual be careful with the variables. The next integration collapses the delta function and gives the desired result.

  1. Griffiths, 3.23 As discussed in class, from considering the action of this H on the state | 1 〉 and | 2 〉, one can show that

H =

( E E E −E

)

With all of the

2’s flying around, the normalization is a little funky.

1

  1. Griffiths, 3.27 The first measurement puts the system in state ψ 1. Now the probabilities for measuring b 1 and b 2 can be read off from the coefficients (squared). The B measurement was made, but you are not told the result of the measurement. Now when A is measured again, you are not assured of getting a 1 and that is because the B measurement —whatever its outcome— has changed the state of the system. Write the φ’s in terms of the ψ’s and then consider that if the B measurement had given b 1 what the probability of a 1 would be. Then consider that if the B measurement had given b 2 what the probability of a 1 would be. Combine all the probabilities together. The answer to the question is 337625 but show how you get it! I had to stop and think for a while why the answer is not 1. But the fact that the measurement of B was made does have a physical effect even if we don’t know the result of that measurement. (The answer does employ the fact that we don’t know what it was.)
  2. Griffiths, 3.31 You’ll need to evaluate

[H, xp] =

[ p^2 2 m

, xp

]

  • [V (x), xp]

The first of these is (^) [ p^2 2 m

, xp

] = − 2 i¯h

p^2 2 m

and the second is

[V (x), xp] = −

¯h i

x

dV dx

  1. Griffiths, 3.37 Get the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of H. (They are c and a ± b, and some simple vectors with 1’s and −1’s. Show all of this!) Part (c) has the system start in a state which is not an eigenstate, so you must decompose it in terms of eigenstates (can be done “by inspection”) and then attach the usual oscillatory time dependence with the energy eigenvalues.