









Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Information on the responses of Golgi tendon organs (GTOs) to contraction of muscle fibres inserting directly into the receptor (GTO-muscle fibres) and to electrical current pulses applied extracellularly. The study examines the threshold force, sensitivity, and impulse initiation sites in the sensory terminal. The document also discusses the interaction between responses to muscle contraction and electrical stimulation.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 15
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
J. Physiol. (1981), 318, pp. 429-443 429 With 7 text-figures Printed in Great (^) Britain
From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Washington University School of
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
METHOD Preparation Cats were anaesthetized by i.P.^ injection of^ pentobarbitone^ (30^ mg/kg).^ Immediately^ following transaction of the^ skinned^ tail^ from the^ rest^ of the^ body,^ the^ dorsolateral^ tendon^ was^ retracted laterally to^ expose muscles^ to^ the^ bathing^ solution^ (composition^ in^ mM:^ NaCl^ 145, KCl 1-5,^ CaCl 1-8, MgSo4 1 0, KH2PO4^ 1-0,^ HEPES buffer^ 5-0, glucose^ 5-0,^ pH^ adjusted^ to^ 7-4^ at^ room temperature). Under^ a^ dissecting^ microscope^ single^ tendon^ organs^ at^ the^ musculotendinous^ junction can be identified. A part of the muscle containing a^ Golgi tendon^ organ^ and its nerve was^ dissected out (^) together with a piece of the tail bone from which^ the^ muscle^ originates;^ the^ preparation^ was transferred to another small chamber where^ further dissection and^ experiments^ were^ performed. Using fine^ needles and scissors,^ a^ single^ GTO^ together^ with its^ nerve^ was^ first^ isolated^ from^ the surrounding connective tissue and tendon. Isolation of muscle^ fibres^ inserting^ directly^ to^ the receptor (GTO-muscle^ fibres)^ then^ proceeded^ from the tendon^ side^ toward^ their^ origin.^ The^ bathing solution was changed several times during the^ course^ of this dissection. After^ isolation,^ the^ piece of tail bone was firmly fixed by magnet-based pins to^ the bottom of the^ chamber, the end of^ the tendon tied to a strain gauge (sensitivity 0-5^ 1V/mg,^ compliance^20 4m/g,^ resonant^ frequency 800 Hz, drift+ 1-5 ,uV/hr) mounted^ on^ a^ micromanipulator,^ and the^ nerve^ lifted into oil^ for recording impulse activity using a^ pair of Pt^ wire^ electrodes. Another^ pair^ of Pt wire^ electrodes was placed on GTO-muscle fibres^ for^ stimulation. Stimulation and^ recording To stimulate GTO-muscle^ fibres,^1 msec^ electrical^ pulses^ of^ various^ intensities^ were^ applied directly to^ the^ muscle^ fibres^ through^ a^ pair^ of^ stimulating^ wire electrodes^ which,^ in order to^ reduce stimulus artifacts in^ nerve^ records,^ were^ placed^ away^ from^ the receptor,^ usually^ near^ the muscle origin. The^ technique^ employed^ for^ electrical^ stimulation of the^ sensory^ ending^ was^ similar^ to^ that
Tension (mg) 0-12rC
0-08 1-
004 -
0' -^ I^ I^ I^ I^ I 40 80 120 Time (msec) Fig. 1. Impulse discharge from an isolated GTO-muscle preparation in (^) response to various levels of tetanic contraction of GTO-muscle fibres. A, three examples of single trace records where upper traces represent impulses and lower traces tension. Each impulse is marked by a dot. Other spikes are stimulus artifacts. The intensity of muscle stimulation at 32 Hz increased from top to bottom. Time calibration, 0 5 sec. Tension calibration, 100 mg. B, the relation of plateau tension vs. discharge rate. Crosses were obtained at a just taut muscle length (- 10 mm, Al =^ 0), open circles at 3 mm longer length (Al =^3 mm), and filled circles at 5 mm longer muscle length (Al =^5 mm) at which a sustained spontaneous discharge occurred. Correlation coefficient by rank (^) (rs), 1-0 for crosses, 0-975 (P [two-tail t test] < 0-001) for open circles, and^ 0-886 (P < 0-001) for filled circles. A regression line calculated for each (^) group of data within (^90) mg or less tension is also (^) shown. The (^) slope of these lines (sensitivity) is 240 i.p.s./g for the continuous line (correlation coefficient, r = (^) 0974), 250 i.p.s./g for the dashed line (r = (^0) 987), and 147 i.p.s./g for the dotted line (r =^ 0982). C, plot of coefficient of variation (C.V.) against mean intervals estimated by measuring 5-12 interimpulse intervals in single trace records at various plateau tension. Al =^3 mm.^ rs =^0 90, P^ <^ 0-001.
A
I I tj1 (^) _~~~~
B
50
0
1 60 msec
Iiiiii
nmv-~~~~~
decreased progressively from 281P6 to 160 i.p.s./g at 1-3 10 and 100 i.p.s./g at 1-5 l0.
mg
200 L 100 o (^) S (i.p.s./g)
100 Nu- , (^100)
0 I aftI 0 I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 l (mm) Fig. 2.^ Sensitivity and threshold^ active^ force^ for^ initiation of^ an^ impulse as a^ function^ of muscle (^) length. 0, x, maximum tetanic tension and passive tension, respectively (left
length (= 10 mm).
impulse was^ measured^ during^ the^ rising^ phase^ of^ a^ twitch^ contraction^ at^ the time when an impulse was initiated. In^ the^ GTO-muscle preparation shown^ in^ Fig. 2 the threshold (^) (U) remained (^) relatively constant over the muscle lengths examined. The
(active + passive tension in^ mg)^ was^ 1-5^ +^ 3,^ 2-8 +^ 10,^ 11-3^ +^ 3,^ 20 +^ 2 and^ 8X0^ +^ 6. In order to examine whether the^ active^ tension^ developed by a^ single GTO-muscle
A
D
B
A_ ..4' I
F
-j
Fig. 3. Impulse discharge from a GTO in response to intracellular stimulation of (^) a single GTO-muscle fibre. Records A, B and C represent respectively (^) responses of a (^) GTO-muscle preparation to intracellular stimulation (^) of three different muscle fibres. In A, a muscle action potential shown in the bottom trace (^) (stimulus artifacts seen as downward and upward deflexion preceding the action potential) caused a twitch contraction (middle trace) and an impulse discharge from the organ (top trace). In (^) B, the first (^) stimulation of a second fibre failed to initiate any response whereas the second stimulus produced a (^) twitch (bottom trace) and an impulse (top trace). In C, the first twitch contraction initiated an impulse but the second one failed to do so. In B and C intracellular records were omitted. Resting potential -65 mV for all three fibres. Records D and E represent records taken from two out of three impaled fibres of another GTO-muscle preparation. In D, the intracellular (^) electrode following a muscle action potential got out of the cell (bottom trace) causing muscle^ contracture (middle trace) and a train of impulse discharge from the organ. Note that the same stimulating current when applied extracellularly caused no response at all. Inset record in E shows the muscle action potential at a faster time base (time calibration, 10 msec). Resting potential -80 mV (^) for both fibres. In record F, in response to suprathreshold stimulation of a muscle fibre, two muscle (^) action potentials (middle trace) and two nerve impulses from the organ (top trace) were (^) initiated for each trial without any noticeable tension development (bottom trace). Four (^) single trace records were superimposed. Resting potential -70 mV. Time calibration (^) in C (250 msec) applies to B, (^) C, D and E. (^) Tension calibration in C, 5 mg for A, B, C and E and 10 mg for D. Volt- age calibration in D for intracellular recordings, 100 mV for A and E and 50 mV for D. Time calibration (^) in A and F, 10 msec. Vertical bar in F, 50 mV for intracellular recording and 5 mg for tension.
E
M_._.A- (^) --- (^) 0-1111-1-MO
I
435
I
A
8 ....^.. ..-. ......... ....- 4 -
0
L 0 20
D
40 Time (sec)
60
(^008) [-
d 0041
L 101
I (^) I I I I I l0 120 140 160 Time (msec) Fig. 4. Impulse discharge from an isolated Golgi tendon organ in response to a constant current applied through the innervating axon. As shown in the upper record in A impulse discharge continued^ throughout the^ entire^ period (- 80 see) of^ current^ application (lower trace in A). Time and current calibration in A, 30 see and 10-7 A, respectively. In B the mean discharge rate determined by counting the number of impulses during consecutive 1-5 see periods is^ plotted on^ the^ same^ time^ scale^ as^ in A.^ C, mean interimpulse intervals of ten consecutive (^) impulse intervals measured (^) up to (^60) see from the start of current application. D, scatter plot of coefficient of variation (^) (C.V.) of ten consecutive (^) interimpulse intervals against mean impulse intervals (^) during the same (^) period as in C. Correlation coefficient by rank, (^) r. =^ 0-64, P (two-tail t (^) test) < 0-01.
8
160 C
EE 140k E (^120) -
100 _ *
0
been reported for (^) many other sensory receptors including frog muscle spindles (Buller,
(rs =^ 0.81,^ P^ <^0 01).^ As^ discussed^ by^ Brokensha &^ Westbury^ (1974),^ ifthe relationship
were different for each impulse generator, then the lack of any abrupt change in this
Interaction between responses to muscle contraction and to electrical stimulation
is involved, depending upon the distance between the impulse initiation site and the
contraction simply added to the response to electrical stimulation. Example records
A
A (^) +8B
Li LLLL
4*4 - - - I. -- -. ... .............
Fig. 6. Sample records illustrating the response to applied current (A), the response to tetanic stimulation at 25/sec of GTO-muscle fibres (B) and the response to combined stimulation (A + B) of an isolated GTO-muscle preparation. Upper trace^ in^ each^ record represents axonal discharge. Time calibration, 0-5 sec.^ Vertical calibration^ bar, 9 x^ 10-8^ A for current and 50 mg for tension. Each^ impulse in B^ is^ marked^ by a^ dot.^ Other^ spikes in B and smaller spikes in^ the^ upper trace^ in^ A^ + B^ are^ stimulus^ artifacts.
0011- -
1 L 1 L L 1.
I
-[-fl-
GTO-muscle fibre constitutes an equally potent input to the receptor, depending only upon the^ amount^ of^ active^ force^ developed; a^ tendon^ organ responds simply to^ the total force exerted upon it. This discrepancy seems to^ be due^ largely, if^ not^ entirely, to the differences in (^) experimental conditions. For (^) instance, a part of the results by Gregory & Proske (1979) could be explained, at least qualitatively, by assuming an unloading effect^ exerted^ by non^ GTO-muscle^ fibre^ contraction^ of^ single motor^ units (Houk & Henneman, 1967; Stuart, Mosher, Gerlach &^ Reinking, 1972). If^ only one or two muscle fibres of a single GTO-activating motor unit inserted directly into^ the organ (Houk et^ al. 1971), the^ larger the^ motor^ unit^ the^ more^ powerful the^ expected unloading effect. Smaller motor units might exert^ little^ such^ effect.^ Thus, when the largest motor^ unit is^ stimulated^ first, which^ would^ presumably produce a^ relatively
units in order of (^) increasing potency would result in a (^) progressively steeper tension vs. response relation. On the other hand, the^ reverse^ order of^ recruitment^ would produce a^ relation^ showing a^ steep rising^ foot^ followed^ by^ a^ progressively^ less^ steep curve (Fig. 3 of Gregory & Proske, 1979). Similarly, when^ the^ firing rate^ evoked^ by each of a number of motor units of similar size differs by a relatively small^ amount, an approximately linear relation^ is^ expected between^ firing rate^ and^ tension,
The dynamic response of^ GTOs^ where^ myelinated terminal branches^ also^ occur (Barker, 1974) is generally much less than that of^ spindle primary endings, being comparable to^ that of the^ secondary ending. Based^ on^ the^ analysis^ of^ receptor potentials and impulse discharge from^ single GTOs^ in vitro it^ has been^ suggested that it is not (^) necessary to postulate functionally distinct multiple impulse initiation sites to account for the dynamic response (Fukami &^ Wilkinson, 1977). The present analysis of responses to tetanic contraction of GTO-muscle fibres, to electrical current pulses and^ to^ combined^ stimulation^ suggests that^ the^ impulse discharge seen in the parent axon originates from a^ single impulse initiation^ site^ in
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BNS77-21801) and from the Muscular Dystrophy Association (Jerry Lewis Muscular Research Center, Washington University). The^ author^ is^ grateful to^ Drs C. C.^ Hunt,^ D. Purves and R. S. Wilkinson for^ reading the manuscript.
REFERENCES BARKER, D. (1967). The innervation of^ skeletal^ muscle.^ In^ Myotatic,^ Kinesthetic^ and^ Vestibular Mechanisms, ed.^ DE^ REUCK, A. V.^ S. Boston: Little Brown. BARKER, D. (1974). The^ morphology of muscle^ receptors.^ In^ Handbook^ of Sensory^ Physiology,^ ed. HUNT, C. C., vol.^ III/2. Berlin:^ Springer-Verlag. BINDER, M. D., KROIN, J. S., MOORE, G. P. & STUART, D. G. (1977). The response of Golgi tendon organs to^ single motor^ unit^ contractions. J.^ Physiol.^ 271,^ 337-349. BROKENSHA, G. & WESTBURY, D. R. (1974). Adaptation of the discharge of frog muscle spindles following a stretch. J. Physiol. 242, 383-403. BULLER, A. J. (1965). A model illustrating some aspects of muscle spindle physiology. J. Physiol. 179, 402-416. BULLER, A. J., NICHOLLS, J. G. & STROM, G. (1953). Spontaneous fluctuations of^ excitability in^ the muscle spindle of the frog. J. Physiol. 122, 409-418. CLIFFORD, P. & SUDBURY, A. (1972). The Markow property of impulse interaction^ in^ branching nerve fibres. Math. Biosci. 13, 195-203. EAGLES, J. P. & (^) PURPLE, R. L. (1974). Afferent fibres with^ multiple encoding sites. Brain^ Res.^ 77, 187-193. EDWARDS, C. (1955). Changes in the discharge from^ a^ muscle^ spindle produced by electrotonus^ in the sensory nerve. J. Physiol. 127, 636-640. Fox, J. M. (1976). Ultra-slow inactivation of^ the^ ionic^ currents^ through the membrane of myelinated nerve. Biochem. biophys. Acta^ 426, 232-244. FUKAMI, Y. (1970). Accommodation^ in^ afferent^ nerve^ terminals^ of snake muscle^ spindle. J. Neurophysiol. 33, 475-489.