










Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An overview of structured observation in social research, outlining its advantages, disadvantages, and ethical considerations. It also explores other data sources, including personal documents, official statistics, and secondary analysis, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The document emphasizes the importance of reliability and validity in research, discussing concepts like inter-observer consistency, intra-observer consistency, and measurement validity.
Typology: Exams
1 / 18
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Structured Observation is not used very often by social researchers because: -
Concurrent Validity - A type of validity that is tested by relating a measure to an existing criterion or a different indicator of the concept to see if one predicts the other; one of the main forms of measurement validity. Structured Observation Issues of Validity: Error in Implementation - Is the observation schedule being administered as directed? Do people change their behaviour when they known they are being observed? Field Experiment - A study in which a researcher directly intervenes in a natural setting to observe the consequence of that intervention. Covert Observation - Participants are not aware that they are being studied Structured Observation: Ethical Issue of Field Experiments - Deception Criticisms of Structured Observation -
.75 = very good .75< x >.6 = good .4< x >.59 = fair. Structured Observation - A relatively undressed method in social research. It entails the direct observation of behaviour, which is analyzed using categories that are devised before the observation begins. Other Sources of Data - Includes: Personal documents, Secondary analysis, and Official Statistics (unobtrusive measures). Validity - A research criterion concerned with the integrity of the conclusions generated by a particular study. Other Sources of Data: Personal Documents -
◦ Ecological fallacy - data gathered at region or household level is used to make statements about individuals ◦ No control over data quality ◦ Absence of key variables Other Sources of Data: Official Statistics Advantages - ◦ Based on populations not samples ◦ Since data is not being gathered in a study format, reactivity is less pronounced ◦ Increased prospect of analyzing data longitudinally and cross- sectionally Other Sources of Data: Official Statistics Disadvantages - ◦ Misleading, e.g., crime rates - what about under-reported or not reported crimes Reactivity/ Reactive effect - The effect on research participants of knowing that they are being studied, which may result in atypical or inauthentic behaviour. Reliability - The degree to which a measure of a concept is stable or consistent. Other Sources of Data: Official Statistics Reliability and Validity Issues -
The Nature of Qualitative Research: Interpretivist: - An epistemological position that requires the social scientist to grasp the subjective meanings that people attach to their actions and behaviours. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Constructionist: - An ontological position (the antithesis of objectivism) according to which social phenomena and their meanings are continually being created by social actors. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Naturalistic Approach: - A style of research designed to minimize disturbance to the natural or everyday social world. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Ethnography/Participant observation - A research method in which the researched is immersed in a social setting for an extended period of time, observing behaviour, asking questions, and analyzing what is said in conversations both between subjects ad with the fieldworker. As a term, ethnography is more inclusive than participant observation, which emphasizes the observational component. Written accounts of ethnographic research are often referred to as ethnographies. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Unstructured Interviewing - An interview in which the interviewer is free to explore any topic, although an interview guide is often used. the questioning is usually informal and the content, phrasing and sequencing of questions may vary from one interview to the next. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Focus Groups - A form of group interview in which there are several participants; there is an emphasis in the questioning on a particular topic or related topics; and interaction within the group and the joint construction of meaning is observed. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Discourse Analysis - An approach to the analysis of talk and other forms of communication that emphasizes the way language can create versions of reality. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Conversation Analysis - The fine drained analysis of talk (recorded in naturally occurring situations and then transcribed) to uncover the underlying structures in interaction that make social order possible. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Qualitative content analysis - An approach to constructing the meaning of documents and text that allows categories to emerge out of data analysis and recognizes the significance of the context in which items appear. The Nature of Qualitative Research: Participatory action research - Research in which local people affected by a particular social problem collaborate as equals with professional researchers and government officials to generate knowledge pertinent to the problem and to take action to ameliorate it. The Nature of Qualitative Research: The Main Steps -
Ensuring that researcher's interpretations are congruent with the participants' lived experiences. Difficulties: Defensive reactions from participants; participants may be reluctant to be critical; language incongruence The Nature of Qualitative Research: Transferability - Geertz's (1972) "thick descriptions" The Nature of Qualitative Research: Dependability - "auditing" approach with peers as auditors The Nature of Qualitative Research: Confirmability - ensuring that the researcher has acted in "good faith;" one of the objectives of the external auditors The Nature of Qualitative Research: Issue of Criteria - Need for reliability and validity checks to ensure "scientific rigour" of the study The Nature of Qualitative Research: Main Goals -
Ethnography and Participant Observation - Require extended involved in the activities of the people under study Four Types of Ethnography -
Feminist Ethnography - Form of Participatory Action Research (PAR) Goal: giving "voice"to vulnerable or marginalized groups of women Non-exploitative - negotiated relationship; reciprocity From a female standpoint Understanding women in context Ethnography: Exiting the Field - Reasons for exiting: ◦ Personal ◦ Time constraints ◦ Research questions have been sufficiently answered -"saturation" of themes Protocol and ethical commitments, i.e., maintaining anonymity of participants Unstructured Interviewing - ◦ Can be a narrative - one question to begin ◦ Similar to a conversation ◦ Series of prompts with very few questions Semi-Structured Interviewing - ◦ Series of questions and prompts ◦ Interview guide or schedule Interviewing in Qualitative Research: Steps to Formulate Questions (GSIFRPIRF) - general research area > specific research questions > interview topics > formulate interview questions > review/revise interview questions > pilot guide (test) > identify novel issues > review interview questions > finalize guide Interviewing: Types of Questions (IFPSDISSI) - Kvale's nine types:
◦ Allows researcher to elicit a wide variety of perspectives on an issue ◦ Interviewees may challenge each other, eliciting more realistic accounts ◦ Reflect the processes through which meaning is constructed in everyday life - more naturalistic than one-on-one interviews Interviewing: Selecting Focus Groups - ◦ Generally 6-10 per group ◦ Selection on basis of socio-demographic (e.g., gender, class, age, ethnicity) or other characteristics (e.g., professional group/category) Interviewing: Group Interaction - Complementary vs. argumentative Interviewing: Limitations of Focus Groups -
The Convenience Sample -
◦ e.g., religious affiliation, marital status, province of residence Qualitative Data Analysis: Ordinal Variables - The categories of the variable can be rank ordered ◦ e.g., self-reported health status: categories are "excellent,"very good," "good," "fair," and "poor" ◦ Distance or amount of difference between categories may not be equal ◦ Cannot do arithmetic or mathematical operations with the categories Qualitative Data Analysis: Interval/ratio: - ◦ Distance or amount of difference between categories is uniform, e.g., Number of siblings: 0 siblings, 1 sibling, 2 siblings, etc. ◦ Can do arithmetic and mathematical operations with the categories, e.g., 1 sibling + 3 siblings = 4 siblings Interval/ratio variables can be reduced to ordinal or nominal variables (although that involves a loss of information) ◦ e.g., ageàage categories (young, mid-life, old) Qualitative Data Analysis: Univariate Analysis: Frequency Tables - Often, the first step in the analysis is to create frequency tables for the variables of interest. When interval/ratio variables are shown in frequency tables, some of the categories may be combined, otherwise the table would become too large ◦ e.g., age, income Qualitative Data Analysis: Univariate Analysis: Diagrams - Diagrams can be used to illustrate frequency distributions These include bar charts, pie charts, and histograms ◦ Bar and pie charts - nominal + ordinal level variables ◦ Histograms - interval/ratio level variables (may be collapsed categories or not) Measures of Central Tendancy: Mode - Mode: The most frequently occurring score, category or value ◦ Can be used with all levels of measurement Measures of Central Tendancy: Median - Median: The middle score when all scores have been arrayed in order (typically from lowest to highest) ◦ Can be used with ordinal or interval/ratio data ◦ If there is an even number of cases, take the mean of the middle two cases Measures of Central Tendancy: Mean - Mean: sum of all scores, divided by the number of scores ◦ Can be used with interval/ratio data ◦ Vulnerable to outliers (extreme scores - low or high) Measures of Dispersion: range - Maximum (highest) score minus minimum (lowest) score ◦ Influenced by outliers
l Fewer 'clear cut rules' l Uses guidelines l Coding is the main feature l Inductive l Iterative or reiterative Qualitative Data Analysis: Analytic induction - an approach to the analysis of qualitative data in which the collection of data continues and the hypothesis is modified until no cases inconstant with it are found. example: l Research question - How do people experience grief? l Hypothetical answer - '5 stages' l Researcher would collect data l Universal explanation would be found - Maybe grief is a more positive process when grief is considered legitimate by others (legitimation of experience critique: l Lack of useful guidelines (e.g., number of cases) l Explanations generated can be too broad Qualitative Data Analysis: Grounded Theory - an approach to the analysis of qualitative data in which the goal is to use the data to generate theory; the data collection and analysis proceed in an iterative fashion. Tools: l Theoretical saturation - the point where no new data arises l Constant comparison - process of comparing new data with data already collected in the study l Coding Example: l Select sample l Conduct interviews l Immediately transcribe, code (open, axial, and selective) and memo l Practise constant comparison (e.g., explore relationships, develop and saturate categories) l Theoretically sample l Develop a 'grounded theory' Outcomes: l Concepts - 'labels given to discrete phenomena' l Categories - an abstract collection of concepts l Properties - 'attributes or aspects of a category' l Hypotheses - 'initial hunches about relationships between concepts' l Theory - A collection of related categories intended to explain a phenomena Critiques: l Is it possible to suspend all other/prior knowledge? l Transcription l Reaching saturation is problematic l Fragmentation and loss of context
Qualitative Data Analysis: Narrative analysis - an approach focused on the search for and analysis of stories that people use to understand their lives and the world around them. Four Models: