Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Structure of Arguments - Introduction to Logic - Paper 1 | PHIL 103, Papers of Reasoning

Material Type: Paper; Professor: Moore; Class: Introduction to Logic; Subject: Philosophy; University: Lander University; Term: Spring 2008;

Typology: Papers

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/18/2009

koofers-user-kjn
koofers-user-kjn 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic
The Structure of Arguments
Spring 2008 c
2008 GFDL
1 Diagramming Arguments
Directions:First, indicate whether each problem below is an arguments. If
a passage is not an argument, explain why it is not. Second, if the passage is
an argument, diagram the structure of the argument by referring to the num-
bered statements and by using conventional diagramming symbols. Third,
state whether the argument is deductive or inductive. (40 points)
1. (1) Looking up at a painting is different from simply looking at a paint-
ing, (2) for there is an element of awe in the experience of looking at
what is above us, particularly when it is at considerable height.
2. (1) Microbes can acclimatize themselves to such substances as sulphonamides
and antibiotics if they encounter them in small doses. (2) Therefore,
when using these drugs in practice, it is important to give as massive
a dose as the patient will tolerate right at the start.
3. (1) John didn’t get much sleep last night. (2) He has dark circles under
his eyes, and (3) he looks tired.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download The Structure of Arguments - Introduction to Logic - Paper 1 | PHIL 103 and more Papers Reasoning in PDF only on Docsity!

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic

The Structure of Arguments

Spring 2008 ©c2008 GFDL

1 Diagramming Arguments

Directions: First, indicate whether each problem below is an arguments. If a passage is not an argument, explain why it is not. Second, if the passage is an argument, diagram the structure of the argument by referring to the num- bered statements and by using conventional diagramming symbols. Third, state whether the argument is deductive or inductive. (40 points)

  1. (1) Looking up at a painting is different from simply looking at a paint- ing, (2) for there is an element of awe in the experience of looking at what is above us, particularly when it is at considerable height.
  2. (1) Microbes can acclimatize themselves to such substances as sulphonamides and antibiotics if they encounter them in small doses. (2) Therefore, when using these drugs in practice, it is important to give as massive a dose as the patient will tolerate right at the start.
  3. (1) John didn’t get much sleep last night. (2) He has dark circles under his eyes, and (3) he looks tired.

1 DIAGRAMMING ARGUMENTS

  1. (1) Questionable research practices are far more common than previ- ously believed (2) since the Acadia Institute found that 44 percent of students and 50 percent of faculty from universities were aware of cases of plagiarism, falsifying data, or racial discrimination.
  2. (1) [D]ay could not be called the cause of night, (2) because it would not be followed by night if the earth’s rotation were to cease.
  3. (1) No one has directly observed a chemical bond, (2) so scientists who try to envision such bonds must rely on experimental clues and their own imaginations.
  4. (1) Since reduction of sodium may prevent the development of hyper- tension in some people and (2) since a high-salt diet is almost certainly not beneficial, (3) reduced salting of food and reduced consumption of salty snack foods is probably a good idea.
  5. (1) If we are open to our experience, (2) then doing what “feels right” proves to be a competent and trustworthy guide to behavior which is truly satisfying.

4 ARGUMENT INDICATORS

3 Validity and Soundness

Directions: Carefully study statements 1-10. Decide whether each statement is true or false, and write in the spaces provided the word “true” or the word “false” in accordance with your decision. (10 points)

  1. A sound argument is a valid deductive argu- ment with true premisses.
  2. All valid deductive arguments are arguments with true premisses.
  3. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound.
  4. An invalid deductive argument could have all true statements in it.
  5. In a valid deductive argument, the conclusion is always true.
  6. A deductive argument could have one false premiss and still be sound.
  7. If a deductive argument is sound, then the conclusion must always be true.
  8. When the premisses of a deductive argument are true, the conclusion must be true as well.
  9. When the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, the argument is always sound.
  10. A deductive argument can be either valid or invalid and still have true premisses.

4 Argument Indicators

Directions: Assume that each word or phrase given below appears before a statement. Is the statement that follows most probably a reason, a conclu- sion, or neither? Put a check in the appropriate column. (20 points)

5 SHORT ESSAY

Word Reason Conclusion Neither

  1. hence
  2. because
  3. but
  4. thus
  5. for
  6. accordingly
  7. for
  8. therefore
  9. since
  10. however

5 Short Essay

Directions: Define the terms in the following exercises and give an specific example of each term. (10 points)

  1. statement and sentence which is not a statement
  2. inductive and deductive argument

name