Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Appellate Court Arguments on Dowry Death under Indian Penal Code, Essays (university) of Law

The arguments presented during an appellate court hearing regarding a dowry death case under section 304 b of the indian penal code. The defense argues that the appellant is not guilty as no cruelty or harassment was inflicted on the victim before her death and the presumption of dowry death has not been fulfilled. The prosecution, on the other hand, asserts that all elements of the section have been met and cruelty or harassment was indeed inflicted, leading to the victim's death. The trial court order is at stake, with the defense seeking to quash it and the prosecution urging it to be upheld.

What you will learn

  • What are the arguments presented by the prosecution in this dowry death case?
  • What are the arguments presented by the prosecution in this dowry death case?
  • What are the arguments presented by the prosecution in this dowry death case?
  • What are the arguments presented by the prosecution in this dowry death case?
  • What are the arguments presented by the prosecution in this dowry death case?
  • What are the arguments presented by the prosecution in this dowry death case?
  • What are the arguments presented by the prosecution in this dowry death case?

Typology: Essays (university)

2019/2020

Uploaded on 02/21/2020

seeratlaw
seeratlaw 🇮🇳

4.7

(3)

2 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Summary of appellate court arguments.
Defense:
ISSUE2: The appellant is not guilty under Section 304 B, and thus, the trial court order
should be quashed.
The appellant is not guilty of dowry death under Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code
and the complaint is frivolous since the elements under the apparent section have not
been fulfilled. No cruelty or harassment was subjugated on the victim soon before her
death. The presumption of dowry death under section 113 B of the Evidence Act has also
not been fulfilled. Thus, the trial court order deserves to be quashed in order to forward
justice.
Prosecution:
ISSUE2: The appellant is guilty under Section 304 B, and thus, the trial court order should
be not be quashed.
The appellant is guilty of dowry death under Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code and
the as all the elements under the apparent section have been fulfilled. Mental/Physical
cruelty or harassment was subjugated on the victim soon before her death. The
presumption of dowry death under section 113 B of the Evidence Act also applies in the
said case. Thus, the trial court order deserves to be upheld in order to forward justice.

Partial preview of the text

Download Appellate Court Arguments on Dowry Death under Indian Penal Code and more Essays (university) Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Summary of appellate court arguments.

Defense: ISSUE2: The appellant is not guilty under Section 304 B, and thus, the trial court order should be quashed. The appellant is not guilty of dowry death under Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code and the complaint is frivolous since the elements under the apparent section have not been fulfilled. No cruelty or harassment was subjugated on the victim soon before her death. The presumption of dowry death under section 113 B of the Evidence Act has also not been fulfilled. Thus, the trial court order deserves to be quashed in order to forward justice. Prosecution: ISSUE2: The appellant is guilty under Section 304 B, and thus, the trial court order should be not be quashed. The appellant is guilty of dowry death under Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code and the as all the elements under the apparent section have been fulfilled. Mental/Physical cruelty or harassment was subjugated on the victim soon before her death. The presumption of dowry death under section 113 B of the Evidence Act also applies in the said case. Thus, the trial court order deserves to be upheld in order to forward justice.