Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Kansas-Nebraska Act: Questions and Answers, Exams of Constitutional Law

A series of questions and answers related to the kansas-nebraska act of 1854, a significant event in american history that contributed to the escalation of tensions leading to the civil war. Key aspects of the act, including its impact on the balance of power between free and slave states, the concept of popular sovereignty, and the role of slavery in the territories. It also examines the perspectives of different groups, including abolitionists, southerners, and northerners, on the act's implications. Valuable for understanding the historical context of the kansas-nebraska act and its significance in shaping the course of american history.

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 01/05/2025

tizian-kylan
tizian-kylan 🇺🇸

2.7

(21)

3.7K documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Compromises and Acts Questions and
Answers Graded A+
How many slaves states were there in 1854? free? ✔✔s- 15
f-17
why did the missouri compromise need to be repealed for this new law? ✔✔bc congress should
not have the ability to prohibit slavery in the territories
which group of americans preferred the missouri compromise and why? ✔✔people in the north
preferred the missorui compromise bc they considered it a binding agreement
Popular Sovereignty ✔✔A belief that ultimate power resides in the people.
why did northern abolitionists looked at a map of America in 1854, what might have concerned
them? ✔✔most of america was open to slavery
why did southern abolitionists looked at a map of america in 1854, what might have concerned
them? ✔✔slave states were coming to an end and they were losing power
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download The Kansas-Nebraska Act: Questions and Answers and more Exams Constitutional Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Compromises and Acts Questions and

Answers Graded A+

How many slaves states were there in 1854? free? ✔✔s- 15

f- 17

why did the missouri compromise need to be repealed for this new law? ✔✔bc congress should not have the ability to prohibit slavery in the territories

which group of americans preferred the missouri compromise and why? ✔✔people in the north preferred the missorui compromise bc they considered it a binding agreement

Popular Sovereignty ✔✔A belief that ultimate power resides in the people.

why did northern abolitionists looked at a map of America in 1854, what might have concerned them? ✔✔most of america was open to slavery

why did southern abolitionists looked at a map of america in 1854, what might have concerned them? ✔✔slave states were coming to an end and they were losing power

why did northerners and southerners go to kansas after this act was passed ✔✔to affect the vote on slavery

senator stephen douglas said said the main idea behind the kansas-nebraska act was popular sovereignty, "the great principle of self-government." whose voices were absent in the decision over whether or not to permit slavery in the territories and why were they ignored? ✔✔slaves and women bc they were overlooked and they were seen as less educated and untrusted than white men

stephen douglas predicted that the kansas-nebraska act would "impart peace to the country and stability to the union." was he correct? ✔✔no, bc it created a lot of violence and debate over the legality of slavery in the proposed state of kansas. it also contributed to the civil war

abraham lincoln said, "I particularly object to ... this nebraska law bc it assumes that there CAN be MORAL RIGHT in the enslaving of one man by another." Do you agree with him that even if people vote in favor of an issue, it can be deemed immoral and illegal by the government? can you think of another issue? ✔✔I don't agree bc it violates the freedom of speech. although i personally believe believe that the gov should have a say on whether they think an issue is illegal or not. a similar issue would be the indian removal act bc the indians really did not have a say and there was a lot of debate over this

Do you think this was a good compromise? What future issues might arise? ✔✔I think it was good at the time bc it wasn't a good long term plan. people of different territories might have wanted a bigger voice in the decision of whether the state is a free or slave state