






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Two wto disputes: india-patent and spain unroasted coffee cases. The india-patent case involved a dispute between the european communities (ec) and india over patent applications and exclusive marketing rights for pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical products. The spain unroasted coffee case was a dispute between brazil and spain regarding tariffs on imported coffee. The document also covers the violations of gatt provisions (article iii and xi) and sps agreement (articles 2, 3, and 5) in these cases. Useful for university students studying international trade law, wto law, and trade policies.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 11
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Facts In the United States, as in many other countries, hormones were commonly used in livestock farming to promote faster growth and increase meat production efficiency. This practice involved administering certain hormones to cattle to enhance their growth. The EC, which represents a group of European countries, expressed concerns about the safety of hormone- treated meat products. As a result, the EC imposed a ban on the importation of meat and meat products from cattle treated with certain growth-promoting hormones Arguments United States' Arguments:
Arbitrator's Report: The Arbitrator's report, which specified a reasonable implementation period, was circulated to WTO members on February 14, 1997. The report determined that Japan had 15 months from the date of adoption of the reports (until February 1, 1998) to implement the recommendations. Modalities for Implementation: Japan presented modalities for implementing the recommendations, and these modalities were accepted by the complainants. This step marked progress toward resolving the dispute by addressing the discriminatory aspects of Japan's liquor tax system.
The United States appealed the DSB ruling, but the Appellate Body upheld the ruling in 2014. The United States subsequently lifted the ban on clove cigarettes.
Brazil argued that Thailand's anti-dumping measures were inconsistent with the AD Agreement and Article VI of the GATT. Brazil argued that the measures were not based on a fair comparison between the prices of Brazilian H-beams and the prices of comparable H-beams produced in Thailand. Brazil also argued that the measures were not necessary to prevent or remedy dumping. The WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) ruled in favor of Brazil in 2007. The DSB found that Thailand's anti-dumping measures were inconsistent with the AD Agreement and Article VI of the GATT. The DSB also found that the measures were not necessary to prevent or remedy dumping. Thailand appealed the DSB ruling, but the Appellate Body upheld the ruling in 2008. Thailand subsequently withdrew its anti-dumping measures on imports of H-beams from Brazil UNIT I International trade and the Law of WTO The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the international organization that sets the rules of trade between nations. It is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was established in 1947. The WTO has 164 member countries, which together account for over 98% of world trade. The WTO's law is based on the principles of non-discrimination, reciprocity, enforceable commitments, transparency, and safety valves. The most important principle is non-discrimination, which is embodied in the most-favored-nation (MFN) rule and the national treatment principle. The MFN rule requires WTO members to treat all other members equally, regardless of their trading relationship. The national treatment principle requires WTO members to treat imported goods and services no less favorably than domestically produced goods and services. The WTO also allows for certain exceptions to the non-discrimination principles, such as tariffs, quotas, and subsidies. These exceptions are allowed only if they are necessary to protect a country's national security, public morals, or human, animal, or plant health. The WTO's law is enforced through a dispute settlement system. If a WTO member believes that another member is violating the rules, it can file a complaint with the WTO. The dispute settlement system is designed to be impartial and efficient, and its decisions are binding on the parties involved. The WTO's law has had a significant impact on international trade. It has helped to reduce tariffs and other trade barriers, and it has promoted fair and transparent trade practices. The WTO has also helped to resolve trade disputes between countries. Here are some of the specific ways in which the WTO's law has affected international trade: Reduced tariffs: The WTO has helped to reduce tariffs on goods and services. This has made it cheaper for businesses to import and export goods and services, which has increased trade and economic growth. Promoted fair competition: The WTO's rules on non-discrimination and subsidies have helped to promote fair competition in the global marketplace. This has made it more difficult for countries to give unfair advantages to their own businesses. Resolved trade disputes: The WTO's dispute settlement system has helped to resolve trade disputes between countries. This has helped to ensure that the rules of the WTO are followed and that trade flows smoothly. GATT
Origin, membership, structure, decision making of WTO Principles of WTO UNIT III Challenges and reforms in developing countries MFN treatment Dumping Dumping is a trade practice where a company sells a product in a foreign market at a price that is lower than the price it charges in its home market. Dumping can be harmful to domestic industries in the importing country, as it can lead to job losses and lower prices for consumers. The World Trade Organization (WTO) defines dumping as "the introduction of a product into the commerce of another country at less than its normal value." The WTO Agreement on Anti-Dumping allows WTO members to take measures to counter dumping, such as imposing anti-dumping duties. There are a number of reasons why companies might engage in dumping. One reason is to drive out competition in the foreign market. By selling products at a lower price, the dumping company can force its competitors to lower their prices or go out of business. This can give the dumping company a monopoly in the foreign market. Another reason for dumping is to increase market share. By selling products at a lower price, the dumping company can attract new customers and increase its market share in the foreign market. This can help the dumping company to achieve economies of scale and lower its production costs. Dumping can also be used as a strategic tool to retaliate against unfair trade practices by other countries. For example, a country might dump products in another country if that country is imposing tariffs or quotas on its exports. The WTO Agreement on Anti-Dumping sets out a number of rules governing the use of anti-dumping measures. These rules are designed to ensure that anti-dumping measures are used fairly and do not harm legitimate trade. To determine whether dumping is occurring, the WTO Agreement on Anti-Dumping requires WTO members to compare the price of the product in the foreign market to the price of the product in the home market. The price in the home market is considered to be the normal value. If the price in the foreign market is less than the normal value, then dumping is presumed to be occurring. The WTO Agreement on Anti-Dumping also requires WTO members to determine whether the dumping is causing or threatening to cause material injury to a domestic industry in the importing country. If the dumping is causing or threatening to cause material injury, then the WTO member can impose anti-dumping duties. Anti-dumping duties are designed to offset the effects of dumping. They are calculated as the difference between the normal value and the export price. Anti-dumping duties can be imposed for a period of up to five years. The WTO Agreement on Anti-Dumping is a complex and controversial agreement. There is debate about how the agreement should be interpreted and applied. Some countries argue that the agreement is too restrictive and makes it difficult to take action against dumping. Other countries argue that the agreement is not strict enough and does not do enough to protect domestic industries from dumping.
The WTO Agreement on Anti-Dumping is a work in progress. The agreement is constantly being interpreted and applied by WTO members. The agreement is also being reviewed and updated on a regular basis