Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Landmark Supreme Court Cases in Education and their Impact on Equality in American Schools, Quizzes of Introduction to Sociology

Definitions and outcomes of notable supreme court cases from 1896 to 1995 that shaped the education system in the united states, focusing on issues of equality, equity, and desegregation. Cases include plessey v ferguson, brown v board of education, swan v charlotte-mecklenburg board of education, and more.

Typology: Quizzes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 02/15/2012

gym11kid
gym11kid 🇺🇸

5

(1)

41 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
TERM 1
1896: Plessey V Ferguson
DEFINITION 1
ferguson wonseperate but equal okay 7-1
TERM 2
1954: Brown V Board of Education.
DEFINITION 2
brown won 9-0 decision of the Warren Court. Established that
separate schools were inherently unequal
TERM 3
1971: Swan V Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of
Education
DEFINITION 3
9-0 charolette won they found it was approporate to bus the
children for integration
TERM 4
1973: Keyes v School District No. 1 of
Denver
DEFINITION 4
keyes won 7-1 segregation was ruled unjust
TERM 5
1973: San Antonio Independent School
District V. Rodriquez
DEFINITION 5
san antonio independent school district won 5-4Did Texas'
public education finance system violate the Fourteenth
Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by failing to distribute
funding equally among its school districts? ( property tax is
okay to fund education)
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Landmark Supreme Court Cases in Education and their Impact on Equality in American Schools and more Quizzes Introduction to Sociology in PDF only on Docsity!

1896: Plessey V Ferguson

ferguson wonseperate but equal okay 7- TERM 2

1954: Brown V Board of Education.

DEFINITION 2 brown won 9-0 decision of the Warren Court. Established that separate schools were inherently unequal TERM 3

1971: Swan V Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of

Education

DEFINITION 3 9-0 charolette won they found it was approporate to bus the children for integration TERM 4

1973: Keyes v School District No. 1 of

Denver

DEFINITION 4 keyes won 7-1 segregation was ruled unjust TERM 5

1973: San Antonio Independent School

District V. Rodriquez

DEFINITION 5 san antonio independent school district won 5-4Did Texas' public education finance system violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by failing to distribute funding equally among its school districts? ( property tax is okay to fund education)

1974: Milken V Bradley

milliken won 5-4they cant just add in more whites to make it even by busing... so you cant bus students ( no violation no remedy) TERM 7

1978: Regents of University of California v

Bakke

DEFINITION 7 bakke won 5-4no quota butaffirmativeaction okay cant reserve seats TERM 8

1988 Kadrmas V Dickinson

DEFINITION 8 dickonson won 5-4 Poor family claimed that North Dakota statute allow charging a fee for bus riding was unconstitutional. Court said that it was not because it did not require a fee for school and that education was not a right(ok to charge charge fee for bus education was not a right) TERM 9

1991: Board of Education of Oklahoma City

Public Schools v Dowell

DEFINITION 9 oklahoma board won 5-3court said they could get rid of the desegregation law ( wanted to get rid of law saying they had to because it had been around for so long) TERM 10

1992: Freeman v

Pitts

DEFINITION 10 freeman won 8-0court had no say unless they failed to comply w desegration plan

vygotsky

children togetherpiget alone TERM 17

equality/equity

DEFINITION 17 equal acess / right to chose TERM 18

public v

private

DEFINITION 18 james coleman found private schols have more limited cirriculm but they have better test scores. but there was some critisism in his accuracy.if there is a choice competition will make it better ... increases acountability because if you chose a school they have to listen to what you want or you can go somewhere elseothers say it will create wider gaps. TERM 19

ability grouping

DEFINITION 19 Ability grouping is the educational practice of grouping students by academic potential or past achievement.animal names but kids still knowsome say good because it can challange youothers say bad because high will already be there and low will be stigmatized.. high groups more funding than low.teacher expectations are influenced by groups TERM 20

functionalists

DEFINITION 20 believe that school is good because it sorts out good from bad and has mobility for poor to move up

conflict

it creates a middle class bias more for the middle class so they retain power TERM 22

sorting process

DEFINITION 22 iq testing what are you really testing TERM 23

great equalizer

DEFINITION 23 education TERM 24

polyana hypothesis

DEFINITION 24 women believe you are rewarded the more you work more uyoull get TERM 25

social powerlessness

DEFINITION 25 well educated women find well education to marry