Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment: Understanding the History and Dimensions of MBTI, Transcriptions of Law

Download Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment: Understanding the History and Dimensions of MBTI and more Transcriptions Law in PDF only on Docsity!

TITLE: Assessment 1: Personality Assessment

Table of Contents:

• A. History of Myers Briggs Personality Indicator:.........................................................................................
• B. Dimensions of Myers–Briggs Type Index:................................................................................................
• C. Result:......................................................................................................................................................
• D. Finding:....................................................................................................................................................
• E. Conclusion:..............................................................................................................................................
• References:..................................................................................................................................................

conscious combination of traits there was an opposite unconscious one). The second half of his hypothesis is correct. B. Dimensions of Myers–Briggs Type Index: According to the author Jung, it is defined eight personality types by integrating the two perspectives with each of the functions. Extroversion perception, internalized sensory perception, emotionally expressive thought, introverted thinking, and and so on are examples of these sorts. The main of this indicator is to understand what they thought and who they are as per the preference of their life i.e. effort and relationship. Some of the MBTI's characteristics are based on Jung's study, while Briggs and Myers made a new level. These are the four components:  Extroversion Perception v/s Internalized Perception : The author details the components that reflect an individual's behavior. Personality types are inside and focused on their inner workings, whereas people on the spectrum are upward from and geared to the outside reality. Extroversion and introversion are terms that describe how people get their energy. Extroverts are fueled by interacting in big groups of people and having a huge number of friends rather than a small number of close friends, whereas introverts are energized by interacting one on one with a small circle of participants (Cohen & Keren, (2013),p1(3)).  Intuitive vs. Sensing. This level is concerned with how humans process information. Sensing personalities are drawn to the truth. They enjoy learning and focusing on facts by using their senses. Intuitive customers are more worried about first impressions. They adore contemplating options and thinking about things. Where users interpret information is determined by the second word of the MBTI test, Sensing (S) and Intuition (N). Someone good at sensing appreciates realities and lives at the moment. Becoming intuitive entails attempting to deduce the greater connections between events.  Emotion vs. Reasoning : This dimensionality combines the perceiving and intuition plan to identify how somebody responds to the information received. Many who value thinking make rational decisions,

evidence, and logic. Many who value feelings, on the other hand, make their decision based on individuals and sentiments. Another of the Jungian Type Inventory's criteria is Thinking and Feel. Regrettably, the phrase is outdated, as though entails more than just thinking, and feeling does not imply being emotionally unstable or frivolous. They would be about how we make decisions: logically or by respecting individuals. In this they help out to take a decisions which is based on the value and their supporting the other people and helps to identify the qualities which tends to be empathetic and compassionate and help to produce a peace and harmony (Choong, & Varathan,(2021),p7(5)).  Interpreting vs. Judging : Briggs and Myers included this third factor in the MBTI to identify whether a person makes sensible or unreasonable decisions while dealing with the universe. A judging person is structured and makes firm choices, whereas a discerning someone is dynamic and responsive. In another word, they are going to judge what they are observing. The Jungian Type Materials are supplied with the preferences of Judging and Recognizing. Furthermore, the nomenclature is a little outdated, as evaluating is more than just evaluation, and perceiving is more than just gazing at things. This is about how people approach the situation: organized or flexible and spontaneous. They desire closure from the outside universe with order, planning, and structure when you judge. They prefer to have things sorted and marked off their to-do list as soon as feasible. Judges might also want to look for a job that would allow individuals to set targets, organize themselves, and make choices C. Result: From these theories, they want to do the Myers- Briggs Test for identifying and emulating the personality traits themselves. As they want to understand or learn the meaning of life. As the Groups are classified into one of the Myers - Briggs type indicators based on their responses to the inventory's components. The MBTI's purpose is to help people better understand and investigate their characters, especially their interests, preferences, capabilities, weaknesses, potential job choices, and interaction with others.

D. Finding: They analyses the MBIT and they found the negative and positive consequences based on the personality trait. After the test, they learn and start to compare with others which may be drastically affecting their life. From Opinions and suggestions, they do not agree with this test because of the negative consequences that the First and foremost, the MBTI is not a "testing." There are no correct or incorrect replies, and no one type is superior to another. The indicator's objective is not to assess the psychological state or make any form of judgment. These results are still not compared to any norms, unlike many other sorts of psychological testing. Rather than comparing their results, with those of other persons, the instrument's purpose is to simply provide more knowledge on their own particular identity (Montequín, & Nieto, (2013), p5 (2)). But, they look on the side they agree with because of i.e. Positive consequences, they identify the Control of their conduct in various situations by understanding your emotional experiences. This understanding can help you form better and more significant intimate relationships as well as achieve professional success. E. Conclusion: This is to be concluded that the people are alert of components of MBTI and along with assisting them in interacting with some other instructors and learners. When it comes to personal characteristics, they can be both very equivalent and very unique. A personality type does not inevitably have advantages or disadvantages; it simply differs in how researchers think and what they are doing. The MBTI scores reveal important disparities amongst people, which might misjudgments and misinterpretations. Thus, they help them to improve their relationship with others and also identify the qualities which they have himself, they recognize their tendencies and the abilities to monitor and control their behaviors. It aids in the improvement of interpersonal connections. Knowing personal characteristics allows them to accept others for who they are—or at the very least, appreciate

why people act the way they do. It can aid in the reduction of work engagement, allowing for the development of a more healthy and collaborative organizational climate. Hence, it can help members of the team deal with issues like collaboration, conflict resolution, change management, decision-making, leadership, and career transitions.