Summary of Psychoanalytic Theory
―Dream Interpretation—Simplified‖
Everything’s either
concave or -vex,
so whatever you dream
will be something with sex.
Hein, P. (1969). Grooks. New York, NY: Doubleday Books, p. 12.
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Guidelines and tips
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
University Rankings
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Our save-the-student-ebooks!
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Summary of psychoanalytic theory, Summaries of Psychology
Summary of psychoanalytic theory in nature of human being at psychoanalytic theory, nature of healthy functions, nature of corrective action and ideas.
Typology: Summaries
2021/2022
1 / 13
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Related documents
Partial preview of the text
Download Summary of psychoanalytic theory and more Summaries Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!
Summary of Psychoanalytic Theory
―Dream Interpretation—Simplified‖
Everything’s either
concave or -vex,
so whatever you dream
will be something with sex.
Hein, P. (1969). Grooks. New York, NY: Doubleday Books, p. 12.
Context
- Psychoanalytic theory has its origins in the work of Sigmund Freud (b. 1856, d. 1939). As the ―inventor‖ of psychoanalysis and the main author of its theory, Freud began, maintained, and guided (sometimes with a vengeance) a corpus of thought which is said to be cited in scholarly literature second only to Karl Marx and the Bible.
- Freud was trained as a neurologist. In the late 1800s, two approaches existed to the study of neurology. The German school (which would have influenced Freud during his undergraduate medical training) emphasized anatomy, and the goal of the German neurologist was to describe function or dysfunction at the level of the brain and spinal chord. Conversely, the French school of neurology (which would have influenced Freud in the 1880s) emphasized clinical experience, and the goal of the French school was to describe clinical manifestations and the collection of symptoms (called a syndrome) exhibited by a patient. In reading Freud, one can see both traditions reflected in his work.
- At the time when Freud would have been most influenced in his education, the intellectual landscape was teeming with the ideas (and their variations) of Darwin, Spencer (social Darwinism) and the ―crisis of faith‖ (it was during this time that the dating of various books of the Bible was called into question, suggesting that it was more of an anthology than a revealed text) emerging at the end of the Victorian era. This transformation in thought, combining an emerging empirical view of science (one deeply influenced by biology) and Freud’s rejection of the Christian divinity of humans and all religion as an intrapsychic phenomenon, left Freud little place for the higher aspirations of the goodness of humans found in Marxism and other socialist tracts popular in that time.
- Freud suggested two theories of the mind. The first, discussed in 1915, is commonly referred to as the topographical model. Freud suggested that the mind was divided into three layers, the conscious , the preconscious and the unconscious. (Freud never used the term subconscious .) The conscious mind is that part of the mind of which we are usually aware. It is the sensory memory, the working memory, and our sense of awake awareness. Freud thought that the conscious mind was only a very small part of the mind. In contrast, the unconscious mind was a vast storehouse of memories, thoughts, feelings, drives and impulses. All of our experience makes an impression on the unconscious mind. The unconscious is understood to be just that—unconscious—out of our awareness. What is contained in the unconscious is, paradoxically, not known to the individual yet integral to her or him. For Freud, the unconscious was the ―driver of the bus‖ and we (our conscious minds) were simply the passengers. Sandwiched between the conscious and unconscious is the preconscious mind. The concept of the preconscious was needed to account for the fact that there are some things we don’t carry in our conscious minds all the time, but are readily available from our memory.
You... on a good day
(The Nature of Healthy Functioning)
- Healthy functioning for Freud was not all that healthy by modern standards. To understand this, some discussion of Freud’s model of psychopathology is necessary. Freud developed a classification scheme to differentiate categories of psychopathology. In Freud’s system, psychopathology was considered to be a structural issue. An individual’s character structure will have been shaped by the influence of mothering (remember, in Freud’s time and culture, the father was rarely involved in parenting young children) and the development of the Superego and its success in repressing the Id.
- Freud stated, ―If we throw a crystal to the floor, it breaks; but not into haphazard pieces. It comes apart along its lines of cleavage into fragments whose boundaries, though they were invisible, were predetermined by the crystal’s structure. Mental patients are split and broken structures of this same kind‖ (Freud, 1933/1964, p. 59). A patient was considered to fall into one of three categories : neurotic , perverse , or psychotic. The neurotic category was subdivided into obsessive , hysteric , and phobic types. The perverse and the psychotic categories had no further divisions. Modern psychoanalytic writers tend to refer to the perverse character structure as the borderline character structure (McWilliams, 1994). One became neurotic, perverse, or psychotic as a result of the presence or absence of care in the early years. For Freud, development in the first 6 years of life was crucial to future character and temperament.
- According to Freud, healthy individuals were the neurotics. The neurotics’ prime emotion was guilt, and their inner experience was one of conflict between what they wanted to do (i.e., the influence of the Id) and what they knew they should do (i.e., the influence of the Superego). A “successful” neurotic was one who balanced the drives of the Id with the demands of his or her surroundings. Health was measured in how an individual accomplished this task. Freud proposed a series of defense mechanisms which had the role of containing, manipulating and/or transforming the drives and desires of the Id so that they did not spill over into socially unacceptable thoughts and behaviours.
“So... tell me about your mother”
(The Nature of Change or Corrective Action
- To work within the psychoanalytic frame, one must adopt at least one basic assumption: ―What you hear is not what is going on—there is always an underlying cause to the surface presentation.‖ Once grounded in this assumption, the psychodynamic clinician follows a clear set of guidelines for practice. The basic method of psychoanalysis involves four techniques: free association , interpretation , evenly suspended attention , and management of the transference relationship.
- Free association was Freud’s alternative to hypnosis. Finding that he was not skilled at the technique of hypnosis (as it was then known), Freud discovered that by asking the client to simply talk about whatever came to mind, with as little editing as possible, he was able to achieve better results than when he used hypnosis. This instruction to free associate was eventually called the ― basic rule ‖ of psychoanalytic practice.
- As the client free-associates, the counsellor listens for themes and issues, stresses and defenses, seeking the underlying pattern. The listening is done with an attitude of ―free-floating‖ or ―evenly suspended‖ attention. The goal is for the counsellor not to become fixated on specifics, but rather to listen ― with the third ear ‖ for what is really being said at a deeper level (Reik, 1948). As material relevant to the client’s conflicts arises, the counsellor interprets it. An interpretation is an attempt to make meaning of a symptom and is done in a specific way. A ―good‖ interpretation will always link past to present, and unconscious to conscious. The following diagram may serve useful to conceptualizing change in psychodynamic psychotherapy:
References
Freud,
Gustafson, J. P. (1986). The complex secret of brief psychotherapy. New York, NY: Norton.
Kaplan-Solms, K., & Solms, M. (2000). Clinical studies in neuro-psychoanalysis: Introduction to a depth neuropsychology. New York, NY: Karnac Books.
McWilliams, N. (1994). Psychoanalytic diagnosis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Messer, S. B., & Warren, C. S. (1995). Models of brief psychodynamic therapy: A comparative approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Powell, R. A., & Boer, D. P. (1995). Did Freud misinterpret reported memories of sexual abuse as fantasies_? Psychological Reports, 77_ , 563–570.
Reik, T. (1948). Listening with the third ear: The inner experience of a psychoanalyst. New York, NY: Grove Press, Inc.
Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in