Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Social Psychology Notes: Week 1, Lecture notes of Social Psychology

A document consisting of notes on introductory social psychology, confirmation bias, the self-fulfilling prophecy, behavioral confirmation, and Chapter 1 of Social Psychology by David Myers.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Available from 11/20/2022

chebuuri
chebuuri 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Day 1 notes:
- Social psychology = environment/situational factors common to many of us
- Societal applications to trace a line/pave the way for social transformation
- Directly relevant to situations most of us face
- “I knew it all along” eect (hindsight bias)
- Two dierent “facts” given to students, asked whether the nding was surprising
- Many people said the nding was not surprising
- Social psychology - how people act in relationships/groups, as well as study of environment aecting
people | “the scientic study of how people inuence, think about, and relate to one another”
- How does it dier from sociology?
- Sociology = more about social systems than social individuals
- Institutions, global markets, policies
- Replication crisis in psychology because some ndings don’t replicate
- Be critical consumers of information
- Focus most heavily on replicated, classic social psychology examples
Day 2 notes:
- Conrmation bias: search for info that conrms hunch
- Four card task: things that conrm/reinforce the rule are frequently ipped over
- Has to do with how we construct reality on day to day basis
- People have certain biases/preconceived notions
- Counterevidence is explained away (ex. stereotypes)
- Common when people are given a rule that’s agreeable/nonthreatening
- Looking for disconrming evidence is not natural
- If people are motivated enough, they can disconrm rules
- Self-fullling prophecy
- “The self-fullling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false denition of a situation, evoking a
behavior that makes the original false statement true”
- Misconception/falsehood that, due to behavioral dynamics, later proves true
- Rosenthal and Jacobson study
- Grade school teachers were given diagnostic information that some of their students
would bloom in the coming year (around )
- The bloomers were selected at random
- As measured by IQ tests, about eight months later, the ones who were described as
academic bloomers had signicantly higher IQ tests
- Those kids were getting more attention/latitude from the teachers
- Incorrect information that induced expectation that brought about what was earlier
predicted (the Pygmalion eect)
- Very replicable and real phenomenon
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Social Psychology Notes: Week 1 and more Lecture notes Social Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Day 1 notes:

  • Social psychology = environment/situational factors common to many of us
    • Societal applications to trace a line/pave the way for social transformation
    • Directly relevant to situations most of us face
  • “I knew it all along” eect (hindsight bias)
    • Two dierent “facts” given to students, asked whether the nding was surprising
    • Many people said the nding was not surprising
  • Social psychology - how people act in relationships/groups, as well as study of environment aecting people | “the scientic study of how people inuence, think about, and relate to one another” - How does it dier from sociology? - Sociology = more about social systems than social individuals - Institutions, global markets, policies
  • Replication crisis in psychology because some ndings don’t replicate
    • Be critical consumers of information
    • Focus most heavily on replicated, classic social psychology examples Day 2 notes:
  • Conrmation bias: search for info that conrms hunch
  • Four card task: things that conrm/reinforce the rule are frequently ipped over
  • Has to do with how we construct reality on day to day basis
  • People have certain biases/preconceived notions
  • Counterevidence is explained away (ex. stereotypes)
  • Common when people are given a rule that’s agreeable/nonthreatening
  • Looking for disconrming evidence is not natural
  • If people are motivated enough, they can disconrm rules
  • Self-fullling prophecy
  • “The self-fullling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false denition of a situation, evoking a behavior that makes the original false statement true”
  • Misconception/falsehood that, due to behavioral dynamics, later proves true
  • Rosenthal and Jacobson study
  • Grade school teachers were given diagnostic information that some of their students would bloom in the coming year (around ⅕)
  • The bloomers were selected at random
  • As measured by IQ tests, about eight months later, the ones who were described as academic bloomers had signicantly higher IQ tests
  • Those kids were getting more attention/latitude from the teachers
  • Incorrect information that induced expectation that brought about what was earlier predicted (the Pygmalion eect)
  • Very replicable and real phenomenon
  • Suppose that North Korea suspects that South Korea is aggressive, so it makes nuclear weapons. South Korea sees the armament as aggressive and begins defensively arming. North Korea goes: see? This is what we expected! (the security dilemma - false perspectives of aggression ratchet up the competition) - Example: WWI, the current situation with Russia
  • Without a control group, you don’t know whether the original prophecy is true
    • Controlled laboratory research where we can make denitive statements about causality
  • 1970s: Mark Snyder/colleagues explored behavioral conrmation
  • Behavioral conrmation: people’s social expectations lead them to behave in a way that causes others to conrm these expectations
  • Types of participants
  • Labeling perceivers
  • Target subjects
  • Naive perceivers
  • Labeling perceiver and target subject lead into one room, each told that they were competing with each other in reaction time contest
  • Each told that they had a noise weapon (distracting, dierent levels)
  • Participants had headphones
  • Trait survey lled out beforehand, labeling perceiver given a fake trait survey beforehand that was “about” the target subject, sometimes made the person seem very competitive OR very cooperative/submissive
  • Expectations randomly induced
  • In the hostile label condition
  • Labeling perceivers were more aggressive with noise weapons
  • Target subjects returned re
  • Labeling perceivers’ expectation induced that aggression
  • In the cooperative label condition
  • Labeling perceivers were less aggressive with noise weapons
  • Labeling perceivers leave
  • Target subjects and naive perceivers
  • Same kind of reaction time competition
  • Naive perceivers don’t know anything about the preconceived notions
  • Target subjects start with the noise machine
  • Told beforehand that either the noise machine use has to do with character or has to do with situation
  • When told that use of the weapon had to do with character
  • Continued to behave aggressively
  • When told that use of the weapon didn’t have to do with character
  • Illustrated how poor treatment of Black applicants can lead to self-fullling prophecy Chapter 1 Notes
  • Social psychology = science of how people think about, inuence, and relate to one another
  • Sociology = study of people in groups and societies
  • Social psychology = focuses more on individuals, performs more experiments
  • Focus on how people view and aect one another rather than dierences among individuals (like personality psychology)
  • Examples of how social psychology studies thinking/inuences/relationships
  • Does our social behavior depend more on situations we face or on how we interpret them?
  • Interpretations matter
  • Would people be cruel if ordered?
  • Yes (Stanley Milgram experiment, ordered to administer increasing levels of electric shock to someone who was having diculty learning series of words)
  • To help or to help oneself?
  • Help oneself wins out
  • Big ideas of social psychology
  • We construct our social reality
  • Example: game lms shown to Dartmouth and Princeton students → Princeton students saw twice as many Dartmouth violations as Dartmouth students saw
  • Reality is viewed through lens of our beliefs and values
  • Our social intuitions are often powerful but sometimes perilous
  • Instant intuitions shape fears, impressions, and relationships
  • We think on two levels: intuitive and deliberate
  • Example: intuitively judge likelihood of events by how easily they come to mind
  • Intuitions about ourselves can be in error (misread our own minds, deny being aected by things that inuence us, mispredict our feelings)
  • Social inuences shape our behavior
  • Respond to our immediate contexts, even if our expressed attitudes are dierent
  • Culture helps dene our situations
  • Our attitudes and behavior are shaped by external social forces
  • “People are, above all, malleable”
  • Personal attitudes and dispositions also shape behavior
  • Internal forces matter
  • Personality dispositions (people in the same situation may react dierently)
  • Social behavior is biologically rooted
  • Inherited human nature predisposes us to behave in ways that helped our ancestors
  • Neurobiology underlying behavior
  • Social neuroscience
  • Social psychology’s principles are applicable in everyday life
  • Hindsight bias: the “I knew it all along” phenomenon
  • Research methods
  • Sampling/question wording
  • Sampling → random sampling
  • Wording → avoid framing
  • Correlational research/experimental research
  • Key: can participants be randomly assigned to condition?
  • Mundane realism/experimental realism
  • Mundane: closely resemble everyday life
  • Experimental: engages the participant
  • Demand characteristics
  • Cues from experimenters that “demand” certain behavior Chapter 2 Notes:
  • Spotlight eect: overestimate extent to which others’ attention is aimed at us
  • Illusion of transparency: idea that emotions leak out/are visible to other people
  • Social surroundings aect our self awareness
  • Ex. white American friend feeling self-consciously white living in rural village in Nepal
  • Self-interest colors our social judgment
  • Ex. when things go poorly in a close relationship, we blame our partners instead of ourselves
  • Ex. when things go well, we see ourselves as more responsible
  • Self-concern motivates our social behavior
  • Social relationships help dene our sense of self
  • Self-concept
  • Self-schemas = mental templates by which we organize our worlds, specically how we perceive/remember/evaluate other people/ourselves
  • Social comparisons = others help dene standard by which we dene ourselves
  • Other people’s judgments = when people think well of us, we think well of ourselves
  • Looking-glass self = use of how we think others perceive us as a mirror for perceiving ourselves (the way we imagine others see us)
  • Self and culture
  • Individualism: identity is self-contained, independent self
  • Identity remains fairly constant
  • Collectivism: respecting/identifying with the group, more self-critical, focus less on positive self-views
  • People w/ high self-esteem: react to threat by compensating for it
  • People w/ low self-esteem: more likely to blame themselves/give up
  • Motive to maintain/enhance self-esteem
  • Self-esteem gauge alerts us to threatened social rejection
  • Terror management theory: humans must nd ways to manage overwhelming fear of death (reality of death motivates us to gain recognition from work/valeus)
  • Actively pursuing self-esteem can backre
  • Self-esteem contingent on external sources → more stress, anger, relationship problems, drug/alcohol use, eating disorders than those whose self-worth = rooted in internal sources
  • Those who pursue self-esteem may lose sight of what makes them feel good about themselves
  • Focus on boosting self-esteem → less open to criticism, less likely to empathize, more pressured to succeed at activities (not enjoy them)
  • Trade-o of low versus high self esteem
  • Low self esteem = more vulnerable to anxiety, loneliness, depression, eating disorders, intentional self=harm
  • High self esteem= fosters initiative, resilience, pleasant feelings
  • Teen gang leaders, ethnocentrists, terrorists, men in prison for commiting violent crimes = higher than average self-esteem
  • Does not cause better academic achievement/superior work performance
  • Narcissism
  • Inated sense of self
  • More than just high self-esteem
  • Belief that you are better/smarter than others
  • High-self esteem without caring for others
  • Those high in both self-esteem/narcissism = most likely to retaliate against classmate’s criticism/lash out when insult is delivered publicly
  • Self-ecacy
  • How competent we feel on a task
  • Strong self-ecacy → more persistent, less anxious, less depressed
  • Set more challenging goals/persist, predicts productivity, student GPA
  • Self-serving bias
  • Tendency to perceive oneself favorably
  • Explaining positive and negative events
  • People accept credit when told they have succeeded, but attribute failure to external factors
  • Self-serving attribution: attributing positive outcomes to oneself, negative outcomes to something else - Helps maintain positive self-image
  • Often biased against seeing our own bias (bias blind spot)
  • Collectivists: less likely to self-enhance by believing they are better than others
  • Can we all be better than average?
    • Most people see themselves as better than the average person
    • Group members’ estimates of how much they contribute to a joint task typically sum to more than 100%
    • Stronger for traits that are subjective/dicult to measure
  • Unrealistic optimism
  • Illusory optimism increases vulnerability
  • Optimism beats pessimism in promoting self-ecacy, health, and well being
  • Defensive pessimism: anticipates problems/motivates eective coping
  • False consensus and uniqueness
  • False consensus: overestimate how much others agree with us
  • False uniqueness eect: see our talents and moral behaviors as relatively unusual
  • Explaining self-serving bias
  • Errors in how we process/remember information about ourselves
  • Management of self-presentation
  • Self-handicapping: sabotaging chances for success by creating impediments that make success less likely (provide excuse for doing badly)
  • Ex. reduce preparation for important individual athletic events, give opponent advantage, perform poorly at beginning of a task to not create unreachable expectations
  • Attribute failures to external factors → fear of failure
  • Self-image tied to performance
  • Impression management
  • Self-presentation: wanting to present desired image to external/ internal audience
  • Self-monitoring: “I tend to be what people expect me to be”
  • Use self-presentation to adjust behavior in response to external situations