

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A simple review guide for students of l2201, an introductory course in international relations (ir). The author emphasizes the importance of understanding major themes in ir and developing a concrete understanding of key concepts and theories. The guide suggests review activities to help students prepare for exams and deepen their understanding of ir.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
I prefer to use the term of a review guide rather than a guide for final exam. The reason is that we should not treat exams as the ultimate goal of studying. Rather, exams are just “means” or instruments that help us achieve the real “ends,” that is, a better understanding of international relations (IR) and global politics.^1 My purposes in this review guide, therefore, is to offer suggestions about how to review our ten-week lectures.
L2201 is an introductory course and IR is a complex subject. Therefore, it is simply impossible for us to cover every single topic in IR. Instead, we focus on five major themes of IR, that is,
These five themes represent the most important subfields of IR. They speak to different phenomena in IR and thus requires different sets of concepts and theories. Before diving into specific concepts and theories, it would be better if we can take several minutes and think about the differences across these themes, or, put it differently, why we need different concepts and theories under different themes.
Concepts are the building blocks of IR theories, and they are the first step of the “ simplification ” process (recall our 1st week lecture). Different theories require different conceptualizations (i.e., simplifications) of the same reality. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a concrete understanding of key concepts in different themes.
For example, in the theme of international security (more specifically, war), we introduced Waltz’s “ structural realism ,” which suggests the structural distribution of power (i.e., polarity ) is the key to our (^1) Some of you may find this is similar to Weber’s argument of instrumental vs. value rationality. Yes, it is.
understanding of stability in a given IR system. Waltz employs the concept of polarity to develop his parsimonious theory and generate predictions.
If concepts are simplifications (or, building blocks) of the reality, theories describe the relationship between concepts, that is, how building blocks are interconnected. For scientific research, we are particularly interested in the causal relationship, that is, X (democracy dyad, IV ) → Y (absence of war, DV ).
In the theme of international security (more specifically, peace), for example, we notice this law-like pattern, that is, democracies rarely fight against each other. Yet, we are unsure about the underlying mechanisms , that is, how exactly X leads to Y. This is why we discussed theories like Kantian Peace, Maoz and Russett’s theory, and, finally, the selectorate theory.
Provided with the previous sections, my suggestion for review activities follows,