

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Exam; Professor: Fiore; Class: Computer Programming; Subject: Electrical Technology; University: Mohawk Valley Community College-Utica Branch; Term: Unknown 1989;
Typology: Exams
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Assessment ET154 Computer Programming J Fiore Student Learning Outcomes (from Course Outline)
Grade of D: Program exhibits problems in several output areas and documentation and/or coding techniques are vague or confusing. Grade of F: Program exhibits any of the following deficiencies: majority of the program results are not correct under most conditions, coding style is substandard or obtuse, internal documentation missing. For items 4 and 5 , the student will be given a circuit schematic which will include placement of an instrument (DMM). In the computer lab the student is expected to use MultiSIM to capture the schematic and run a simulation (to obtain a voltage). The schematic must match the original, including all component values, proper placement and orientation of components, proper use of labels, and proper placement and editing of a title block. Some components will be virtual types (resistors and capacitors) while others may be obtained through the component database (transistor and diode). Grade of A: Minor or no errors. Example errors include a single simple incorrect unit value (such as 220 k Ohms versus 220 Ohms), a missing label (such as Vin), and minor problems with the title block. These errors are largely cosmetic. Grade of B: Schematic includes multiples of the types of errors noted above, although generally the wiring would be fine. Most errors are cosmetic and it would take only minor work, if any, to fix the circuit to produce a proper simulation. Grade of C: Schematic includes minor wiring mistakes or numerous errors of the type noted above. The simulation may not work although it would require little alteration to make it proper. Grade of D: Schematic exhibits wiring errors along with some component errors (value, type or placement) or an improper wiring for the simulated instrument. The errors are not merely cosmetic but functional, although the circuit is certainly recognizable. Grade of F: Schematic exhibits major errors in wiring, component value and/or selection. Major re-work would be required to have a working simulation or presentable schematic diagram.