Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Test 2 Questions - Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry | PHIL 102, Exams of Introduction to Philosophy

Material Type: Exam; Class: Intro to Philosophical Inquiry; Subject: Philosophy; University: Lander University; Term: Fall 2008;

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/16/2009

koofers-user-io0
koofers-user-io0 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Phil. 102: Introduction to Philosophy
Test 2: The Philosophy of Religion
Fall, 2008 c
2005 license GFDL
1 Short Essay 50 pts.
Directions: Answer any five of the following seven short essay questions. All
answers must be in sentence and paragraph form and in standard English to
receive full credit.
1. Explain Aquinas’ Argument From Motion. How does that argument differ
from his Argument From Efficient Cause?
2. State Pascal’s Wager in detail (be sure to state the summary conclusion),
and explain two major objections to the Wager.
3. Explain clearly the distinction between natural and deductive theology.
4. What does Pascal mean when he writes, “The heart has its reasons which
reason does not know.”
5. Using the terms a priori and a posteriori, explain what it would mean to
say that the concept of God is a priori and the concept of a perfect island
is a posteriori. Is it possible that either the concept of God or the concept
of a perfect island could be an empirical concept?
6. Why does Pascal believe that God is incomprehensible?
7. Explain briefly two possible philosophical explanations which Dostoevsky
and/or Hick give to account for the death of an innocent child in a universe
created by an all-good God. From a philosophical point of view, give brief
reasons as to whether you think these accounts would be satisfactory to
most persons.
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Test 2 Questions - Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry | PHIL 102 and more Exams Introduction to Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

Phil. 102: Introduction to Philosophy

Test 2: The Philosophy of Religion

Fall, 2008 ©c2005 license GFDL

1 Short Essay 50 pts.

Directions: Answer any five of the following seven short essay questions. All answers must be in sentence and paragraph form and in standard English to receive full credit.

  1. Explain Aquinas’ Argument From Motion. How does that argument differ from his Argument From Efficient Cause?
  2. State Pascal’s Wager in detail (be sure to state the summary conclusion), and explain two major objections to the Wager.
  3. Explain clearly the distinction between natural and deductive theology.
  4. What does Pascal mean when he writes, “The heart has its reasons which reason does not know.”
  5. Using the terms a priori and a posteriori, explain what it would mean to say that the concept of God is a priori and the concept of a perfect island is a posteriori. Is it possible that either the concept of God or the concept of a perfect island could be an empirical concept?
  6. Why does Pascal believe that God is incomprehensible?
  7. Explain briefly two possible philosophical explanations which Dostoevsky and/or Hick give to account for the death of an innocent child in a universe created by an all-good God. From a philosophical point of view, give brief reasons as to whether you think these accounts would be satisfactory to most persons.

2 ESSAY 50 PTS.

2 Essay 50 pts.

Directions: Answer any two of the following four essay questions in substan- tial detail. Be sure to include supporting reasons for the views described, and explain clearly any philosophical concepts used. If possible, provide examples illustrating those concepts. All answers must be in sentence and paragraph form and in standard English to receive full credit. All lists and diagrams should be explained in such a way that someone not trained in philosophy could under- stand.

  1. State Aquinas’ Argument for Gradation in substantial detail. Explain clearly (not merely state) two objections to that argument. If there is an ultimately good God, would this necessarily logically imply that there is also an ultimately bad god? Why or why not?
  2. State Anselm’s Ontological Argument in detail. Explain in detail two good objections to his argument.
  3. What is Paley’s Watch Argument? What is the difference between pre- scriptive and descriptive law? Why is this distinction important to his argument? Why does not the existence of “laws of nature” necessarily imply the existence of a “Law Giver”?
  4. What is the traditional problem of evil? How can we account for the presence of non-moral evil in the world? In your answer be sure to state the problem of evil clearly, and be sure to define and give examples of“non- moral evil.”