Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Two-Body and Three-Body Decays in Particle Physics: A Comprehensive Guide, Lecture notes of Physics

Application of four momentum conservation relativistic kinematics and domestic of two body decay of constable particle

Typology: Lecture notes

2019/2020

Uploaded on 03/30/2020

Srj9891
Srj9891 🇮🇳

5

(1)

3 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
3. Two-body decays of unstable particles.
The simplest kind of particle reaction is the two-body decay of unstable particles. Awell
known example from nuclear physics is the alpha decayofheavy nuclei. In particle physics one
observes, for instance, decays of charged pions or kaons into muons and neutrinos, or decays of
neutral kaons into pairs of pions,
etc
. The unstable particle is the
mother particle
and its decay
products are the
daughter particles
.
Consider the decay of a particle of mass
M
which is initially at rest. Then its 4-momentum
is P = (
M;
0
;
0
;
0). This reference frame is called the
centre-of mass frame
(CMS). Denote the 4-
momenta of the two daughter particles byp
1
and p
2
:p
1
=(
E
1
;~p
1
), p
2
=(
E
2
;~p
2
). 4-momentum
conservation requires that
P=p
1
+p
2
(13)
and hence
~p
2
=
;
~p
1
.We can therefore omit the subscript on the particle momenta and hence
energy conservation takes on the form
E
1
+
E
2
=
q
m
2
1
+
p
2
+
q
m
2
2
+
p
2
=
M
(14)
Solving this equation for
p
weget
p
=
1
2
M
q
[
M
2
;
(
m
1
;
m
2
)
2
][
M
2
;
(
m
1
+
m
2
)
2
](15)
An immediate consequence of Eq. (14) is that
M
m
1
+
m
2
(16)
i.e.
a particle can decay only if its mass exceeds the sum of the masses of its decay products.
Conversely, if some particle has a mass that exceeds the masses of two other particles, then this
particle is unstable and decays, unless the decay is forbidden by some conservation law, such
as conservation of charge or of angular momentum
etc
.
Another point to note is that the momenta of the daughter particles and hence also their
energies are xed by the masses of the three particles. In the next section we shall see that
there is no equivalent statement in the case of three-bo dy decays: the momenta of the daughter
particles in three-bo dy decays can takeonanyvalue from zero to some maximum, and it is
only the maximum momentum that is xed by the masses of the particles.
Let us complete our calculation by deriving the formul for the energies of the daughter
particles. This is straightforward if we begin from the energy conservation formula (14) and
express
E
2
in terms of
E
1
,viz.
E
2
=
q
E
2
1
;
m
2
1
+
m
2
2
, and then solvefor
E
1
to get
E
1
=
1
2
M
M
2
+
m
2
1
;
m
2
2
(17)
and similarly
E
2
=
1
2
M
M
2
+
m
2
2
;
m
2
1
(18)
We also note that there is no preferred direction in which the daughter particles travel (the
decayissaidtobe
isotropic
), but if the direction of one of the particles is chosen (e.g. by
the positioning of a detector), then the direction of the second particle is xed by momentum
conservation: the daughter particles are traveling
back-to-back
in the rest frame of the mother
particle.
Frequently one observes that the masses of the twodaughter particles are equal, for instance
in the decay of a neutral kaon into a pair of pions. In this case the previous formul simplify: the
5
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Two-Body and Three-Body Decays in Particle Physics: A Comprehensive Guide and more Lecture notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

  1. Two-b o dy decays of unstable particles. The simplest kind of particle reaction is the two-b o dy decay of unstable particles. A well known example from nuclear physics is the alpha decay of heavy nuclei. In particle physics one observes, for instance, decays of charged pions or kaons into muons and neutrinos, or decays of neutral kaons into pairs of pions, etc. The unstable particle is the mother particle and its decay pro ducts are the daughter particles. Consider the decay of a particle of mass M which is initially at rest. Then its 4-momentum is P = (M ; 0 ; 0 ; 0). This reference frame is called the centre-of mass frame (CMS). Denote the 4- momenta of the two daughter particles by p 1 and p 2 : p 1 = (E 1 ; ~p 1 ), p 2 = (E 2 ; ~p 2 ). 4-momentum conservation requires that P = p 1 + p 2 (13)

and hence ~p 2 = ~p 1. We can therefore omit the subscript on the particle momenta and hence

energy conservation takes on the form

E 1 + E 2 =

q

m^21 + p^2 +

q

m^22 + p^2 = M (14)

Solving this equation for p we get

p =

2 M

q

[M 2 (m 1 m 2 )^2 ] [M 2 (m 1 + m 2 )^2 ] (15)

An immediate consequence of Eq. (14) is that

M  m 1 + m 2 (16)

i.e. a particle can decay only if its mass exceeds the sum of the masses of its decay pro ducts. Conversely, if some particle has a mass that exceeds the masses of two other particles, then this particle is unstable and decays, unless the decay is forbidden by some conservation law, such as conservation of charge or of angular momentum etc. Another p oint to note is that the momenta of the daughter particles and hence also their energies are xed by the masses of the three particles. In the next section we shall see that there is no equivalent statement in the case of three-b o dy decays: the momenta of the daughter particles in three-b o dy decays can take on any value from zero to some maximum, and it is only the maximum momentum that is xed by the masses of the particles. Let us complete our calculation by deriving the formul for the energies of the daughter particles. This is straightforward if we b egin from the energy conservation formula (14) and

express E 2 in terms of E 1 , viz. E 2 =

q

E 12 m^21 + m^22 , and then solve for E 1 to get

E 1 =

2 M

M 2 + m^21 m^22

and similarly

E 2 =

2 M

M 2 + m^22 m^21

We also note that there is no preferred direction in which the daughter particles travel (the decay is said to b e isotropic), but if the direction of one of the particles is chosen (e.g. by the p ositioning of a detector), then the direction of the second particle is xed by momentum conservation: the daughter particles are traveling back-to-back in the rest frame of the mother particle. Frequently one observes that the masses of the two daughter particles are equal, for instance in the decay of a neutral kaon into a pair of pions. In this case the previous formul simplify: the

energies of the daughter particles are E 1 = E 2 = 12 M and the momenta are p = (^12)

p

M 2 4 m^2 ,

if we denote the common mass of the daughter particles by m. Of interest is also the two-b o dy decay of unstable particles in ight. For instance, high energy b eams of muons or of neutrinos are pro duced in accelerators by letting the internal b eam of protons impinge on a target of metal (thin foils or wires are used in practice) to pro duce pions and kaons, which are then steered in a vacuum tub e in which they decay into muons and neutrinos. Other cases of great interest are the decays of very short-lived reaction pro ducts of high energy collisions, such as, for instance, the decays of B mesons or of D mesons, which are copiously pro duced in mo dern high energy colliders. To illustrate the imp ortance of a prop er discussion of such in- ight decays suce it to say that this is frequently the only way to measure the mass of a neutral particle. Thus we now have the following 4-momenta of the three particles: for the mother particles we write P = (E ; 0 ; 0 ; p), and for the daughter particles we have p 1 = (E 1 ; p~ 1? ; p 1 z ) and p 2 = (E 2 ; p~ 2? ; p 2 z ). This means that we have chosen the z axis along the direction of ight of the mother particle. The immediate result of this is that by momentum conservation the (two- dimensional) transverse momentum vectors are equal in magnitude and opp osite in sign:

~p?  ~p 1? = ~p 2? (19)

The energies and the z comp onents of the particle momenta are related to those in the CMS by a Lorentz b o ost with a b o ost velo city equal to the sp eed of the mother particle. We lab el the kinematical variables in the CMS with asterisks and write the Lorentz transformation of particle 1 in the form of

E 1 = (E  1 + v p 1 z ) p 1 z = (p 1 z + v E 1  ) (20) ~p 1? = ~p 1 ?

and similarly for particle 2. Here v = p=E and = E =M. This completely solves the problem in principle. We can now, for instance, nd the angles which the two daughter particles make with the z axis and with each other as functions of the momentum of the mother particle (Exercise 1). But it is also of interest to approach the problem in a di erent way, without using the Lorentz transformation, starting from energy-momentum conservation:

E = E 1 + E 2 =

q

m^21 + p^21 +

q

m^22 + p^22 (21) ~p = ~p 1 + ~p 2 (22)

Thus, replacing in the energy conservation equation, p^22 by (~p ~p 1 )^2 we get an equation with un-

known momentum p 1 and angle  1 b etween ~p 1 and the z axis. Solving for p 1 is a straightforward if lengthy calculation (Exercise 2). In the end we get

p 1 =

(M 2 + m^21 m^22 )p cos  1  2 E

q

M 2 p^2 m^21 p^2 sin^2  1

2(M 2 + p^2 sin^2  1 )

This result is of interest in the following sense. Reality of p 1 demands that (M 2 p^2

m^21 p^2 sin^2  1 )  0. This condition is satis ed for all angles  1 if M p =m 1 p > 1. In this case the

lower sign must b e rejected since otherwise we would get unphysical negative values of p 1 for  1 >  =2. On the other hand, if M p^ =m 1 p < 1, then there is a maximum value of  1 , given by sin  1 max = M p =m 1 p. Now b oth signs must b e kept: for each value of  1 <  1 max there are