Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Logic Test 1: Diagramming Arguments and Understanding Truth, Validity, and Soundness, Exams of Reasoning

A test for students in a philosophy 103: introduction to logic course, focusing on the structure of arguments, truth, validity, and soundness. It includes diagramming exercises and true or false questions to assess students' understanding of these concepts.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/18/2009

koofers-user-u60
koofers-user-u60 🇺🇸

2

(1)

10 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic
Test 1: The Structure of Arguments
Spring, 2006 c
°2006 GFDL
1 Diagramming Arguments
Directions:
First, indicate whether the passages quoted below are arguments or
not. If the passage is not an argument, tell why it is not. Second,
only if the passage is an argument, diagram the structure of the ar-
gument by referring to the numbered statements using conventional
diagramming symbols. (40 points)
1. (1) The Roman Empire collapsed because (2) it lacked the spirit of liber-
alism and free enterprise.
2. (1) The earth cannot be the center of the universe (2) as planets are seen
at vastly different distances from earth at different times of the year.
3. (1) There is probably gold in Abbeville County because (2) Ranson’s Gems
and Minerals of America lists this area as a place to dig for gold.
4. (1) I know that God exists because (2) the world is so well ordered by
scientific law, and (3) this order cannot be due to chance alone.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Logic Test 1: Diagramming Arguments and Understanding Truth, Validity, and Soundness and more Exams Reasoning in PDF only on Docsity!

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic

Test 1: The Structure of Arguments

Spring, 2006 ©c2006 GFDL

1 Diagramming Arguments

Directions:

First, indicate whether the passages quoted below are arguments or not. If the passage is not an argument, tell why it is not. Second, only if the passage is an argument, diagram the structure of the ar- gument by referring to the numbered statements using conventional diagramming symbols. (40 points)

  1. (1) The Roman Empire collapsed because (2) it lacked the spirit of liber- alism and free enterprise.
  2. (1) The earth cannot be the center of the universe (2) as planets are seen at vastly different distances from earth at different times of the year.
  3. (1) There is probably gold in Abbeville County because (2) Ranson’s Gems and Minerals of America lists this area as a place to dig for gold.
  4. (1) I know that God exists because (2) the world is so well ordered by scientific law, and (3) this order cannot be due to chance alone.

1 DIAGRAMMING ARGUMENTS

  1. (1) Trans-fatty acids in margarine raise levels of cholesterol in the blood more than saturated fats in butter raise level of cholesterol. (2) For this reason, butter might be more healthful than margarine.
  2. (1) If Lander is one of the best colleges in South Carolina, (2)then I guess that you should go there.
  3. (1) Coal seams have been discovered in Antarctica. (2) This means that th climate there was once warmer than it is now. (3) Thus, either the geographical location of the continent has shifted or the whole Earth was once warmer than it is now.
  4. (1) A just society cannot possibly pay everyone the same income, since (2) the attitudes and efforts of individuals diverge dramatically, and since (3) the common good is far better served by systematic inequalities of reward.
  5. (1) Because houses with pets have higher amounts of bacterial-breakdown products than pet-free homes do, and (2) these products force the immune system to develop response patterns making the immune system less sen- sitive to allergens later in life, (3) scientists conclude that children who never had pets around are far more likely to have allergic responses as were children exposed to pets.

3 CONCLUSION AND PREMISS INDICATORS

3 Conclusion and Premiss Indicators

Directions:

Assume that each word or phrase given below appears before a state- ment. Is the statement that follows most probably a reason, a con- clusion, or neither? Put a check in the appropriate column. ( points)

Word Reason Conclusion Neither

  1. hence
  2. and
  3. but
  4. thus
  5. since
  6. accordingly
  7. for
  8. therefore
  9. as a result
  10. because

4 SHORT ESSAY

4 Short Essay

Directions: Explain the difference between the terms in the following tions ( points)

  1. statement and sentence which is not a statement
  2. inductive and deductive argument
  3. valid argument and sound argument