Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

SAME SEX MARRIAGE : points in favour and in opposition of the same, Summaries of Marriage and Family Psychology

same sex marriage SAME SEX MARRIAGE : points in favour and in opposition of the same

Typology: Summaries

2024/2025

Uploaded on 09/20/2024

ishita-agarwal-5
ishita-agarwal-5 🇮🇳

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
SAME SEX MARRIAGE
Same-sex marriages refer to marriages between two individuals of the same gender. In India,
same-sex marriages are not currently legal, although there are ongoing efforts to recognize
and legalize them.
Legalizing same-sex marriage would not only provide legal recognition and protection for
LGBTQ+ couples but also promote greater social acceptance and reduce discrimination
against the community.
The Indian legal system does not recognize same-sex marriages, and the country’s laws
define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Section 377 of the Indian Penal
Code, which criminalized homosexuality, was struck down by the Supreme Court of India in
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India in 2018, which was a major victory for LGBTQ+ rights in
the country. However, the decriminalization of homosexuality did not legalize same-sex
marriages.
Several legal cases have been filed in Indian courts seeking to legalize same-sex marriage,
but as of now, the courts have not yet granted legal recognition to same-sex couples. In
2017, the Delhi High Court declared that same-sex couples are entitled to be in a stable
relationship, but stopped short of legalizing same-sex marriage.
In 2019, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act was passed, which aimed to
protect the rights of transgender individuals and provide them with legal recognition.
FAVOUR-
Denying individuals the right to marry based on their sexual orientation is a violation
of their fundamental rights and freedoms.
legalizing it would promote equality and inclusivity in society as denial of same-sex
marriage perpetuates discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community
it is consistent with the principles of secularism and democracy, which India is
founded on as the Indian constitution guarantees equality and freedom to all
citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation
OPPONENTS
Marriage is a sacred institution that is defined as a union between a man and a
woman. They believe that changing the definition of marriage to include same-sex
couples would undermine traditional family values and the institution of marriage.
They argue that the primary purpose of marriage is to procreate and raise children,
and that same-sex couples cannot fulfil this purpose, thus making their union
fundamentally different from that of opposite-sex couples.
They argue that children need both a mother and a father to have a well-rounded
upbringing and that same-sex couples cannot provide this.
legalizing it would lead to a breakdown of social norms as it would pave the way for
other forms of unconventional relationships and would ultimately threaten the
country’s cultural and religious traditions
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download SAME SEX MARRIAGE : points in favour and in opposition of the same and more Summaries Marriage and Family Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

SAME SEX MARRIAGE

Same-sex marriages refer to marriages between two individuals of the same gender. In India, same-sex marriages are not currently legal, although there are ongoing efforts to recognize and legalize them. Legalizing same-sex marriage would not only provide legal recognition and protection for LGBTQ+ couples but also promote greater social acceptance and reduce discrimination against the community. The Indian legal system does not recognize same-sex marriages, and the country’s laws define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized homosexuality, was struck down by the Supreme Court of India in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India in 2018, which was a major victory for LGBTQ+ rights in the country. However, the decriminalization of homosexuality did not legalize same-sex marriages. Several legal cases have been filed in Indian courts seeking to legalize same-sex marriage, but as of now, the courts have not yet granted legal recognition to same-sex couples. In 2017, the Delhi High Court declared that same-sex couples are entitled to be in a stable relationship, but stopped short of legalizing same-sex marriage. In 2019, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act was passed, which aimed to protect the rights of transgender individuals and provide them with legal recognition. FAVOUR-  Denying individuals the right to marry based on their sexual orientation is a violation of their fundamental rights and freedoms.  legalizing it would promote equality and inclusivity in society as denial of same-sex marriage perpetuates discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community  it is consistent with the principles of secularism and democracy, which India is founded on as the Indian constitution guarantees equality and freedom to all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation OPPONENTS  Marriage is a sacred institution that is defined as a union between a man and a woman. They believe that changing the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples would undermine traditional family values and the institution of marriage.  They argue that the primary purpose of marriage is to procreate and raise children, and that same-sex couples cannot fulfil this purpose, thus making their union fundamentally different from that of opposite-sex couples.  They argue that children need both a mother and a father to have a well-rounded upbringing and that same-sex couples cannot provide this.  legalizing it would lead to a breakdown of social norms as it would pave the way for other forms of unconventional relationships and would ultimately threaten the country’s cultural and religious traditions

In Supriyo v. UOI, 2022, the SC rejected the plea for allowing same sex marriage by making a gender neutral interpretation of the SMA. The court held it cannot strike down the provisions of the Special Marriage Act (SMA) or read words differently. Majority held that there is no FR to marry and left it on the legislature to decide on the same. PERSONAL OPINION  SC has on earlier occasions drafted guidelines in areas where there existed a legislative void. Eg. Vishakha Guidelines- So, there could have been a diff approach than leaving it on the govt to form policy in this regard.  Should be legalized. We as humans have evolved and so have our relations. Today live relations have been accepted, rights of transgenders have been recognized and therefore, allowing them to marry a partner of their choice should not be hindered.  On a legislative aspect, a separate legislation can be formed in this regard to take care of all the rights that subsequently flow from the same like inheritance, adoption etc and the possible lacunas and drawbacks can be addressed well in advance through stringent laws.  Countries like Australia, South Africa, US , UK etc have also leglised the same and even our neighbouring country NEPAL has.