



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The detection of activated oncogenes in rodent tumors and their implications in risk analysis of carcinogen-induced rodent tumor data. The paper covers various techniques for detecting oncogene activation, such as dot blot and Southern blot analysis, and the NIH/3T3 transfection assay. The document also explores the role of carcinogens in activating oncogenes through point mutations and the importance of tumor suppressor genes in neoplastic development.
What you will learn
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 75, pp. 81-86, 1987
Proto-oncogenes are cellular genes that are expressed during normal growth and^ developmental^ pro- cesses. Altered versions of normal proto-oncogenes have been implicated in^ the development of human neoplasia. In this report, we show the detection of activated proto-oncogenes in various spontaneous and chemically induced rodent tumors. The majority of activated proto-oncogenes found in^ these^ tumors^ are members of the ras gene family and have been activated^ by a^ point mutation. Characterization^ of the activating mutation may be useful in^ determining whether this^ proto-oncogene was^ activated by^ direct interaction of the chemical with the DNA. Comparison of activating^ lesions^ in^ spontaneous^ versus^ chem- ically induced tumors should be helpful in^ determining whether^ the^ chemical^ acts via^ a^ genotoxic or a nongenotoxic mechanism. All^ of this information^ may be^ helpful^ in^ the^ assessment^ of^ potential carcin- ogenic hazards of human exposure to^ chemicals.
Recent evidence^ suggests that^ neoplastic develop- ment, at least in part, is the result of the abnormal activation of a small set of cellular genes. These genes, termed proto-oncogenes, were^ originally discovered^ as the transduced (^) genes of acute transforming retrovi- ruses (1-3). Subsequent studies have established that these proto-oncogenes can also be activated as onco- genes by mechanisms^ independent^ of^ retroviruses^ (4). Mechanisms for the conversion of proto-oncogenes to activated oncogenes include point mutations, gene am- plification, chromosomal rearrangements, and promoter insertion (Fig. 1). The activation of proto-oncogenes by genetic alterations^ results^ in^ altered^ levels^ of^ expression of the normal protein product, or in normal or altered levels of expression of an abnormal protein. Proto-oncogenes are expressed during regulated growth such as embryogenesis, regeneration of dam- aged liver, and stimulation of cell mitosis by growth factors. Proto-oncogenes are highly conserved. They are detected in species as divergent as yeast, Droso- phila, and humans. Proto-oncogenes include genes that encode for growth factors (sis), growth factor receptors (neu, erbB, fms), regulatory proteins in^ signal trans- duction (ras family), nuclear regulatory proteins (myc,
*Laboratory of Biochemical Risk Analysis, National^ Institute^ of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box^ 12233, Research^ Triangle Park, NC 27709. tChemical (^) Pathology Branch, National^ Toxicology Program, Na- tional Institute of Environmental Health^ Sciences, P.O.^ Box^ 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
the encoded proteins appear to play a crucial role in normal cellular growth and/or differentiation. The activation of proto-oncogenes in spontaneous and
as ras and myc can complement each other in the ma-
Also, new evidence from several laboratories suggests that in addition to the activation of positive factors (on- cogenes), the loss of negative regulatory functions (tu- mor suppressor genes) may also be a necessary but
ing on^ how the^ particular^ oncogene^ might^ be^ activated.
locations may be detected by cytogenetic analysis. Ex-
STOWERS ET AL.
Proto-Oncogene
c-onc
c-myc c-abl
N-myc c-myc Ki-ras
c-Ha-ras c-Ki-ras c-N-ras
Activation
Retrovirus Transduction
Oncogene
v-onc
Chromosomal Ig/myc Translocation bcr/abl
Gene Amplification
Point Mutation
DM/HSR
12th, (^) 13th, 61st Codon Mutation
Examples Acutely Transforming Leukemia/Sarcoma Virus Murine Plasmacytoma Human Burkitt's Lymphoma CML Neuroblastoma Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Adrenocortical Tumor of Mice Colon, Carcinoma Lung Carcinoma AML Chemical Induced Rodent Tumors myc myb erb B mos int- int-
FIGURE 1. Mechanisms of proto-oncogene activation.
in human tumors and tumor cell lines are shown in Table
3T3 transfection assay. The NIH/3T3 transfection tech-
An extension of the NIH/3T3 transfection assay that
Table 1. Abnormal expression of oncogenes in^ human tumors and tumor cell lines.
Mechanism Tumor type Oncogene Reference Amplification Breast tumor neu^ (24) Amplification Squamous cell^ c-erbB^ (25) carcinoma Amplification Small^ cell^ lung c-myc (26) carcinoma Amplification Small cell^ lung L-myc (27) carcinoma Amplification Neuroblastoma (^) N-myc (28) Amplification Acute (^) myelogenous c-myb (29) leukemia Translocation Chronic myelogenous c-abl (^) (80) leukemia Translocation Burkitt's lymphoma c-myc (31)
gene. The selected cells are then injected SC into the immunocompromised mice. The tumors that develop from the nude mice are then analyzed using the tech- niques described earlier to characterize the activated oncogenes. The majority of activated genes in human tumors de- tected by the NIH/3T3 assay have been members of the ras gene family: the H-ras, the K-ras, and the N-ras. Early studies using the NIH/3T3 assay showed only ras gene activation in a low percentage ofthe human tumors (approximately 10%). Later studies have shown that other oncogenes can also be detected in the human tu- mors by this assay, including the Ica (8), hst (9), and the trk (10) oncogenes. In addition, the percentage of certain tumor types that test positive for activated ras oncogenes are higher than 10%. For example, Verlaan- deVries et al. (11) detected activated ras genes in the 27% of acute myeloid leukemia examined. Ananthas- wamy et al. (12) detected Ha-ras genes in four of six human squamous cell carcinomas examined. The addi- tion of the tumorigenicity parameter to the assay sys- tem appears to improve the efficiency in detection of activated oncogenes in human tumors. A (^) variety of animal tumor model systems have also been examined for activated genes using the NIH/3T assay. These include^ spontaneous tumors in^ rats and mice, tumors^ that^ arise^ after^ single or^ multiple doses of (^) carcinogen, and tumors (^) that arise after long-tern exposure to^ a^ carcinogen. Examples of^ the activated genes in^ the different^ tumor^ model^ systems are^ shown in Table 2. Like the human (^) tumors, the (^) majority of activated (^) oncogenes detected in the animal tumors are members of the ras gene (^) family. Other (^) oncogenes have also been detected in animal tumors using the NIH/3T assay (Table 3). One example is the activated neu on- cogene found in nervous tissue tumors induced in rats by transplacental exposure to N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) or N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). The c-raf on-
Promoter/Enhancer P LTR/c-oncLTR/Common Insertion (^) Domain
Chronic, Non- Transforming Leukemia Virus
82
STOWERS ET AL.
Table 3. Non-ras oncogenes detected in human (^) and rodent tumors.
Table 4. Detection of activated K-ras (^) oncogene in tetranitromethane-induced (^) lung tumors in (^) mice and rats.
Tumor Treatment Oncogene (^) Reference Neuroblastomas (R)a ENU neu (38) Schwannomas (R) MNU neu (^) (16) Stomach carcinomas hst (^) (9) (H) Colon carcinomas (H) trk (10) Hepatocellular Untreated raf (23) carcinomas (M) Hepatocellular lca (8) carcinoma (H) Hepatocellular (^) AFB,b (35) carcinomas (R) Hepatocellular Untreated? (23) carcinoma (M) Hepatocellular Furfural? (23) carcinomas (M) Pulmonary Untreated? c adenocarcinoma (M) Nasal (^) squamous MMS (^)? (13) carcinomas (R) Skin carcinoma (M) DMBA? (17) Skin carcinoma (M) DB[c,h]ACR? (17) a (^) Letters in parentheses (^) indicate species in (^) which tumors occur. R, rat; M, mouse; H, human. bAbbreviations: (^) AFBj, aflatoxin B1; (^) MMS, methylmethanesulfo- nate; (^) DB[c,h]ACR, dibenz[c,h]acridine CJU. Candrian and M.W. (^) Anderson, unpublished data.
result of direct interaction of the chemical with DNA
some instances that the chemical did activate the on-
ing to the DNA. In other instances, the chemical may
oncogene activation is not known is the activated K-ras
irritant. However, the interactions between TNM and
esis study conducted by the NTP, chronic exposure to
mors in^ Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice (19). K-ras
mouse (^) lung tumors (^) (Table 4). The activation of the K-
be the result of one or more (^) actions of the chemical: a
It is a distinct (^) possibility that these (^) activated K-ras
DNA source
Transforming K-ras gene with GGT-*GAT mutation in 12th codon,a number (^) positive/number tested Rat adenocarcinoma 12/12 (^) (100%) Rat squamous cell carcinoma 3/4 (^) (75%) Rat (^) adenosquamous carcinoma 3/3 (100%) Mouse (^) adenocarcinoma 8/8 (100%) Mouse adenoma 2/2 (100%) aThe presence of transforming genes was detected by NIH/3T transfection and/or (^) oligonucleotide hybridization, and the frequency of (^) transforming genes is (^) represented by the numbers in (^) parentheses.
oncogenes with^ GC--AT transitions in the second base of the 12th codon (^) are spontaneous, since an activated K-ras with the same mutation was observed in a spon-
B6C3F1 mouse (U.Candrian, unpublished (^) data). Even
were not observed in this study, it (^) is still possible that the irritant property of TNM could have promoted the
taneously occurring K-ras. The reproducible (^) detection of the K-ras in lung tumors of mice and (^) rats suggests that TNM could have directly induced the mutation. (^) In
shown that TNM causes mutant bacterial strains to (^) rev- ert to the wild type by the same GC-*AT transition.
are required to precisely determine the origin of the
tumors.
location have been observed in several types of human
tensively observed or studied in spontaneous or chem- ically induced rodent tumors. Sawey et al. (20) did ob-
morphisms in addition to activated K-ras genes in rat
et al. (21) suggested that amplification of the mutated H-ras gene (^) may be (^) involved in the progression of mouse skin (^) papillomas to (^) carcinomas. Further studies are re- quired to determine (^) the possible role of chemicals and
mechanisms that can alter (^) gene expression.
that the activated ras was present in the cell that clon-
was recently shown that mouse epidermal cells injected
84
ROLE OF ONCOGENES IN CHEMICAL (^) CARCINOGENESIS 85
in vivo with the viral Ha-ras gene can be promoted with
may be the initiation event in some model systems. Moreover, dormant initiated cells with the activated ras gene can survive surrounded by normal cells until stim- ulated to proliferate by some endogenous or exogenous agent.
Implications for Risk Analysis
vated in order to convert a normal (^) cell into one that is tumorigenic is unknown at (^) present. However, there is increasing evidence that the transformation of a (^) normal cell into a tumorigenic cell involves the activation and concerted expression of several (^) proto-oncogenes as well as, perhaps, the inactivation of suppressor genes. (^) Con- tinued research on mechanisms of (^) oncogene activation in animal and in vitro models may provide new insights into several long-standing problems in chemical carcin-
tential human carcinogens can be useful in several ways. The analysis can help identify chemicals that can acti-
tumors, such as the B6C3F1 mouse liver tumors, appear to be suited for this purpose (23). The classification of
gens, etc., may become clearer as we better understand the sequential requirements for activation of oncogenes in the various animal model and cell culture systems. In (^) particular, comparison of patterns of oncogene ac-
more reliable from examination of (^) oncogene activation and expression in animal model (^) systems for carcino-
mechanisms by which chemicals induce tumors in (^) animal
risk analysis of rodent carcinogenic data.
REFERENCES