Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Rhetorical Analysis Checklist , Summaries of Communication

Proofreading Checklist for a Rhetorical Analysis , Body Paragraphs .

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 01/21/2022

ekanaaa
ekanaaa 🇺🇸

4.3

(28)

268 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Rhetorical Analysis Checklist
Title MLA stipulates that all papers have titles. Your title should be telling of what your paper is about. It
should be professional and appropriate
Introduction
1. Hook?
2. Contextualize the article: discuss its exigence/social context; paint a quick picture of the cultural climate
into which this argument was introduced (date, place, the current state of technology in some cases).
3. Introduce author and article: mention article’s title and discuss briefly author’s background
4. Describe briefly article’s topic/ argument (very short summary)
5. Identify briefly author’s main claim(s) and make clear which claims are purpose and which are
secondary points.
6. Identify very briefly author’s intended audience(s)
7. State thesis: how relatively effective/ineffective do you find this argument for its intended audience,
listing briefly some of its greatest rhetorical choices and their effect. Your thesis will be similar to this.
Remember, your thesis must have the following:
a. Title and Author
b. Evaluation/ Claim/ Statement of Effectiveness
c. Audience
d. Purpose
e. 3 Rhetorical Choices (unless permission has been given)
f. Overall Effect on Audience
Body Paragraphs (3+)
1. Include a topic sentence identifying a clear rhetorical choice that supports the thesis. The topic sentence
should make a thoughtful statement about how the device is used.
2. Show the choice through quotes, summary, or paraphrase.
3. Focus on how the author writes the device and why it is effective or not effective. What effect does it
create? How does that effect influence the audience? How does the influence in the audience help the
author achieve purpose?
4. Provide sufficient and balanced support from the text, meaning find two or three excellent examples of
the rhetorical device. (See Chapter 13C in your e-handbook for information on adeptly incorporating
quotations and/or how to paraphrase.)
5. Include commentary on the choice explaining how and why the author uses the quote (discuss the
rhetorical choice in conjunction with purpose and audience).
6. Finish with a sentence that wraps up the point of the paragraph and/or transitions to the next one.
7. Reread each paragraph after you write it to see if you need to include additional information (evidence,
topic sentence, explanations) or if you should eliminate anything (opinions, summary, excessive quotes).
Conclusion
1. Mention text, writer, rhetorical strategies again.
2. Provide statement(s) about the effectiveness of the writer’s choices to accomplish the purpose for the
target audience.
3. Possibly include any further implications of the text in terms of rhetorical choices, purpose, and
audience.
a. That is, take the time to wrap up the interconnections between the choices. How do all three
work together to make the writing effective? Which ones build on each other?
Works Cited You must include a works cited reference. Undocumented work will not be accepted.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Rhetorical Analysis Checklist and more Summaries Communication in PDF only on Docsity!

Rhetorical Analysis Checklist

Title – MLA stipulates that all papers have titles. Your title should be telling of what your paper is about. It should be professional and appropriate

Introduction

  1. Hook?
  2. Contextualize the article: discuss its exigence/social context; paint a quick picture of the cultural climate into which this argument was introduced (date, place, the current state of technology in some cases).
  3. Introduce author and article: mention article’s title and discuss briefly author’s background
  4. Describe briefly article’s topic/ argument (very short summary)
  5. Identify briefly author’s main claim(s) and make clear which claims are purpose and which are secondary points.
  6. Identify very briefly author’s intended audience(s)
  7. State thesis: how relatively effective/ineffective do you find this argument for its intended audience, listing briefly some of its greatest rhetorical choices and their effect. Your thesis will be similar to this. Remember, your thesis must have the following: a. Title and Author b. Evaluation/ Claim/ Statement of Effectiveness c. Audience d. Purpose e. 3 Rhetorical Choices (unless permission has been given) f. Overall Effect on Audience

Body Paragraphs (3+)

  1. Include a topic sentence identifying a clear rhetorical choice that supports the thesis. The topic sentence should make a thoughtful statement about how the device is used.
  2. Show the choice through quotes, summary, or paraphrase.
  3. Focus on how the author writes the device and why it is effective or not effective. What effect does it create? How does that effect influence the audience? How does the influence in the audience help the author achieve purpose?
  4. Provide sufficient and balanced support from the text, meaning find two or three excellent examples of the rhetorical device. (See Chapter 13C in your e-handbook for information on adeptly incorporating quotations and/or how to paraphrase.)
  5. Include commentary on the choice explaining how and why the author uses the quote (discuss the rhetorical choice in conjunction with purpose and audience).
  6. Finish with a sentence that wraps up the point of the paragraph and/or transitions to the next one.
  7. Reread each paragraph after you write it to see if you need to include additional information (evidence, topic sentence, explanations) or if you should eliminate anything (opinions, summary, excessive quotes).

Conclusion

  1. Mention text, writer, rhetorical strategies again.
  2. Provide statement(s) about the effectiveness of the writer’s choices to accomplish the purpose for the target audience.
  3. Possibly include any further implications of the text in terms of rhetorical choices, purpose, and audience. a. That is, take the time to wrap up the interconnections between the choices. How do all three work together to make the writing effective? Which ones build on each other?

Works Cited – You must include a works cited reference. Undocumented work will not be accepted.

Proofreading Checklist for a Rhetorical Analysis

Introduction

  1. Is there a title?
  2. Is there an appropriate hook? (No hook is better than a bad hook)
  3. Is the primary text presented clearly?
  4. Do we get background information about the author?
  5. Does the writer briefly address article’s topic/ argument?
  6. What is the original context of the piece?
  7. Is audience and purpose presented clearly and correctly?
  8. Focused thesis? 9. Overall, from the introduction, would your reader be able to tell that the paper is a rhetorical analysis?

Body Paragraphs

  1. Is there a topic sentence that clearly presents the choice that the paragraph will examine the effectiveness of?
  2. Is there an example of the choice given through the use of quote, summary, or paraphrase?
  3. Did you state what effect this choice creates?
  4. Did you explain how that specific effect targets the author’s specific intended audience?
  5. Did you explain how this effect influenced the audience on a specific level?
  6. Did you explain how this new feeling the audience has can help the author achieve his overall purpose for writing?
  7. Do you have more than one example per choice?
  8. Do you explain each choice in depth ( at least 3 sentences) before showing another example?
  9. Did you provide an overall statement about what the examples show, how they work (together), and how they add to the author’s overall effectiveness?
  10. Do you transition smoothly from one choice to the next paragraph

Conclusion

  1. Do you represent your central argument?
  2. Has your thesis evolved in any way through the act of writing your analysis?
  3. Do you explain how you have effectively taken your readers down a path that shows the validity of your thesis?
  4. Do you explain how the rhetorical choices work together to make the author’s rhetoric effect and indeed do not stand alone?
  5. Do you explain how some of the choices work off of (or in conjunction to) each other?
  6. Do you have a works cited reference?

Overall

  1. Go through each sentence: a. Does each sentence focus on the rhetoric? If it focuses on the topic, it probably needs to go. b. Does each sentence support your thesis/ claim? c. Do you have any sentence fragments or incomplete thoughts? d. Do all of your sentences add to your rhetorical analysis in a meaningful way? e. Are there any sentences that you need to explain further by adding “because” or “by?” f. Did you cite throughout?
  2. Is your purpose clear and tone appropriate?
  3. Did you hit the minimum word count (not including works cited).