















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Identifying Premises and Conclusions,Read the Arguments Carefully and Include any Tacit Premises.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 23
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Philosophers usually present their arguments to us in prose (full sentences and paragraphs). It is often helpful to take an argument from its original prose statement and lay out its premise(s) and conclusion(s). This is called 'standard form', because then its reasoning can be seen more clearly.
Most of the time, you will need to convert an argument from prose form into standard form Here are the steps to follow:
We should not inflict unnecessary pain on cows and pigs. After all, we should not inflict unnecessary pain on any animal with consciousness, and cows and pigs are animals with consciousness.
We should not inflict unnecessary pain on cows and pigs. After all, we should not inflict unnecessary pain on any animal with consciousness, and cows and pigs are animals with consciousness.
We should not inflict unnecessary pain on cows and pigs. After all, we should not inflict unnecessary pain on any animal with consciousness, and cows and pigs are animals with consciousness.
We should not inflict unnecessary pain on cows and pigs. After all, we should not inflict unnecessary pain on any animal with consciousness, and cows and pigs are animals with consciousness.
Re-write each of the following 7 arguments in Standard Form, then read the last 3 SF arguments and tell me what is wrong with them. You need to submit these 10 answers to me by the end of this week!
If this liquid is acidic, the litmus paper would have turned red. But it hasn't, so the liquid is not acidic.
He is either in Hong Kong or Macau. John says that he is not in Hong Kong. So, he must be in Macau.
If the Government wants to build an incinerator here, they should compensate those who live in the area. Incinerators are known to cause health problems to people living nearby. These people did not choose to live there in the first place.
It is a mistake to think that medical problems can be treated solely by medication. That’s because medication does not address psychological and lifestyle issues. Medical problems are not purely biochemical. They involve issues of attitude and way of life.
Haven’t we had enough letters to the editorial page of the Spectator every day and from cry-baby steel workers talking about how the Stelco strike is killing them? I am sure there are hundreds of pro-union letters going into the Spectator office, but only the anti-union ones get printed. I would not be a bit surprised if Stelco and the Spectator were working together to lower the morale of the steel workers who chose to strike for higher wages.