Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Importance of Oncogene Detection and Activation in Rodent Tumors: Vital for Tumor Growth, Lecture notes of Risk Analysis

The detection of activated oncogenes in rodent tumors and their implications in risk analysis of carcinogen-induced rodent tumor data. The paper covers various techniques for detecting oncogene activation, such as dot blot and Southern blot analysis, and the NIH/3T3 transfection assay. The document also explores the role of carcinogens in activating oncogenes through point mutations and the importance of tumor suppressor genes in neoplastic development.

What you will learn

  • What techniques can be used to detect activated oncogenes in tumors?
  • What are the implications of detecting activated oncogenes in rodent tumors?
  • What role do carcinogens play in the activation of oncogenes?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

wualter
wualter 🇺🇸

4.8

(95)

288 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Environmental
Health
Perspectives
Vol.
75,
pp.
81-86,
1987
The
Role
of
Oncogenes
in
Chemical
Carcinogenesis
by
S.
Jill
Stowers,*
Robert
R.
Maronpot,t
Steven
H.
Reynolds,*
and
Marshall
W.
Anderson*
Proto-oncogenes
are
cellular
genes
that
are
expressed
during
normal
growth
and
developmental
pro-
cesses.
Altered
versions
of
normal
proto-oncogenes
have
been
implicated
in
the
development
of
human
neoplasia.
In
this
report,
we
show
the
detection
of
activated
proto-oncogenes
in
various
spontaneous
and
chemically
induced
rodent
tumors.
The
majority
of
activated
proto-oncogenes
found
in
these
tumors
are
members
of
the
ras
gene
family
and
have
been
activated
by
a
point
mutation.
Characterization
of the
activating
mutation
may
be
useful
in
determining
whether
this
proto-oncogene
was
activated
by
direct
interaction
of
the
chemical
with
the
DNA.
Comparison
of
activating
lesions
in
spontaneous
versus
chem-
ically
induced
tumors
should
be
helpful
in
determining
whether
the
chemical
acts
via
a
genotoxic
or
a
nongenotoxic
mechanism.
All
of
this
information
may
be
helpful
in
the
assessment
of
potential
carcin-
ogenic
hazards
of
human
exposure
to
chemicals.
Introduction
Recent
evidence
suggests
that
neoplastic
develop-
ment,
at
least
in
part,
is
the
result
of
the
abnormal
activation
of
a
small
set
of
cellular
genes.
These
genes,
termed
proto-oncogenes,
were
originally
discovered
as
the
transduced
genes
of
acute
transforming
retrovi-
ruses
(1-3).
Subsequent
studies
have
established
that
these
proto-oncogenes
can
also
be
activated
as
onco-
genes
by
mechanisms
independent
of
retroviruses
(4).
Mechanisms
for
the
conversion
of
proto-oncogenes
to
activated
oncogenes
include
point
mutations,
gene
am-
plification,
chromosomal
rearrangements,
and
promoter
insertion
(Fig.
1).
The
activation
of
proto-oncogenes
by
genetic
alterations
results
in
altered
levels
of
expression
of
the
normal
protein
product,
or
in
normal
or
altered
levels
of
expression
of
an
abnormal
protein.
Proto-oncogenes
are
expressed
during
regulated
growth
such
as
embryogenesis,
regeneration
of
dam-
aged
liver,
and
stimulation
of
cell
mitosis
by
growth
factors.
Proto-oncogenes
are
highly
conserved.
They
are
detected
in
species
as
divergent
as
yeast,
Droso-
phila,
and
humans.
Proto-oncogenes
include
genes
that
encode
for
growth
factors
(sis),
growth
factor
receptors
(neu,
erbB,
fms),
regulatory
proteins
in
signal
trans-
duction
(ras
family),
nuclear
regulatory
proteins
(myc,
*Laboratory
of
Biochemical
Risk
Analysis,
National
Institute
of
Environmental
Health
Sciences,
P.O.
Box
12233,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27709.
tChemical
Pathology
Branch,
National
Toxicology
Program,
Na-
tional
Institute
of
Environmental
Health
Sciences,
P.O.
Box
12233,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27709.
myb,
fos),
and
tyrosine
kinases
(scr,
abl,
ras).
Thus,
the
encoded
proteins
appear
to
play
a
crucial
role
in
normal
cellular
growth
and/or
differentiation.
The
activation
of
proto-oncogenes
in
spontaneous
and
chemically
induced
tumors
has
been
extensively
studied
during
the
past
several
years.
Although
oncogenes
such
as
ras
and
myc
can
complement
each
other
in
the
ma-
lignant
transformation
of
a
cell
in
vitro
(2),
the
number
of
proto-oncogenes
that
must
be
activated
in
the
mul-
tistep
process
of
carcinogenesis
is
unclear
at
present.
Also,
new
evidence
from
several
laboratories
suggests
that
in
addition
to
the
activation
of
positive
factors
(on-
cogenes),
the
loss
of
negative
regulatory
functions
(tu-
mor
suppressor
genes)
may
also
be
a
necessary
but
distinct
step
in
neoplastic
development
(5).
This
paper
will
discuss
the
detection
of
activated
oncogenes
in
ro-
dent
tumors
and
the
implication
of
oncogenes
in
risk
analysis
of
carcinogen-induced
rodent
tumor
data.
Detection
of
Activated
Oncogenes
in
Tumors
Detection
of
activated
oncogenes
in
neoplasia
can
be
achieved
by
using
several
different
techniques
depend-
ing
on
how
the
particular
oncogene
might
be
activated.
Abnormal
expression
of
oncogenes
in
tumors
due
to
amplification
of
the
gene
may
be
detected
by
dot
blot
or
Southern
blot
analysis.
Increased
expression
due
to
deregulation
of
the
gene
may
be
detected
by
dot
blot
as
well
as
Northern
blot
analysis.
Chromosomal
trans-
locations
may
be
detected
by
cytogenetic
analysis.
Ex-
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Importance of Oncogene Detection and Activation in Rodent Tumors: Vital for Tumor Growth and more Lecture notes Risk Analysis in PDF only on Docsity!

Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 75, pp. 81-86, 1987

The Role of^ Oncogenes^ in^ Chemical

Carcinogenesis

by S. Jill Stowers,* Robert R. Maronpot,t Steven H.

Reynolds,* and Marshall W. Anderson*

Proto-oncogenes are cellular genes that are expressed during normal growth and^ developmental^ pro- cesses. Altered versions of normal proto-oncogenes have been implicated in^ the development of human neoplasia. In this report, we show the detection of activated proto-oncogenes in various spontaneous and chemically induced rodent tumors. The majority of activated proto-oncogenes found in^ these^ tumors^ are members of the ras gene family and have been activated^ by a^ point mutation. Characterization^ of the activating mutation may be useful in^ determining whether this^ proto-oncogene was^ activated by^ direct interaction of the chemical with the DNA. Comparison of activating^ lesions^ in^ spontaneous^ versus^ chem- ically induced tumors should be helpful in^ determining whether^ the^ chemical^ acts via^ a^ genotoxic or a nongenotoxic mechanism. All^ of this information^ may be^ helpful^ in^ the^ assessment^ of^ potential carcin- ogenic hazards of human exposure to^ chemicals.

Introduction

Recent evidence^ suggests that^ neoplastic develop- ment, at least in part, is the result of the abnormal activation of a small set of cellular genes. These genes, termed proto-oncogenes, were^ originally discovered^ as the transduced (^) genes of acute transforming retrovi- ruses (1-3). Subsequent studies have established that these proto-oncogenes can also be activated as onco- genes by mechanisms^ independent^ of^ retroviruses^ (4). Mechanisms for the conversion of proto-oncogenes to activated oncogenes include point mutations, gene am- plification, chromosomal rearrangements, and promoter insertion (Fig. 1). The activation of proto-oncogenes by genetic alterations^ results^ in^ altered^ levels^ of^ expression of the normal protein product, or in normal or altered levels of expression of an abnormal protein. Proto-oncogenes are expressed during regulated growth such as embryogenesis, regeneration of dam- aged liver, and stimulation of cell mitosis by growth factors. Proto-oncogenes are highly conserved. They are detected in species as divergent as yeast, Droso- phila, and humans. Proto-oncogenes include genes that encode for growth factors (sis), growth factor receptors (neu, erbB, fms), regulatory proteins in^ signal trans- duction (ras family), nuclear regulatory proteins (myc,

*Laboratory of Biochemical Risk Analysis, National^ Institute^ of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box^ 12233, Research^ Triangle Park, NC 27709. tChemical (^) Pathology Branch, National^ Toxicology Program, Na- tional Institute of Environmental Health^ Sciences, P.O.^ Box^ 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

myb, fos),^ and^ tyrosine^ kinases^ (scr, abl, ras). Thus,

the encoded proteins appear to play a crucial role in normal cellular growth and/or differentiation. The activation of proto-oncogenes in spontaneous and

chemically induced tumors has been extensively studied

during the past several years. Although oncogenes such

as ras and myc can complement each other in the ma-

lignant transformation of a cell in vitro (2), the number

of proto-oncogenes that must be activated in the mul-

tistep process of carcinogenesis is unclear at present.

Also, new evidence from several laboratories suggests that in addition to the activation of positive factors (on- cogenes), the loss of negative regulatory functions (tu- mor suppressor genes) may also be a necessary but

distinct step in neoplastic development (5). This paper

will discuss the detection of activated oncogenes in^ ro-

dent tumors and the implication of oncogenes in^ risk

analysis of carcinogen-induced rodent tumor data.

Detection of Activated Oncogenes

in Tumors

Detection of activated oncogenes in^ neoplasia^ can^ be

achieved by using several different techniques depend-

ing on^ how the^ particular^ oncogene^ might^ be^ activated.

Abnormal expression of oncogenes in tumors due to

amplification of the^ gene may be detected^ by dot^ blot

or Southern blot analysis. Increased expression due to

deregulation of^ the^ gene may be^ detected^ by dot^ blot

as well as Northern blot analysis. Chromosomal trans-

locations may be detected by cytogenetic analysis. Ex-

STOWERS ET AL.

Proto-Oncogene

c-onc

c-myc c-abl

N-myc c-myc Ki-ras

c-Ha-ras c-Ki-ras c-N-ras

Activation

Retrovirus Transduction

Oncogene

v-onc

Chromosomal Ig/myc Translocation bcr/abl

Gene Amplification

Point Mutation

DM/HSR

12th, (^) 13th, 61st Codon Mutation

Examples Acutely Transforming Leukemia/Sarcoma Virus Murine Plasmacytoma Human Burkitt's Lymphoma CML Neuroblastoma Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Adrenocortical Tumor of Mice Colon, Carcinoma Lung Carcinoma AML Chemical Induced Rodent Tumors myc myb erb B mos int- int-

FIGURE 1. Mechanisms of proto-oncogene activation.

amples of^ abnormal^ expression of^ oncogenes detected

in human tumors and tumor cell lines are shown in Table

A number of oncogenes present in human tumors as

well as animal tumors have been detected by the NIH/

3T3 transfection assay. The NIH/3T3 transfection tech-

nique involves the ability of the NIH/3T3 mouse fibro-

blast to accept and express genes from donor tumor

DNA, resulting in the formation of transformed cells.

Only a^ few^ years ago, Shih^ et^ al.^ (6) were^ the first^ to

show that DNA from carcinogen-transformed cell lines

could cause transformation of NIH/3T3 cells after trans-

fection. This transformation was characterized by a

change in the morphology of the NIH/3T3 cells and by

anchorage-independent growth. Other investigators us-

ing this technique were then able to show that dominant

transforning genes or oncogenes were present in hu-

man tumors and in carcinogen-induced animal tumors.

An extension of the NIH/3T3 transfection assay that

affords greater sensitivity is the nude mouse tumori-

genicity assay (7). This involves cotransfection of NIH/

3T3 cells with tumor DNA and a selectable marker

Table 1. Abnormal expression of oncogenes in^ human tumors and tumor cell lines.

Mechanism Tumor type Oncogene Reference Amplification Breast tumor neu^ (24) Amplification Squamous cell^ c-erbB^ (25) carcinoma Amplification Small^ cell^ lung c-myc (26) carcinoma Amplification Small cell^ lung L-myc (27) carcinoma Amplification Neuroblastoma (^) N-myc (28) Amplification Acute (^) myelogenous c-myb (29) leukemia Translocation Chronic myelogenous c-abl (^) (80) leukemia Translocation Burkitt's lymphoma c-myc (31)

gene. The selected cells are then injected SC into the immunocompromised mice. The tumors that develop from the nude mice are then analyzed using the tech- niques described earlier to characterize the activated oncogenes. The majority of activated genes in human tumors de- tected by the NIH/3T3 assay have been members of the ras gene family: the H-ras, the K-ras, and the N-ras. Early studies using the NIH/3T3 assay showed only ras gene activation in a low percentage ofthe human tumors (approximately 10%). Later studies have shown that other oncogenes can also be detected in the human tu- mors by this assay, including the Ica (8), hst (9), and the trk (10) oncogenes. In addition, the percentage of certain tumor types that test positive for activated ras oncogenes are higher than 10%. For example, Verlaan- deVries et al. (11) detected activated ras genes in the 27% of acute myeloid leukemia examined. Ananthas- wamy et al. (12) detected Ha-ras genes in four of six human squamous cell carcinomas examined. The addi- tion of the tumorigenicity parameter to the assay sys- tem appears to improve the efficiency in detection of activated oncogenes in human tumors. A (^) variety of animal tumor model systems have also been examined for activated genes using the NIH/3T assay. These include^ spontaneous tumors in^ rats and mice, tumors^ that^ arise^ after^ single or^ multiple doses of (^) carcinogen, and tumors (^) that arise after long-tern exposure to^ a^ carcinogen. Examples of^ the activated genes in^ the different^ tumor^ model^ systems are^ shown in Table 2. Like the human (^) tumors, the (^) majority of activated (^) oncogenes detected in the animal tumors are members of the ras gene (^) family. Other (^) oncogenes have also been detected in animal tumors using the NIH/3T assay (Table 3). One example is the activated neu on- cogene found in nervous tissue tumors induced in rats by transplacental exposure to N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) or N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). The c-raf on-

Promoter/Enhancer P LTR/c-oncLTR/Common Insertion (^) Domain

Chronic, Non- Transforming Leukemia Virus

82

STOWERS ET AL.

Table 3. Non-ras oncogenes detected in human (^) and rodent tumors.

Table 4. Detection of activated K-ras (^) oncogene in tetranitromethane-induced (^) lung tumors in (^) mice and rats.

Tumor Treatment Oncogene (^) Reference Neuroblastomas (R)a ENU neu (38) Schwannomas (R) MNU neu (^) (16) Stomach carcinomas hst (^) (9) (H) Colon carcinomas (H) trk (10) Hepatocellular Untreated raf (23) carcinomas (M) Hepatocellular lca (8) carcinoma (H) Hepatocellular (^) AFB,b (35) carcinomas (R) Hepatocellular Untreated? (23) carcinoma (M) Hepatocellular Furfural? (23) carcinomas (M) Pulmonary Untreated? c adenocarcinoma (M) Nasal (^) squamous MMS (^)? (13) carcinomas (R) Skin carcinoma (M) DMBA? (17) Skin carcinoma (M) DB[c,h]ACR? (17) a (^) Letters in parentheses (^) indicate species in (^) which tumors occur. R, rat; M, mouse; H, human. bAbbreviations: (^) AFBj, aflatoxin B1; (^) MMS, methylmethanesulfo- nate; (^) DB[c,h]ACR, dibenz[c,h]acridine CJU. Candrian and M.W. (^) Anderson, unpublished data.

implies that activation of oncogenes in long-term car-

cinogenic studies in the mouse may or may not be the

result of direct interaction of the chemical with DNA

(U. Candrian, unpublished data; 18). It is possible in

some instances that the chemical did activate the on-

cogene directly and is consistent with the chemical bind-

ing to the DNA. In other instances, the chemical may

have increased the background tumor incidence by a

mechanism such as cytotoxicity or receptor-mediated

promotion. If the pattern of activated oncogenes in the

chemically induced tumors is different from that in the

spontaneously occurring tumors, then the chemical

probably caused the mutations, at least in some of the

tumors. One example in which the chemical's role in

oncogene activation is not known is the activated K-ras

oncogene detected in tetranitromethane (TNM)-induced

rat and mice lung tumors. TNM is a mutagen and an

irritant. However, the interactions between TNM and

DNA are not known. In a recent long-term carcinogen-

esis study conducted by the NTP, chronic exposure to

TNM resulted in a high incidence of primary lung tu-

mors in^ Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice (19). K-ras

oncogenes with a GGT-)GAT mutation in the 12th codon

were observed in 18 of 19 rat lung tumors and 10 of 10

mouse (^) lung tumors (^) (Table 4). The activation of the K-

ras oncogene in these TNM-induced lung tumors may

be the result of one or more (^) actions of the chemical: a

direct consequence of TNM-induced DNA damage; the

tumors may be spontaneously occurring; enhancement

of spontaneously occurring K-ras by TNM-induced cell

replication; or combination of direct TNM-induced DNA

damage and^ enhancement^ of spontaneous occurrence.

It is a distinct (^) possibility that these (^) activated K-ras

DNA source

Transforming K-ras gene with GGT-*GAT mutation in 12th codon,a number (^) positive/number tested Rat adenocarcinoma 12/12 (^) (100%) Rat squamous cell carcinoma 3/4 (^) (75%) Rat (^) adenosquamous carcinoma 3/3 (100%) Mouse (^) adenocarcinoma 8/8 (100%) Mouse adenoma 2/2 (100%) aThe presence of transforming genes was detected by NIH/3T transfection and/or (^) oligonucleotide hybridization, and the frequency of (^) transforming genes is (^) represented by the numbers in (^) parentheses.

oncogenes with^ GC--AT transitions in the second base of the 12th codon (^) are spontaneous, since an activated K-ras with the same mutation was observed in a spon-

taneously occurring pulmonary adenocarcinoma in the

B6C3F1 mouse (U.Candrian, unpublished (^) data). Even

though spontaneous lung tumors in the Fischer 344 rat

were not observed in this study, it (^) is still possible that the irritant property of TNM could have promoted the

cells, which activated the K-ras or enhanced the spon-

taneously occurring K-ras. The reproducible (^) detection of the K-ras in lung tumors of mice and (^) rats suggests that TNM could have directly induced the mutation. (^) In

support of this conclusion, mutagenicity studies have

shown that TNM causes mutant bacterial strains to (^) rev- ert to the wild type by the same GC-*AT transition.

Studies on the possible interactions of TNM with DNA

are required to precisely determine the origin of the

activated K-ras oncogenes in these TNM-induced lung

tumors.

Although gene amplification and chromosomal trans-

location have been observed in several types of human

tumors, these activating mechanisms have not been ex-

tensively observed or studied in spontaneous or chem- ically induced rodent tumors. Sawey et al. (20) did ob-

serve c-myc gene amplification and restriction poly-

morphisms in addition to activated K-ras genes in rat

skin tumors induced by ionizing radiation. Quintanilla

et al. (21) suggested that amplification of the mutated H-ras gene (^) may be (^) involved in the progression of mouse skin (^) papillomas to (^) carcinomas. Further studies are re- quired to determine (^) the possible role of chemicals and

radiation in the activation of proto-oncogenes by gene

amplification, chromosomal translocation, and other

mechanisms that can alter (^) gene expression.

Carcinogen-induced rodent tumor models may be use-

ful in determining the temporal activation of oncogenes

in tumor development. Evidence in several animal stud-

ies suggests that activation of the ras proto-oncogene

is an early event. The activated ras gene has been de-

tected in many benign tumors, including mouse skin

papillomas, mouse lung and liver adenomas, and basal

cell and clitoral gland tumors of the rat. This implies

that the activated ras was present in the cell that clon-

ally expanded to these benign tumors. In addition, it

was recently shown that mouse epidermal cells injected

84

ROLE OF ONCOGENES IN CHEMICAL (^) CARCINOGENESIS 85

in vivo with the viral Ha-ras gene can be promoted with

12-0-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) to papil-

lomas (22). Thus, activation of the ras proto-oncogene

may be the initiation event in some model systems. Moreover, dormant initiated cells with the activated ras gene can survive surrounded by normal cells until stim- ulated to proliferate by some endogenous or exogenous agent.

Implications for Risk Analysis

The number of proto-oncogenes that must be acti-

vated in order to convert a normal (^) cell into one that is tumorigenic is unknown at (^) present. However, there is increasing evidence that the transformation of a (^) normal cell into a tumorigenic cell involves the activation and concerted expression of several (^) proto-oncogenes as well as, perhaps, the inactivation of suppressor genes. (^) Con- tinued research on mechanisms of (^) oncogene activation in animal and in vitro models may provide new insights into several long-standing problems in chemical carcin-

ogenesis and risk analysis of carcinogenesis data.

Oncogene analysis on tumors from long-term carcin-

ogenesis studies that are employed to help identify po-

tential human carcinogens can be useful in several ways. The analysis can help identify chemicals that can acti-

vate proto-oncogenes in vivo to cancer-causing genes.

Model systems very susceptible to chemically induced

tumors, such as the B6C3F1 mouse liver tumors, appear to be suited for this purpose (23). The classification of

chemicals as initiators, promoters, complete carcino-

gens, etc., may become clearer as we better understand the sequential requirements for activation of oncogenes in the various animal model and cell culture systems. In (^) particular, comparison of patterns of oncogene ac-

tivation in^ spontaneously occurring and chemical-in-

duced tumors should assist in^ determining mode(s) of

action of a carcinogen. Low-dose and species-to-species

extrapolation ofrisk from carcinogenic data may become

more reliable from examination of (^) oncogene activation and expression in animal model (^) systems for carcino-

genesis. These and similar approaches to explore the

mechanisms by which chemicals induce tumors in (^) animal

model systems may remove some of the uncertainty in

risk analysis of rodent carcinogenic data.

REFERENCES

  1. Bishop, J. M. Viral oncogenes. Cell 42: 23-38 (1985).
  2. Land, H., Parada, L., and Weinberg, R. A. Cellular (^) oncogenes and multistep carcinogenesis. Science 222: 771-778 (1983).
  3. Weinberg, R. A. The action of oncogenes in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Science 230: 770-776 (1985).
  4. Varmus, H. E. The molecular genetics of cellular (^) oncogenes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 18: 553-612 (1984).
  5. Barrett, J. C., Oshimura, M., and Koi, M. Role of oncogenes and tumor supressor genes in a multistep model of (^) carcinogenesis. In: Symposium on Fundamental Cancer (^) Research, Vol. (^38) (F. Becker, Ed.), Raven Press, New York, 1987, in press.
  6. Shih, C., Shilo, B., Goldfarb, M. P., Dannenberg, A., and Wein- berg, R. A. Passage ofphenotypes ofchemically transformed cells via transfection of DNA and chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 76: 5714-5718 (1979).
  7. Fasano, O., Birnbaum, D., Edlund, L., Fogh, J., and Wigler, M. New human transforming genes detected by a tumorigenicity assay. Mol.-Cell. Biol. 4: 1695-1705 (^) (1984).
  8. Ochiya, T., Fujiyama, A., (^) Fukushige, S., Hatada, I., and Mat- subara, K. Molecular cloning of an (^) oncogene from a human he- patocellular carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 83: 4993- 4997 (1986).
  9. Sakamoto, H., Mori, M., Taira, M., Yoshida, T., (^) Matsukawa, S., Shimizu, K., Sekiguchi, M., Terada, (^) M., and (^) Sugimura, T. Trans- forming gene from human stomach cancers and a noncancerous portion of stomach mucosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 83: 3997- 4001 (1986).
  10. Martin-Zanca, D., Hughes, S. H., and Barbacid, M. A human oncogene formed by the fusion of truncated tropomyosin and pro- tein kinase sequences. Nature 319: 743-748 (1986).
  11. Verlaan-deVries, M., Bogaard, M., van den Elst, H., van Boom, J. H., van der Eb, A. J., and Bos, J. L. A dot-blot screening procedure for mutated ras oncogenes using synthetic oligonu- cleotides. Gene, in press.
  12. (^) Ananthaswamy, H. N., Price, J. E., Goldberg, L. H., and Straka, C. Simultaneous transfer of tumorigenic and metastatic pheno- types by transfection with genomic DNA from a human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Abstract 274. Annual meeting of Amer- ican (^) Association of Cancer Research, Atlanta, GA, 1987.
  13. Garte, (^) S. J., Hood, A. T., Hochwait, A. E., D'Eustachio, P., Snyder, C. A., Segal, A., and Albert, R. E. Carcinogen specificity in the activation of (^) transforming genes by direct-acting alkylating agents. (^) Carcinogenesis 6: 1709-1712 (1985).
  14. Sukumar, S., (^) Notario, V., Martin-Zanca, D., and Barbacid, M. Induction of mammary (^) carcinomas in rats by nitroso-methyl-urea involves (^) malignant activation of H-ras-1 locus by single point mutations. Nature 306: 658-661 (1983).
  15. Zarbl, H., Sukumar, (^) S., Arthur, A. V., Martin-Zanca, D., and Barbacid, M. Direct (^) mutagenesis of H-ras-1 oncogenes by nitroso- methyl-urea during initiation of (^) mammary carcinogenesis in rats. Nature 315: 382-385 (1985).
  16. Bargmann, C. I., Hung, M. C., and (^) Weinberg, R. A. Multiple independent activations of the neu oncogene by a point mutation altering the transmembrane domain of (^) p185. Cell 45: 649- (1986).
  17. Bizub, D., Wood, A. W., and Skalka, A. M. Mutagenesis of the Ha-ras oncogene in mouse skin tumors induced by polycyclic ar- omatic hydrocarbons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (^) (U.S.) 83: 6048- (1986).
  18. Reynolds, S. H., Stowers, S. J., Maronpot, R. R., Anderson M. W., and Aaronson, S. A. Detection and identification of activated oncogenes in spontaneously occurring benign and malignant he- patocellular tumors of B6C3F1 mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 83: 33-37 (1986).
  19. Stowers, S. J., Glover, P. L., Boone, L. R., Maronpot, R. R., Reynolds, S. H., and Anderson, M. W. Activation of the K-ras proto-oncogene in rat and mouse lung tumors induced by chronic exposure to tetranitromethan. Cancer Res. 47: 3212-3219 (1987).
  20. Sawey, M. J., Hood, A. T., Burns, F. J., and Garte, S. J. Ac- tivation of myc and ras oncogenes in primary rat tumors induced by ionizing radiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 932-935 (1987).
  21. (^) Quintanilla, M., Brown, K., Ramsden, M., and Balmain, H. Car- cinogen-specific amplification of H-ras during mouse skin carcin- ogenesis. Nature 322: 78-80 (1986).
  22. (^) Brown, K., Quintanilla, M., Ramsden, M., Kerr, I. B., Young, S., and^ Balmain, A. V-ras genes from Harvey and BALB murine sarcoma viruses can act as initiators of two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cell 46: 447-456 (1986).
  23. Reynolds, S. H., Stowers, S. J., Patterson, R., (^) Maronpot, R. (^) R., Aaronson, S. A., and^ Anderson, M. A. Activated oncogenes in B6C3Fj mouse^ liver^ tumors:^ Implications^ for risk^ assessment. Science, in press.
  24. Slamon, D. J., Clark, G. M., Wong, S. G., Levin, W. (^) J., Ullrich, A., and (^) McGuire, W. Human breast (^) cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification ofthe HER-neu oncogene. Science 235: 177-182 (1987).
  25. Lin, C. R., Chen, W. S., Kruiger, W., Stolarsky, L., (^) Weber, W., Evans, R., (^) Vermka, I., (^) Gill, G., and (^) Rosenfeld, M. (^) Expression