



















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An in-depth analysis of the free movement of goods in the EU internal market, focusing on quantitative restrictions (QRs) and measures having equivalent effect (MHEE to QRs). the definition of the internal market, the prohibition of QRs and MHEE to QRs on trade between member states, and examples of national trade measures not allowed. It also discusses situations where member-states are allowed to restrict or prohibit the free movement of goods.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 27
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Click icon to add picture
Your imports or exports from / to another member- state cleared customs.
No duties / tariffs to pay! (see session 2)
But is there anything else to worry about?
not allowed.
to restrict or prohibit the free movement of goods.
member states.
to signal the deeper and more intensive nature of trade and economic integration between the member states.
(QRs) and OF MEASURES HAVING EQUIVALENT EFFECT (MHEE to QR) ON TRADE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES Art. 34, 35, 36 TFEU (see notespage)
Questions
Are ‘buy national products’ campaigns a prohibited MHEE? NO, if campaign conducted by private bodies. YES, if campaign conducted by the state. What exactly is the state?
These are tricky to identify! They appear lawful because they do not distinguish / discriminate between national and imported goods. They apply to both BUT have a harsher effect on imported goods.
see notespage for Court extract.
The Court ruled that there was no valid reason that a product lawfully marketed in one member state should not be introduced in another member state. Principle of mutual recognition.
Result: wide opening of the gates for intra-Community trade.
Cassis is example of dual-burden rules: rules apply to both domestic and imported goods but affect imported goods because manufacturer would have to comply with rules of state of origin AND rules of import state Two sets of rules = dual burden.
Another example: Belgian law that margarine be packed in cube shaped containers so consumers do not confuse it with butter. ( Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA Case 261/81)